Not exact matches
The legal
institutions, which existed were to protect the status and power of the ruling Yangban class; therefore they functioned punitively turning the people into the victims of the local magistrates, who were the administrators in
judicial and
other areas.
The occasion for Lincoln's declaration of implacable opposition to
judicial supremacy had been a decision which, above all
others, stained the Court's reputation as an
institution dedicated to, as it says above the entrance to the Marble Temple in Washington, D.C., «equal justice under law.»
The ECJ's judgment continued that anti-suit injunctions ran counter to the trust which member states accorded to each
other's legal systems and
judicial institutions on which the system of jurisdiction under Brussels I was based.
At root the system involves a shift in sovereign priorities toward the interests of foreign owners of major assets and away from those of
other actors whose direct representation and participation is limited to democratic processes and
judicial institutions.»
Likewise the (non) possibility for individuals to challenge regulations before the CJEU, the right of action (and rule of law) principle can not circumvene the Treaties: the issue is that the CJEU stated that
judicial review on CFPS is a matter «within» the sphere of EU Treaties, so that MS (and EU
Institutions) can not take action which may impact on them by using «outside» procedures; the rationale is the same used in
other cases: if the matter is covered by EU law, absence of a specific rule in EU law does not enable MS (or the
Institutions) to act: in the Advice on the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction, the mere indirect effect of the Convention of the 44/2001 Regulation was considered sufficient to make the matter fall «wholly» within EU competence, thus depriving the MS of the power to act.
Each level of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform for the
judicial review of arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and data analysis of cases regarding applications to confirm the validity of an arbitation agreement, cases regarding applications to cancel or enforce arbitration awards of our domestic arbitration
institutions, applications to recognize and enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region arbitration awards, cases regarding applications to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards, and cases relating to the
judicial review of arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and
others relating to the confirmation of the validity of an arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee of the correct application of law and of a unified yardstick for
judicial decision - making.