Sentences with phrase «other judicial education»

In addition, the education budget is also tapped to assist individual judges wishing to attend important education programs offered by other judicial education organizations, including the Canadian Association of Provincial Court Judges, the International Association of Women Judges, the Advocates» Society, the Association for Family Court Mediation, the Cambridge Lectures (offered by the Canadian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies), Osgoode Professional Development, and the NJI — to name a few.

According to Brian Lennox, «many of these programs were seen as truly innovative within the judicial community and have gone on to form the basis of education programs presented by other courts, national and international, and other judicial education organizations.»

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

In a case with a long history, Julie Hancock & Others v. Commissioner of Education & Others, the commonwealth's Supreme Judicial Court firmly rejected claims that the education funding system violated the state's consEducation & Others, the commonwealth's Supreme Judicial Court firmly rejected claims that the education funding system violated the state's conseducation funding system violated the state's constitution.

Maisonneuve was credited by Ontario Attorney General Yasir Naqvi with developing the education plan that expressly mandates new judges need to be trained in sexual assault law and other issues for the new judicial requirements outlined in 2017.

11 To liaise where practicable with judges» associations in other countries and with international organizations engaged in judicial education and improvements to the administration of justice.

Judicial reform, a critical pillar of Afghanistan's reconstruction, has made little progress owing to the dysfunctional legal education system among other factors.

Ontario, on the other hand, had the best judicial education for any provincial court at that time and that was because of Fred Hayes.»

Peter Griffiths worked with the Canadian Bar Association on judicial reform projects in Jamaica.The Court's judges have become active educators at the international level as part of NJI education projects in other countries.

Those tools included — among other provisions — new funding arrangements with the provincial government and new partnerships with various judicial education organizations, including CAPCJ, WJEC and NJI.

Legalize and Regulate Marijuana WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume marijuana and other cannabis products; WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent on ineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive congestion in our judicial system; WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been recommended by the 1969 - 72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs; WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang - related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling — a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada's marijuana industry; BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.

R (on the application of Luton Borough Council & Others) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) Judicial review of the Secretary of State's decision to withdraw funding for the «Building Schools for the Future» programme

R (on the application of Luton Borough Council & Others) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) Judicial review of the Secretary of State's decision to withdraw funding for the «Building Schools for the Future» programme, with Peter Oldham QC

There is an important role for law schools and other legal educators (including continuing legal education providers and judicial educators) in integrating new knowledge about SRLs and debating changes in traditional legal services in order to relate to and to serve SRLs.

Speaking about proposals for a new education programme in development with the JAC, Ministry of Justice and other legal professional bodies, Robin Allen QC said: «The Bar Council is working in partnership to develop a programme of Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE), open to all who are thinking about applying to the bench, but with a high proportion of reserved places for BAME, women and disabled lawyereducation programme in development with the JAC, Ministry of Justice and other legal professional bodies, Robin Allen QC said: «The Bar Council is working in partnership to develop a programme of Pre-Application Judicial Education (PAJE), open to all who are thinking about applying to the bench, but with a high proportion of reserved places for BAME, women and disabled lawyerEducation (PAJE), open to all who are thinking about applying to the bench, but with a high proportion of reserved places for BAME, women and disabled lawyers.»

The panelists will include The Honourable Mr. Justice Colin L. Campbell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Master Calum MacLeod of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, and legal practitioners such as Susan Wortzman, founder of Wortzman Nickle and the Chair of the Steering Committee of Sedona Conference ® Working Group 7, Sedona Canada, and Co-Chair of the Inaugural Program together with Kelly Friedman, a litigation partner with Ogilvy Renault LLP and Co-Chair of Sedona Canada Inaugural Conference, Dominic Jaar, legal counsel at Ledjit, an information management, e-discovery and law practice management consulting firm, Jonathan Redgrave a founding partner of Redgrave Daley Ragan & Wagner and Steering Committee Chair Emeritus of The Sedona Conference ® Working Group on Electronic Document Retention and Production (WG1), as well as Martin Felsky of Commonwealth Legal, David Gray, a partner in the Litigation Group of McCarthy Tétrault in Montréal, Glenn A. Smith, one of the five founding partners of Lenczner Slaght, Karen Groulx, a partner at Pallett Valo LLP, Peg Duncan, Department of Justice, Canada, Robert Deanne, a partner with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Vancouver, Ron Hudges of Nixon Peabody, Kenneth J. Withers, Director of Judicial Education and Content for The Sedona Conference ®, as well as other members of the bench and bar from both Canada and the U.S. Panel discussions will focus on 7 key areas:

Education about the availability of programs and information about other wellness issues needs to be provided in new judge education and regularly reiterated at judicial meetings in substantive sessions rather than just a five - minute Education about the availability of programs and information about other wellness issues needs to be provided in new judge education and regularly reiterated at judicial meetings in substantive sessions rather than just a five - minute education and regularly reiterated at judicial meetings in substantive sessions rather than just a five - minute reminder.

Chapters describe innovative methods of providing self - help services in large rural and urban communities, judicial education, case management, technology projects that prepare pleadings and other court documents, and a creative mediation program operated with pro bono attorneys and law students.