Not exact matches
The answer is that since November 2013 a simple majority has sufficed because of the Senate's decision to end the use of the filibuster in respect of all nominees to Federal
judicial and executive branch
positions other than to the Supreme Court itself.
The report shall be delivered at least ten days prior to the following times: (A) the first day for circulating designating petitions in the case of an elective
position; (B) the meeting date of the
Judicial Nominating Convention or other body nominating a candidate for elective judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
Judicial Nominating Convention or
other body nominating a candidate for elective
judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
judicial positions; or (C) the date any candidate is to be proposed for appointment for any such
judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as p
judicial position;, or (D) if the vacancy in such
position occurs at such a time as to make it impossible to comply with the aforesaid timetable, the panel shall deliver its report as expeditiously as possible.
(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each
judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such
position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such
position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such
position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no
other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).
Prior to joining the General Counsel's Office at DOT, Mr. Geier held several
other positions with the federal government, including Deputy Solicitor to the U.S. Department of Energy's Special Counsel, where he was responsible for
judicial litigation arising out of the petroleum pricing and allocation program, and Regional Counsel for Region X of the Community Services Administration in Seattle, Washington.
He serves as chair of the Executive Committee of the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution and as counsel to the New York State Commission on
Judicial Nominations, among
other leadership
positions.
The committee disagreed, stating that Florida
Judicial Canon 2B prohibits a judge from conveying or permitting
others to convey the impression that they are in a special
position to influence the judge.
Federal Defenders always welcomes applications from attorneys finishing
judicial clerkships and
other significant legal
positions.
For this purpose, the
judicial authority must be in the
position to take into consideration three sets of material: the facts and the evidence adduced by the administrative authority, the observations on behalf of the third - country national and any
other element that is relevant.
The Bar Council reckoned most respondents had no immediate plans to leave the Bar although «a significant minority» were considering a move to «
judicial or
other positions» before 2015.
AB 68 Expands Commission on
Judicial Discipline's power to include a person who is a former justice, judge, justice of the peace or other officer of the Judicial Branch who presides over judicial proceedings if the conduct at issue occurred while the person was serving in any such p
Judicial Discipline's power to include a person who is a former justice, judge, justice of the peace or
other officer of the
Judicial Branch who presides over judicial proceedings if the conduct at issue occurred while the person was serving in any such p
Judicial Branch who presides over
judicial proceedings if the conduct at issue occurred while the person was serving in any such p
judicial proceedings if the conduct at issue occurred while the person was serving in any such
position.
In addition to
judicial clerkships, post-graduate honors and law school faculty
positions, our Florida personal injury attorneys lecture to
other trial lawyer groups in all fifty states and Canada.
A. 20 In effect, this means that whilst decisions of the DSB create an obligation on the part of the losing party to comply with WTO rules, enforcement can be achieved by various means — including amicable settlement, compensation, or the suspension of trade concessions.101 Indeed, it was for this reason that the CJEU found in the case of Portugal v Council that a DSB decision did not oblige the losing party to achieve full implementation of its recommendations, where the possibility of temporary compensation or retaliatory measures remained available.102 In
other words, the outcome was prescribed, but not the means.103 This contrasts with the
position under EU law, where there is a right to an effective remedy from a
judicial body.
Imagine
judicial candidates taking public
positions on custody, alimony, marital property and
other hotly contested issues.
(D) No judge shall employ a spouse or
other relative unless it has been affirmatively demonstrated to the Arkansas
Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission that it is impossible for the judge to hire any
other qualified person to fill the
position.
(1) A judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in
other remunerative activity, but should refrain from financial and business dealings that exploit the
judicial position or involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing business relationships with lawyers or
other persons likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
Indeed, it is arguably even possible to sympathize with the libertarian
position on
judicial review and yet argue that in some types of cases, courts should be more deferential than in
others; or at least I have taken this
position, though perhaps I'm just a faint - hearted libertarian.
Other US state committees on
judicial ethics have also taken
positions warning judges about the perils of networking.
Since the LCA has and will take meaningful
positions and conduct lobbying activities with respect to legislation such as that affecting
judicial compensation and benefits,
judicial campaign financing and / or
other legislation important to the American litigation processes, IRC Reg.