Sentences with phrase «other flaws as»

There are other flaws as well.

Olive oil has several other flaws as well.

Not exact matches

The Golden Rule — treat others as you want to be treated — has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

The Platinum Rule — treat others as they want to be treated — corrects that flaw.

We haven't got space here to address other grievous flaws such as volatility, scalability and transaction costs (not least the associated energy demand).

The Golden Rule (treat others as you want to be treated) has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

So while the entire article reads as an indictment of Nest, it's worth looking beyond the juicy details to understand how Nest's flaws exist in other parts of Silicon Valley.

Secondly, we see the timing of transaction being addressed as one other flaw.

According to the «Austrian school», one of the most basic flaws in the QTM and in many other economic theories is the treatment of the economy as an amorphous blob that shifts one way or the other in response to stimuli provided by the government, the central bank, or a vague and unpredictable force called «animal spirits».

As with any other computer code, the Bitcoin Network source code may contain certain flaws.

If the approach to se «xuality is flawed, just maybe it's a clue that the approach to a few other things may just be flawed, as well.

One can not expect the Vatican to behave other than it does when it is structured as a totalitarian authority over a flawed system.

You are right, Calvinists do have tremendous flaws in their theology but then so do we all and I have found through the years that it does not help to point out peoples flaws or errors as some are just downright unteachable and others are extremely zealous for what they know.

One way is to see them as flawed factors in the other necessitating division and separation.

And, at the same time, to be fair, what you may perceive as a «Love Story by God» and take it «literally» others perceive it at best, a book of fiction, with some good words of wisdom now and then, to at worst, a book of an insane deity who demands obedience, among other ridiculous things, and... sent «himself» to die for «us» as we are «broken» and «flawed» / sinful» creations, and by sending his - self... if... we just «believe» we go to eternal paradise with him.

The radical theologians are aware of their moral flaws, which seem about the same as those of their friends in other schools of theological thought.

I also know that humans by flawed default will interpret the words as they morally see fit, because it is in our nature to judge others against ourselves and our own ethics, beliefs, and morals.

Evolution has been relentlessly tested and confirmed and is further validated in direct applications ranging from medicine to agriculture to engineering (the same is true of all the other relevant scientific disciplines which creationism requires to be so fundamentally flawed as to be effectively useless, i.e. physics, chemistry, geology, paleontology, astronomy, etc).

Happily married people develop a double vision: they see each other realistically, as flawed and aging people, but also idealistically, as the wonderful beings with whom they first fell in love.

As humans we are able reason how setting standards for our social groups benefited our survival and thus aiding others helped us in the long run versus just some survival of the fittest flawed notion.

Some of the other arguments are flawed as well such as there must have been something with the desire to create or nothing would have been created.

This has the sheen of intelligence — it's easy to feel smart when you're nitpicking flaws in other people's epistemologies — but it's like giving up on a journey as soon as you lose sight of where you started.

If you can't accept that you're theory is as flawed as other theories you're just like the close minded Talibans.

Flawed from being perfect as compared to other humans, it's really quite simple.

They also relied on each other for help and support that was always there, and on the belief that their son, flawed and difficult as he was, was a person worth making every effort to save, even when this effort became the center of their lives.

Moreover, leaving aside its unfortunate opening and closing frame chapters, where the struggle to believe is treated in banal, secular - triumphalist terms from the protagonist's adult vantage, this novel persuasively represents Islam as an active, complex source of theologically framed consolation and challenge for Midwestern Muslims, who emerge as variously flawed believers at odds with each other about the nature and imperatives of their faith.

But you see, I don't expect bad things to happen to me as created by other Chrisitans, but I have no illusions or rose - colored glasses on — Satan is alive and well and will use people within the church system to kill and destroy — My faith is NOT in the church system, but in Christ who set up the church as HIS Body by calling saved, but flawed people into it.

I pray that you will find our Creator, who holds not will over you, that does not judge you, and that accepts you as the perfect human being you are, though others may call you flawed.

But you see, I donâ $ ™ t expect bad things to happen to me as created by other Chrisitans, but I have no illusions or rose - colored glasses onâ $ «Satan is alive and well and will use people within the church system to kill and destroyâ $ «My faith is NOT in the church system, but in Christ who set up the church as HIS Body by calling saved, but flawed people into it.»

If, as Hall and others suggest, the flaw in technological society runs so deep in Western thought and culture, the solutions to our present difficulties (if any there be) must indeed be radical.

He keeps making this same flawed argument, like his other flawed arguments, over and over in hopes that his audience will get tired of giving the routine refutation and let his comments slide, which he takes as a «win», also like Craig.

The idea that we can be lone rangers as Christians or the 180 degree opposite set others as our betters are both flawed and losing concepts.

True church unity is achieved when each person recognizes that all other people have different tastes, desires, interests, and abilities, and rather than see these differences in others as weaknesses to be exploited or flaws to be fixed, this diversity is celebrated and enjoyed as part of God's plan and purpose for the church.

Is it because atheists only point out the flaws of others not their system of beliefs and the people that believe as you do?

The thing is there are others that are just as religious that are to ill or weak to attend weekly services and this data does not include them and this data is therefore extremely flawed.

It is this fundamental flaw in modern theology's understanding of grace that has caused so much trouble in many other areas of theology as well.

that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....

He found flaws in the alignment of the Egyption and Hebrew histories as well as accounts from other sources that back up the Exodus account.

It is a disgrace when you are able to be complete and always you come short, it grows frustration among fans, pundits, and everyone who bet on you... Other so called big teams manged to fulfill their expectations and potential, I mean city, chelsea and man city, and that's why the media stands by their sides, however, our management either has ego or ignorance so much that they decline everyone call to stand as a big club and fix their flaws... Now the pundits and the media wait for us to slip and then say «see we told you»...

If Ozil stays to feed the new attack, and ManU and United hold each other to draws, then there is a chance to be competitive in the EPL at the very top as both Chelsea and Liverpool are flawed, while the Spurs are in trouble with their stars likely to be poached.

but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....

His logic, as other commenters have pointed out, is inherently flawed, and has been proven wrong many times before.

Guardiola is, as some would describe, a genius, however Man United's win showed that the City manager definitely has his flaws, something that other managers should definitely look to exploit when they come up against the Spaniard's sides in the near future.

No def is perfect against everything, that is why the team needs to defend better as a unit while also recognising the flaws that players do have to use others to cover each other better.

Wenger is a great asset to Arsenal, but as a manager with his flaws, it may be better to move him into an other position at the club and get someone who knows how to prevent injuries wenger could but did nt — or with the tactical variety to prevent losses like at anfield and stamford bridge, or making the change of tactic when we just cant score against teams like leicester.

On the other hand it could just be seen as one of those things and that in reality the reason why Arsenal are currently sitting 11 points off the surprise leaders Leicester City is because we have not been good enough or have shot ourselves in the foot too often, while some will point to the lack of transfer action from the boss as a glaring flaw in his master plan.

And while there is much blurring, with some sick of Wenger but wanting him to bow out with a trophy and a legacy, and others who have supported his retention now angling for a change, that is our analytical right as fans — we can love the man yet get frustrated with him, we can support him and despair at some of his decisions, and we can debate his merits and flaws ad nauseam.

Defensive flaws have been shown that will be exposed by the ruthless attacks: City, United, Pool (and as Chelsea did already)-- oh and Real Madrid — but we should be able to put most other teams away playing like this.

None of them are perfect, some may even be deeply flawed... but if they are coupled with a number of other factors, such as sociology, human history, biology, and more... a picture begins to emerge.

It also is not as bouncy as some other models, though depending what you want for your child the engaging toys may make up for that flaw.