If only one of those over 1,000 prisoners, kill just one Israeli or
other human being then the justification for this swap goes out the window.
The thing to remember is this: «If you can't reach your goals without the validation and support of
other human beings then you don't deserve to succeed.»
As long as those thoughts are not libelous accusations thrown at
other human beings then it still can be that kind of site.
Not exact matches
If it can't — if we
humans are hardwired to engage emotionally only with
other humans —
then all those financial advisers, lawyers, and
other relationship workers
are safe.
And
then to take pleasure in slinging it at
others should
be beneath your dignity as a
human being.
Then based upon your false choice which I will indulge, there
is no need for funerals, hugs, sympathy letters or cards or any
other human action or interaction which brings true consolation.
So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental
then it must have
been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of
humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no
other evidence than «it just can't
be accident».
Second: The Creation tale
is simply a way for early
humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament
is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice
then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways» regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the claim that earth
is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and
other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms
was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
It would
be natural,
then, to make Orthodox theological anthropology the overarching theme of the Council and to address all
other questions — such as jurisdictional disputes, ecumenical dialogue, and
human rights — as embraced in the common Orthodox vision for the renewal of humanity.
That
's the danger with the anthropomorphism of God... one people making self idolizing images of themselves of a
human God vis - à - vis Jesus, making graven images of themselves, blonde hair blue eyed Jesus»...
then elevating themselves above all
other men, a self reinforcing feedback to oneselfs, as if they
are Gods, which
is blasphemy.
From a
human point of view it seems ridiculous that a
human being could torture, maim, and kill
others relentlessly during her lifetime or that he could sexually abuse child after child with no remorse and
then upon a sincere deathbed confession of Jesus Christ as Savior,
be granted eternal life, no questions asked.
«If the Torah can
be studied scientifically like any
other human document,» he asks, how
then can «the movement insist on the binding character of its laws?»
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for
human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for
other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY,
then we will begin to feel comfortable that they
are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
well if i had a theory and later found it to not
be ture and refuted it
then i would not want anyone else to belive it either as i found it wasnt true and further more i would like to think that me and all
other humans are better than coming from an animal that eats bugs off its friends and throws its own poo... I
'm just saying
If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that
were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans
then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like
humans we would already
be well into recovery.
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it
's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the
human embryo
is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of
human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders
is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to
be explained somewhat differently... Our
human brains
are given to us by God... to better the life of
other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody
is going to research beyond fourteen days,
then so
be it, lets do it.»
If God
is as the Calvinist insists,
then they
are right: we mere
humans can not question God's judgment or challenge His choices from eternity past to choose some for redemption and
others for reprobation.
The
other myth describes a time when all
human beings lived in one harmonious society; «the whole earth had one language and the same words,» says the story of the Tower of Babel.2 The myth
then explains why, in historical time, there have always
been many languages, many cultures and many societies.
Society,
then,
is the total
human framework within which men administer control and direction to each
other from God, acknowledged and loved in their personal consciences.
A good deal of the time we may find it useful to begin there; and our preaching of the gospel, once it does begin there, can
then move on with the profound logic of experience to the bold affirmation that in this Man, in all his
human conditioning, God
is discovering himself to us as at no
other time and in no
other place.
I think it
's obvious to every
human adult (except those that
are mentally ill) that if you want to
be treated nicely by
others,
then the best practice
is to treat them nicely in the first place.
If it
is not,
then I can not accept it, except by self - deceit, even if some
other human being seems to accept it.
And
then there
's the Judeo - Christian arrogance that God loves us more than all
other life, which
is for
humans to do with as they please.
I
am laughing (ok maybe crying a little), because I said in anger to my youngest sister the
other day, «I
am human, I make mistakes,» and
then continued my angry rant!
Granted, the believers
are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and
then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the
human genome and
other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!
It
is obvious that if the Bible
is handled as a merely
human document,
then its claims may
be accepted or rejected, its teachings may
be in agreement or disagreement with each
other, its subject may or may not
be found relevant to our belief today.
8:1); «God heard» (Bemidbar 11:1);
Then God awoke as one that had slept» (Tehillim 78:65); and there
are many
other similar attributes to Him of
human actions.
I know there
are going to
be a bunch of people out there that scream that God can do anything and could create a sinless Child, but you can not ignore the
HUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something other than human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
HUMAN nature of Jesus, so unless God created something
other than
human, and then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
human, and
then placed it in Mary's womb, he inherited his
human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original
human nature from his mother and thus inherited the Original Sin.
First x object
was created out of nothing,
then combined with
other things created out of nothing,
then magically an atom, yhen a cell, a molecule,
then bacteria, single cell creatures, followed by simple sea creatures with organs,
then more advanced creatures, next red blooded mammals,
then primates, and finally
human.
If we
are human then we can relate to
other humans and thus what happens to one can
be imagined and felt in any
other human.
If all we can say of Jesus and of God
is that Jesus
is God — all the God of God there
is —
then we have effectively ruled out all
other attempts of the
human spirit to glimpse the mystery of the ultimate; and this
is all the more conspicuously the case when our understanding of «Jesus,» in the first place,
is really a dogmatic reduction of his person, his «thou - ness,» to the «it - ness» of christological propositions that, most of them, enshrine little more than our own religious bid for authority.
No individuals who live in civil societies require weapons designed to hunt and kill
other human beings... even if the target
is a Christian evangelical (but
then again).
If God can
be known in what we call experiences of transcendence or ultimacy,
then of course theology can talk of God, as it can of any
other human concept.
Once I realized that
humans were literally created to
be part of community (first God,
then each
other), I understood that social media platforms like Facebook
are a valuable tool.
If you claim to worship a loving God who loves all mankind,
then heaven & he - ll don't make any sense, which
is why I believe they only exist in the minds of imperfect
humans who want to feel superior to
others.
then there
is no need of hell and heavens, no need of good and evil... every one will
be a good one... but because of free will we have
human doing wrong things to
others in terms of preaching them to take them away from worshipping one God and so on... and also no will
be accountable for
others... its like you
are on your own on that day and no counselor / helper... the only helper will
be your good deeds that you have done in this earthly life...
But if we understand God's «glory» as precisely the divine Love - in - act, with its rejoicing in the joys and its sorrowing with the sadness of God's
human children — indeed the glory which
is nothing
other than the divine generosity, gracious welcome, and unfailing faithfulness in mercy and forgiveness,
then the phrase
is rich in meaning.
If the fashion in which the basic New Testament proclamation has
been interpreted in the preceding chapter has validity,
then talk of the resurrection of Christ
is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: his
human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of
others with him after that death, and along with this what has happened in consequence of his presence and activity in the world.
Furthermore, if we recall that to
be human is to
be social, so that our relationship with
others is integral to and largely constitutive of our own identity,
then our thought about survival of death must
be very different from the highly individualistic view so popular in the past.
If, however, one regards the
human person to
be social by nature,
then the function of the state
is not to possess its citizens but to serve their social needs for each
other.
You can say whatever you want to... Al Quran teaches that God created
human in different nationality, ethnicity, language so that one can interact with
other and
then HE gave free will to every single one of the
human... and every one of us will
be held accountable for the using of this «free will»....
The divine nature, like the divine activity, must
then be grasped as nothing
other than the «pure unbounded Love» which in Jesus
was vividly manifested, as he has
been responded to and as through him a vivid and decisive enabling of
human life has
been made possible.
If this debate
is still
being carried on by those whose interpretation of
human existence
is distorted by what I have called falling off to one side or the
other of the ridge, this essay will still
be as relevant
then as it
is today, although the tone of urgency in which it
was written will indeed
be dated.
If the social needs of
humans are coequal with their existence,
then that existence itself
is essentially to
be with and for
others.
Then, once the «reproductive rights» language
is adopted, CRLP and
others take that language back to the legal systems of the participating nations and claim (as the CRLP did in its own lawsuit) that such «agreements... favor protection of reproductive rights, including abortion, as internationally recognized
human rights.»
In
other words, if
humans exist,
then it
is necessary that V - class objects do not exist since they would have wiped us out long ago.
If humanity and divinity
are really distinct (as typical theology expresses with two natures,
human and divine),
then these two distinct elements
are related to each
other.
The hospice families, who cared for and loved and
then let go of the ones they loved, have taught me that the
human heart can
be as big as the ocean, and that the work that God calls us to - to take care of each
other - happens every moment in every place.
It amazes me that atheist will say that religion
is the cause of hate and violence in the world and
then as they post comments that
are full of hate and scorn for
other humans.
robert, you do know those words
were written by
humans to control
humans,
then edited by more
humans to make money, control more
humans and to convert
other humans to christanity right?