What are we to make of those Old Testament passages that in addition to rape condemn
other homosexual acts?
Not exact matches
We've isolated and condemned homosexuality as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a sexual thing (and we're obsessed with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «
other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing
homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from
others people's eyes.)
In the precise sense
homosexual acts comprise anal or oral intercourse chosen by two males, with the intention that at least one of them achieve satisfaction by ejaculating within the
other's body.
But this form of
homosexual behavior — an
act that is chosen — is quite different from
homosexual Christians today who may not remember knowing themselves as
other than
homosexual in orientation.
He treats in a similarly dismissive manner the Church's teaching on contraception, the morally disordered nature of
homosexual acts, and
other matters of great moment.
If we do not have a Telos, then there could not possibly be a problem with
homosexual acts or same - sex marriage — or with many
other things as well.
«Christians,» they said, «must re-think the usual position that has turned
homosexuals into modern day lepers» and «
homosexual acts should be judged in each individual instance by whether the participants were expressing genuine love or simply «using» each
other for selfish purposes (New York Times 20 November 1967 p. 1).
Paul's
other reference to
homosexual acts (1 Cor.
Let us now turn to inquire whether there may not be in fact principles of theology which illumine the relation between the church and homosexuality in terms
other than the proscription of
homosexual acts.