Sentences with phrase «other golden rules»

You see, the other golden rule of toys is that someone else's are always more engaging than your own.

Not exact matches

The Golden Rule — treat others as you want to be treated — has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

The Golden Rule (treat others as you want to be treated) has a fatal flaw: it assumes that all people want to be treated the same way.

I am a big fan of the Golden Rule: Treat others as you want to be treated in return.

We were taught as children about the golden rule: treat others as one would expect to be treated.

3) The discussion about scaling vs. keeping it small is a very interesting one: I liked that the author presented real - life cases for either scenarios for food for thought instead of advocating one or the other (e.g. presenting a single «formula» as the golden rule that all shall follow)-- I can see how this particular decision can be case sensitive and there really is no «right» answer as long as it works for the entrepreneur!

I was taught as a child to pray to God and nothing / no one else and that I need not be in a Church or any building and that God hears all of our prayers, to have faith in following The Ten Commandments, to incorporate The Golden Rule, to be honest and true to myself and most importantly, to not judge others.

As a non theist, I do not pretend to know what happens after death, I do not pretend to think that God has laid out laws other than the Golden Rule.

... When you were born to just live life the best you can for yourself not for others... Period... No pecticular way exactly who has the golden rule book?

I am VERY tired of people preaching to me and others about how «a Christian would and should act» when the hypocrisy of the matter is that I, a «none believer» practice «The Golden Rule» more than most!

Live by your golden rule and treat others as you wish to be treated.

I live by the golden rule, to treat others as I wish for them to treat me.

We are, many times, focused on imposing our own agenda on others and in so doing forget the Golden Rule.

I think Bin Laden pretty much got what he deserved by the Golden Rule... which is Do unto others which you would have done unto you... well I think him KILLING so many means he asked to be given the same treatment!

When you learn to treat others equally regardless of belief or disbelief, you can pull Holier than Thou card, until then I stand by the fact that is hell exists, it is you who would be there for not following the Golden Rule!!

Other important principles are the Golden Rule, which forbids selfishness, and what Grisez - Finnis call the Pauline Principle, which forbids deliberately sacrificing any one of the basic goods to another — i.e., doing evil that good may result.

The golden rule, and other messages in the Bible are written to apply to the individual, not the group or the state.

A God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his other children to earn it; who gave his angels painless lives, yet cursed his other children with biting miseries and maladies of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths morals to other people, and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!

It is only through rejection of this reality that Christians can pretend that their religion was always a beacon of light; it's rejection of the basic impossibilities and contradictions of the Golden Rule that allows them to believe in a religious theology that most others openly recognize as unpracticeable.

I think the Golden Rule has become, «do unto others as they seem to deserve».

OK Nii, So you are saying you already followed the «do unto others» golden rule but not the «love others as you would love yourself» rule until 2 years ago?

All great religious Traditions teach a negative version of the Golden Rule — «you shalt not do unto others that which you would not have they do unto you.»

The golden rule and other good qualities were not invented or owned by Christians, that's just being a decent human being.

Be kind to others, give to those less fortunate, and follow the golden rule.

First, I think both groups share a mutual concern in treating others with respect, love and dignity.We share an interest in the Golden Rule.

Consider, people love to praise the virtue of the golden rule, reap what you say, karma, what goes around comes around and so on, but do unto to others as you would have done unto you, tends to devolve into do unto to others as is done to you.

«Do unto others, etc.», is known as The Golden Rule, but is not attributed to Jesus.

I can show you empirical evidence of the value of the golden rule, not only in our species, but in many others.

Erikson, in discussing the Golden Rule, suggests that the reciprocity of both prudence and sympathy should be replaced with the principle of mutuality which he defines as «a relationship in which partners depend on each other for the development of their respective strengths.»

That is the point you are bringing up in your take regarding the «Golden Rule», that others have to accept whatever it is you want to do.

I don't claim to speak for hypocrites, of which there are many, but the «golden rule» means warning people of sin, as we would wish that others would warn us also, if we were living in sin.

Still, if the amended rule is imperfect, it is nevertheless more workable than the golden rule — first, because it acknowledges that people are different, and second, because it provides explicitly for taking the other person's point of view into account.

I was taught that being a Christian is about following the Golden Rule — «Always treat others as you would like them to treat you».

Oh, I wanted to thank you for your post a few days ago where you noted Jesus message on the Golden rule was kindness in contrast to the other negative presentations of the same rule from all other holy books.

My retired mother still believes that the «golden rule» (do unto others as you'd have them do unto you) trumps all else.

And the same is true for Christianity, whereby one must also submit one's self (ego) to God through Christ, and wherein the Golden Rule — to do unto others as you would have them do unto you — is an all encompassing guidance for understanding and implementing all of the teachings of Christ.

That's why there are so many Christian HYPOCRITES who ignor commands to not judge others and to support the Golden Rule and then they choose passages to promote hatred.

As I indicated, the other religions of the world are different in their presentation of the Golden Rule.

the golden rule came from Kong Fuzi an (Atheist) which which was brought over from the Shinto golden rule (love others as you love your self) which you cant really love others until you love your self,... and the idea of tolerance and acceptance is a Pagan ideal not a christian who are completely intolerant of evething not in the bible or mention in the bible as evil,..

Observer, the Golden Rule is mostly Jesus» wisdom, sprinkled in with a few other spiritual thinkers of the world.

All the other religions, even the ones that came before christ ripped of gems like the golden rule.

When I see someone suffering or in need, I empathize which relates to the Golden Rule, «do unto others as you would have them do unto you.»

That's why so many of them have forgotten the Golden Rule while they are trashing others such as gays while ignoring the sins of fellow Christians

Galatians» restatement of the Golden Rule tells us to do to others as we would want done to ourselves.

I live by a simple rule, a slightly modified «Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&rarule, a slightly modified «Golden Rule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.&raRule»: «Do onto others as you would have done to everyone.»

Last time I read the good book I'm sure it condemned murder and violence, and it was Jesus that described that golden rule to treat others the way you would want them to treat you... I wouldn't enjoy being starved and beaten... If these people were actual followers of Jesus they would have followed his example.

The corner stone of ALL religions is also the ONLY religious principle that I was taught in the «business ethics» class I took in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to follow the «the golden rule» (i.e. due unto others as you would have them do unto you) in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION OF ANY KIND.

Having said that, I suggest that you might want to very carefully re-examine the hermeneutics of those other «understandings» in light of the «golden rule» of interpretation (which I am sure you know):

I feel that a good spiritual person will treat others how they wish to be treated, The Golden Rule.

And it is of special interest for Christians that these principles of right and wrong at which one arrives include the Golden Rule (which is stated by Jesus in the gospel of Matthew, as well as in most other major world religions) and the middle ethical requirements of the Ten Commandments (thou shalt not kill, lie, steal, cheat, etc.).