Sentences with phrase «other judgement of the court»

It follows that it is a fallacy and, I suggest, a fundamental error, to assert that a judgment labelled «Reasons for Judgment Reserved» has any greater presidential value or binding effect than any other judgement of the Court, however labelled.»

Not exact matches

After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children

So I shall use the word «appraisal» in the remainder of this chapter, rather than the word «judgement»; the latter fails seriously, for us today at any rate, because it is so tied up with notions of law - courts, assizes, and the other paraphernalia of «justice» in the legal sense.

An affidavit was filed a week ago by the A-G asking the Apex Court to order the defendant (Mr. Woyome) to appear before it on Thursday, November 10, at 9:00 am, «to be examined orally on oath by the 1st Defendant (Attorney - General) whether Mr. Woyome has any property or other means of satisfying the judgement debt».

The Certification Officer, a retired high court judge, has rejected one of the right wing's claims against McCluskey and will be making judgements on other claims in June.

International courts do this all the time, looking to what others are doing and using that as the basis of their judgements.

Making reference to the Courts Act of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an appellate court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal case, shall allow the appeal if the appellate court considers (a) that the verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong decision on a question of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.»

The Progressive People's Party (PPP), says it fears the Supreme Court's judgement on the Electoral Commission's suit challenging the disqualification of their flagbearer and eleven others from the December presidential elections, may not bring finality to the matter.

This will include (but not be limited to) details of your household income and expenditure, unsecured credit agreements, secured credit agreements, any court judgements made against you or any other enforcement action being taken against you.

The court in deliverying the judgement consulted experts in this field by way of two members of the British clergy, one a former Archbishop and the other a prominent Bishop who converted to Christianity from Islam (but it would appear not to have relinquinshed his Islamic names!).

There are two neutral citation sources for first instance family judgments below the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (ECourt and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (ECourt of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (Ecourt cases (EWFC).

Lord Justice Briggs, in a dissenting judgement, stated that the marginal costs of implementing a blocking order should instead be borne by the rights holder, in line with the approach taken by the courts in other situations where compliance by an innocent party (here the ISPs) with an equitable duty to assist the victim of a wrongdoing (here the rights holder) should generally be at the victim's expense.

For companies domiciled in Switzerland or other parties wishing to avert an impending lawsuit abroad in Switzerland or before Swiss courts, the option of action for a negative declaratory judgement is now available as a valid option, at least in international cases.

That said, this rule can be effective for certain ICBC and other personal injury claims and reasons for judgement were released today by the New Westminster Registry of the BC Supreme Court illustrating this fact.

contain the following sentence «the [name of party making the offer] reserves the right to bring this offer to the attention of the court for consideration in relation to costs after the court has rendered judgement on all other issues in this proceeding».

The court will look at your evidence and their evidence and the statute and the other judgements in this area of the law and decide who is right.