Sentences with phrase «other flaws in the argument»

Even assuming no other flaws in the argument this pretty much invalidates the whole thing.
Even assuming no other flaws in the argument this pretty much invalidates the whole thing.
The other flaw in this argument's logic is your survivors would have to pay off the mortgage if you died unexpectedly.

Not exact matches

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.
I haven't gotten anything wrong, and I and others have already pointed out the philosophical flaws in the argument.
In other words, I can articulate the flaws in your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minIn other words, I can articulate the flaws in your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minin your arguments but you can't identify the flaws in minin mine.
Secondly, you are doing the classical Christian Apologetics move by attempting to take a flaw in your position and ask for the other side to make your argument for you.
He keeps making this same flawed argument, like his other flawed arguments, over and over in hopes that his audience will get tired of giving the routine refutation and let his comments slide, which he takes as a «win», also like Craig.
It would either reinforce your argument or show that your argument has flaws... I fear you know it will expose flaws so you will not entertain any other idea apart from the echo chambers you sit in.
The families, campaign groups, and other individuals have, over the years, been consistent in their arguments that the inquest was deeply flawed in a number of significant ways, and that the verdicts should be quashed and new inquests held.
To point out the flaws in the other side's arguments, the challenges their chosen candidate (s) would face in the pursuit of party cohesion and, crucially, electoral success.
Others point out the flaws in the argument.
Other researchers tried to find flaws in Thorne's arguments and, in particular, pointed to problems in satisfying a requirement known as the «weak energy condition».
Hugh McLachlan rightly points out some logical flaws in philosopher David Hume's arguments regarding miracles, but introduces some others in...
There appear to be two differing schools of thought regarding Metacritic; one argues that its inconsequential and its flawed nature means that it should be disregarded in an objective assessment of any games in question and the other school relies on its results to prop up its arguments, even if it makes an admission to the flawed nature of its findings.
I think we can easily see the flaws in her argument if we consider how the same logic she employs can be used to argue against schools having orchestras, theaters, and a host of other activities.
«It simply says that DOJ can not use a flawed legal argument, unsubstantiated by any other legal body as they did in Milwaukee, to start investigations of possible Title II violations.
In addition to the fact that Baker's report is just as flawed as Baker's other work, the entire argument is actually irrelevant.
And any rebuttals on Nicholas Nassim Taleb's arguments regarding the fallibility and fundamental flaws in this and other models used in the markets?
The flaw in this argument is that if No Kill opponents are correct in asserting that an appointment policy will cause intake to go up in other shelters in the area, then we should see an increase in intake in neighboring shelters in every case where an appointment policy is implemented.
What does happen, has happened, in the past with articles like the one Science published is not so very different in a number of ways from what Rud Istvan, Steve McIntyre and others have done in blogs — bluntly point out deficits, tactlessly remark on flaws and fault, explore unreservedly whether any facet associated with an article or paper weakens its arguments.
By focusing on thermometer - based land observations only, and ignoring other evidence conflicting with their hypothesis, MM04 failed to address basic flaws in their arguments.
You will never see them congratulate an opponent on finding a flaw in their argument and they will use all of the other signs if necessary to draw your attention away from the subject.
Observations of the tropical troposphere are not in good agreement with each other, so declaring this a fatal modelling flaw is not a tenable argument.
Basically, the «only 1 % of the problem» argument is flawed for several reasons already identified in this blog, but here is another: it assumes that human beings are not affected by the behaviour of others.
In other words, there was no agreement to build the house in a «rustic» manner; (2) however, because the contract gave the Respondent a «free - hand» in designing and building the Appellants» house, it was open to him to build the house in a rustic manner if he so wished; (3) notwithstanding any such wide discretion, «the argument in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»In other words, there was no agreement to build the house in a «rustic» manner; (2) however, because the contract gave the Respondent a «free - hand» in designing and building the Appellants» house, it was open to him to build the house in a rustic manner if he so wished; (3) notwithstanding any such wide discretion, «the argument in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in a «rustic» manner; (2) however, because the contract gave the Respondent a «free - hand» in designing and building the Appellants» house, it was open to him to build the house in a rustic manner if he so wished; (3) notwithstanding any such wide discretion, «the argument in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in designing and building the Appellants» house, it was open to him to build the house in a rustic manner if he so wished; (3) notwithstanding any such wide discretion, «the argument in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in a rustic manner if he so wished; (3) notwithstanding any such wide discretion, «the argument in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in relation to rusticity can not be used to whitewash every flaw in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in the Respondent's work»; (4) the Appellants did not act unreasonably in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided»in not signing the Respondent's daughter's defects list; (5) some of the DJ's critical comments about the Appellants» conduct (including accusations that they were «squeezing» the Respondent for more) appeared to be «rather excessive and unnecessary», and were «best avoided».
Author Malcolm Gladwell argued in a recent piece for New Yorker magazine that the influence of Twitter and other social - media tools on social activism has been over-stated, but as Twitter co-founder Biz Stone notes in an essay of his own, this argument has some serious flaws.
Hence, the Indian finance ministry's argument in that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are Ponzi scheme - like because they do not have assets backing their value is flawed, as the same argument can be applied to fiat currencies.
Such males might try to squash the discrepancy in viewpoints by means of a series of questions intended to establish once and for all that the other person is irrational, has a logical flaw in their argument, or is «the crazy one».
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z