Not exact matches
Moreover, in those cases, the gap between the leading - edge technologies and the competitors trying to catch up is
on aggregate twice as great for the
fossil -
fuel firms than the clean - technology firms; that is, the dirty energy
companies are generally farther ahead of the
other firms in their fields.
Adopt a goal of requiring, or persuading,
fossil fuel companies to disclose in their 10Ks and
other filings the amount of carbon held for ultimate release
on the asset side of their balance sheets, and the range of possible outcomes to their business if some of those assets are stranded.
The reason a listening tour is the next step, and not a pre-packaged batch of legislation or
other steps, is to build
on the common ground across a wide range of Americans
on energy thrift, innovation and fair play (meaning policies that distort the playing field, with mandated corn ethanol production and tax breaks for
fossil fuel companies prime examples).
Second, if divestment were to reduce the financial resources of coal, oil, and gas
companies (which it would NOT do), this would only reduce research and development at those same
companies of: carbon capture and storage technologies;
other key technological breakthroughs; and renewable sources of energy (the
fossil fuel companies are carrying out much of the R&D
on renewables).
On February 26, E&E Legal President Craig Richardson joined radio host Zeb Bell to discuss his recent op - ed, and how the Rockefeller Foundation and
other green benefactors are using elected officials and the court system to shake down
fossil fuel companies.
These
companies, which include some of the world's biggest producers and users of
fossil fuels, have concluded that limits
on carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse, or heat - trapping, gases are inevitable.
There are already several
other lawsuits worldwide that are attempting to hold
fossil fuel companies, including Shell, accountable for their contributions to dangerous climate change, but most are focused
on financial compensation.
Along with
other major
fossil fuel companies, it deceived the public about the risks of its products and kept us
on a path of unabated
fossil fuel extraction.
The lawsuit comes
on the heels of several
other California communities suing 37
fossil fuel companies earlier this summer for causing climate change.
The Michigan power
company is planning to float 30 year bonds to cover renewable energy and energy efficiency investments, while taking
other steps to favor continued reliance
on fossil fuels over renewable energy.
The conspiracy theories around Exxon and
other fossil fuel intense
companies disregards the important reality that everything we are today is built brick by brick
on the
fossil fuel economy, I think you fall into the trap of thinking that you are somehow removed from that system, free, independent and pure... you are not.
Instead they are working with big industry to ensure that those with the wealth and power, particularly the
fossil fuel companies, can continue to cling
on at the top at the expense of all
other living things
on our planet.
And
on page 271 we're told that the WWF began to «phase - out»
fossil fuel funding from
companies such as «BP, Shell and
others» in the year 2000.
The public relations machines of
fossil fuel companies would have us believe that new hospitals, better education, and all sorts of
other good things are reliant
on the prosperity that comes from us allowing them to sell off our
fossil fuel «resources».
The head of Illinois anti-nuclear organization Environmental Law and Policy Center — which is funded by
fossil fuel interests and
other energy
companies that would benefit from closing nuclear plants — has doubled down
on his efforts to increase carbon emissions by closing nuclear power plants and replacing them with
fossil fuels.
Even the most environmentally conscious might be surprised to learn that their retirement account or 401 (k) could be supporting
companies that rely
on fossil fuels and
other practices that drive climate change.
In keeping with their outsized roles, Koch Industries and ExxonMobil spent more
on campaign contributions and lobbying than any
other fossil fuel company this year.
McKibben is considered the father of the «divestment» movement — defined as applying pressure
on universities and corporations to end all investments in
fossil fuel companies or
other industries that contribute significant amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Interview with Jim Gordon, CEO of Cape Wind The famed Cape Wind offshore wind project has finally been granted a permit to begin construction, after a decade - long battle with the
company and clean energy advocates
on one side, and well - funded
fossil fuel industry interests and NIMBY concerns
on the
other.
Other ministers have taken
on roles in energy
companies with a focus
on renewables or cleaner energy sources, in contrast to those that enter the
fossil fuel industry.
Based
on the report's research, DeSmog UK has mapped the connections between former government officials and the
fossil fuel and
other energy
companies where they have taken up jobs:
As Mashey documents here, so well, this whole party has been a set - up, with scientists
on one side, bound by the rules of evidence and by their own integrity, and think tanks, PR counsellors and their aides and allies
on the
other side, using any technique aailable (including, apparently, obtaining, using and disseminating stolen emails), to defend the right of
fossil fuel companies to continue, unrestrained, in the sale and distribution of a substance that is threatening the human habitability of planet earth.
A practitioner in Texas,
on the
other hand, is more likely to spend their time advising
fossil fuel companies on regulatory compliance.