You see,
the other golden rule of toys is that someone else's are always more engaging than your own.
Not exact matches
The
Golden Rule — treat
others as you want to be treated — has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.
The
Golden Rule (treat
others as you want to be treated) has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.
I am a big fan of the
Golden Rule: Treat
others as you want to be treated in return.
We were taught as children about the
golden rule: treat
others as one would expect to be treated.
3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the
other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the
golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!
I was taught as a child to pray to God and nothing / no one else and that I need not be in a Church or any building and that God hears all of our prayers, to have faith in following The Ten Commandments, to incorporate The
Golden Rule, to be honest and true to myself and most importantly, to not judge
others.
As a non theist, I do not pretend to know what happens after death, I do not pretend to think that God has laid out laws
other than the
Golden Rule.
... When you were born to just live life the best you can for yourself not for
others... Period... No pecticular way exactly who has the
golden rule book?
I am VERY tired of people preaching to me and
others about how «a Christian would and should act» when the hypocrisy of the matter is that I, a «none believer» practice «The
Golden Rule» more than most!
Live by your
golden rule and treat
others as you wish to be treated.
I live by the
golden rule, to treat
others as I wish for them to treat me.
We are, many times, focused on imposing our own agenda on
others and in so doing forget the
Golden Rule.
I think Bin Laden pretty much got what he deserved by the
Golden Rule... which is Do unto
others which you would have done unto you... well I think him KILLING so many means he asked to be given the same treatment!
When you learn to treat
others equally regardless of belief or disbelief, you can pull Holier than Thou card, until then I stand by the fact that is hell exists, it is you who would be there for not following the
Golden Rule!!
Other important principles are the
Golden Rule, which forbids selfishness, and what Grisez - Finnis call the Pauline Principle, which forbids deliberately sacrificing any one of the basic goods to another — i.e., doing evil that good may result.
The
golden rule, and
other messages in the Bible are written to apply to the individual, not the group or the state.
A God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his
other children to earn it; who gave his angels painless lives, yet cursed his
other children with biting miseries and maladies of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths
Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths morals to
other people, and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!
It is only through rejection of this reality that Christians can pretend that their religion was always a beacon of light; it's rejection of the basic impossibilities and contradictions of the
Golden Rule that allows them to believe in a religious theology that most
others openly recognize as unpracticeable.
I think the
Golden Rule has become, «do unto
others as they seem to deserve».
OK Nii, So you are saying you already followed the «do unto
others»
golden rule but not the «love
others as you would love yourself»
rule until 2 years ago?
All great religious Traditions teach a negative version of the
Golden Rule — «you shalt not do unto
others that which you would not have they do unto you.»
The
golden rule and
other good qualities were not invented or owned by Christians, that's just being a decent human being.
Be kind to
others, give to those less fortunate, and follow the
golden rule.
First, I think both groups share a mutual concern in treating
others with respect, love and dignity.We share an interest in the
Golden Rule.
Consider, people love to praise the virtue of the
golden rule, reap what you say, karma, what goes around comes around and so on, but do unto to
others as you would have done unto you, tends to devolve into do unto to
others as is done to you.
«Do unto
others, etc.», is known as The
Golden Rule, but is not attributed to Jesus.
I can show you empirical evidence of the value of the
golden rule, not only in our species, but in many
others.
Erikson, in discussing the
Golden Rule, suggests that the reciprocity of both prudence and sympathy should be replaced with the principle of mutuality which he defines as «a relationship in which partners depend on each
other for the development of their respective strengths.»
That is the point you are bringing up in your take regarding the «
Golden Rule», that
others have to accept whatever it is you want to do.
I don't claim to speak for hypocrites, of which there are many, but the «
golden rule» means warning people of sin, as we would wish that
others would warn us also, if we were living in sin.
Still, if the amended
rule is imperfect, it is nevertheless more workable than the
golden rule — first, because it acknowledges that people are different, and second, because it provides explicitly for taking the
other person's point of view into account.
I was taught that being a Christian is about following the
Golden Rule — «Always treat
others as you would like them to treat you».
Oh, I wanted to thank you for your post a few days ago where you noted Jesus message on the
Golden rule was kindness in contrast to the
other negative presentations of the same
rule from all
other holy books.
My retired mother still believes that the «
golden rule» (do unto
others as you'd have them do unto you) trumps all else.
And the same is true for Christianity, whereby one must also submit one's self (ego) to God through Christ, and wherein the
Golden Rule — to do unto
others as you would have them do unto you — is an all encompassing guidance for understanding and implementing all of the teachings of Christ.
That's why there are so many Christian HYPOCRITES who ignor commands to not judge
others and to support the
Golden Rule and then they choose passages to promote hatred.
As I indicated, the
other religions of the world are different in their presentation of the
Golden Rule.
the
golden rule came from Kong Fuzi an (Atheist) which which was brought over from the Shinto
golden rule (love
others as you love your self) which you cant really love
others until you love your self,... and the idea of tolerance and acceptance is a Pagan ideal not a christian who are completely intolerant of evething not in the bible or mention in the bible as evil,..
Observer, the
Golden Rule is mostly Jesus» wisdom, sprinkled in with a few
other spiritual thinkers of the world.
All the
other religions, even the ones that came before christ ripped of gems like the
golden rule.
When I see someone suffering or in need, I empathize which relates to the
Golden Rule, «do unto
others as you would have them do unto you.»
That's why so many of them have forgotten the
Golden Rule while they are trashing
others such as gays while ignoring the sins of fellow Christians
Galatians» restatement of the
Golden Rule tells us to do to
others as we would want done to ourselves.
I live by a simple
rule, a slightly modified «Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&ra
rule, a slightly modified «
Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&ra
Rule»: «Do onto
others as you would have done to everyone.»
Last time I read the good book I'm sure it condemned murder and violence, and it was Jesus that described that
golden rule to treat
others the way you would want them to treat you... I wouldn't enjoy being starved and beaten... If these people were actual followers of Jesus they would have followed his example.
The corner stone of ALL religions is also the ONLY religious principle that I was taught in the «business ethics» class I took in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to follow the «the
golden rule» (i.e. due unto
others as you would have them do unto you) in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION OF ANY KIND.
Having said that, I suggest that you might want to very carefully re-examine the hermeneutics of those
other «understandings» in light of the «
golden rule» of interpretation (which I am sure you know):
I feel that a good spiritual person will treat
others how they wish to be treated, The
Golden Rule.
And it is of special interest for Christians that these principles of right and wrong at which one arrives include the
Golden Rule (which is stated by Jesus in the gospel of Matthew, as well as in most
other major world religions) and the middle ethical requirements of the Ten Commandments (thou shalt not kill, lie, steal, cheat, etc.).