Sentences with phrase «other human animal»

The pope is just another animal of the «human kind» he's no more special than any other human animal.

Not exact matches

The lengthy research cited on HVMN's website and others are primarily animal studies, rather than human studies, and primarily test one of two compounds in combination, rather than the half - dozen contained in a product like SPRINT.

If humans have any hope of living forever, we should probably take a hint from the dozens of other animals on Earth that far outpace our measly 71 years.

By printing multiple lung airways — or any other afflicted organ — from a human patient and testing drugs on them, pharma companies can bypass the ethically challenged practice of testing on animals and proceed to human clinical trials with greater confidence the drugs will actually work, according to Wadsworth.

«The Red Triangle includes roughly 200 miles of coastline.But it's not the beachgoers and surfers that attract great whites to these waters.It's the rich population of other mammals like elephant seals, harbor seals, sea lions, and sea otters.Great whites prefer to prey on these animals instead of humans.

One biological distinction between humans and other animals is a surfeit of the white matter inside our skulls called myelin.

It stimulates growth cell reproduction and regeneration in humans and other animals.

Psychologists often say that humans are set apart from other animals... View Article

Whereas many animal charities draw funds primarily from within the movement (e.g., from other animal advocates and animal charities), GFI is seeking to reach potential donors whose primary interests are in environmental protection, the sustainability of the global food system, and human health.

Yet we are still human beings, and one of the things that separates us from other animals is that we make moral judgments.

We're in love with one other person... we are connected to them in deep ways that only humans (not humans and tools or animals) can be.

The Bible explicitly states that every other human and animal on the planet are killed.

We would expect that since Humans are created in the image of God, they would be unique and clearly distinguishable from other animals.

If humans were not designed by a higher authority, how can each individual's DNA be uniquely different among the human species, especially different than the other animals; how can the life sustaining elements be constantly available and exist in exact formulations: O, H, C etc. water is always 2 atoms of Hydrogen and one atom of Oxygen; sugar, fats, grains, and any bio-chemical products can be broken down to their simplest forms of elements, but can be re-constructed with specific (not by chance) formula.

There actually is a lot of research out there dealing with morality in humans and in other animals.

Two questions come immediately to mind: (I) whether real human kindness and sympathy are, or can be, encountered in the slaughterhouse, in the circus and the rodeo, in the forced captivity of wild animals in zoos, and in pain research in biomedical laboratories, and (2) whether our abuse and destruction of members of other sentient species for our benefit alone can be a truly moral goal for mankind.

So you believe that humans have something that sets them apart from other animals, what you call a * soul *?

Yet by that same token, when we regard the smallest humans as inferior to other animals, we are being «species - ist» in reverse.

Animals including humans are to a variable degree capable of bonding to other beings.

2) If you believe that 2 random particles, «uncreated» by the way, hit each other and created this universe, this world, which started as molten rock, which led to animals, nature, intelligent, conscience humans, etc., then, wow...

We can assume that all the Justices sitting on the Court today, like other humans, have their own preferences and biases about religion, but the judicial opinions of one of them, Justice John Paul Stevens, raise more than a slight suspicion that some of his actions on the bench stem from animosity, if not to animal sacrifice, at least to certain less exotic religious beliefs and practices.

Richard Dawkins merely states in unvarnished form doctrines that other scientific metaphysicians take for granted: In the beginning were the particles and the impersonal laws of physics; life evolved by a mindless, non-teleological process in which God played no part; and human beings are just another animal species.

The human body alone is to complex to be a random act of any set of molecules; and that's not counting the billions of other species of animals, plants, and insects.

The mountains, the seas, the rivers, the stars, the moon, all the other souls housed in human form, babies being born, animals, everything the eyes can see, the heart to feel, ALL is what God created.

well if i had a theory and later found it to not be ture and refuted it then i would not want anyone else to belive it either as i found it wasnt true and further more i would like to think that me and all other humans are better than coming from an animal that eats bugs off its friends and throws its own poo... I'm just saying

believerfred «Thor and the like are man made from known matter and energy with most having human or other animal physiology»

That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.

Dalahäst There are whole medical and scientific fields which study emotions in both humans and other animals.

Like the other animals, humans «bring forth... according to their kind» and, in more peculiarly human fashion, pass on to children their image and likeness (Gen. 1:24; 5:3).

if its the human species... we are but a single branch of primates in the great ape family... Like gorillas and orangutans — we are the product of an evolutionary chain that included compet itors like Cro magnon, and Neanderthal — just like any other animal species.

The human body comes about from the seed and egg of parents in common with other animals, but the soul is created immediately by God's loving command and wise, eternal will.

«Chemical element bromine is essential to life in humans and other animals, researchers discover.»

And it's hard enough to cope with human suffering without worrying about the suffering of other animals.

That's not quite right and in fact you miss one of the biggest differences in the human brain compared to other animals.

For a Whiteheadian it is more natural and correct to speak of the relation as between human beings and «other» animals; for humanity is one species of animals.

That fact has nothing to do with any valuation of humans we might care to make in relation to other animals.

No, all animals have souls and we eat other souls to survive because the bible has taught us that we are somehow superior to animals, a convenient lie to justify the inhumanity we show to farm animals and other humans as well.

In a fallen world, one does sacrifice other animals» lives when protecting human life demands it.

The dog story is sweet — not really about religion at all, but a good reminder of the love in animals other than humans.

There is no human being apart from relations with other people, with other animals, and with the whole of creation.

There is no reason to believe that the skins were anything other than skins from a regular animal (obviously it was not human).

Humans are animals... we are as much a part of nature as any other earth bound life form.

scot, It's one thing to believe so deeply that you eschew evolution or the biological fact that humans are animals, it's entirely another to willfully misrepresent statements by others to support your position, and to deride and taunt people with other positions.

The authors discuss the evolution of the human brain, the importance of language, and compare human intelligence to that found in other animals.

If, on the other hand, the human mind belongs to a rational animal, whose being is contingent, all its arguments are laced through and through with contingency; they can not prove necessarily.

They share some useful thoughts on a range of issues, in particular regarding human uniqueness in comparison with other animals, and the neuroscience of religiousness.

Indeed, the animal rights movement's fury against the speciesist use of animals» a necessary element for human flourishing, particularly in medical research» has increased to the point that scientists are now under threat of death by the most radical liberationists for daring to experiment on rats or monkeys to find cures for cancer and other human afflictions.

Much of the discussion of the first directive has concentrated on the issue of non-violence, but it also says that «the lives of animals and plants... deserve protection, preservation and care».18 The church's record on this issue has been subject to criticism, and certainly modern European society has tended to exploit the natural world and to emphasize the gap between human and other forms of life.

That type of dog would try to hump pretty much anything, other dogs of either se.x, a sofa cushion, stuffed plush animals and of course human legs.

It needs to be stated first that human beings are highly complex psycho - physical organisms with literally thousands of energy events interacting with each other and with and under the dominance of an «organizing center of experience» (the brain), also present in animals with central nervous systems.