Not exact matches
Craig Kennedy
found the the
jurors on a list online and named them: Quentin Tarantino, (President), Kathleen Turner, Tsui Hark, Peter Von Bagh, among
others, and Tilda Swinton.
«Some
jurors found games that felt like interactive movies or impressionistic models, while
others found liberating creative worlds in which you could do anything.»
Lawyers in Louisville, Ky., are asking a federal judge to set aside a jury verdict exonerating a police officer in a Taser - related death because they say the jury foreman researched the case on the Internet and used what he
found to sway
other jurors.
... The judge made sufficient
findings on the record regarding her concern that the
juror's body odor would affect the ability of the
other jurors to concentrate.
In a high - stakes copyright fight pitting two Silicon Valley tech giants — Oracle and Google — against each
other earlier this year, the presiding judge
found the dangers of researching potential
jurors on the internet outweighed any potential benefit in that case.
1 For attempts to measure the effect of advocacy quality through
other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(
finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and Advocacy at Trial — Real
Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(
finding statistically significant correlations in criminal cases between
jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and
finding statistically significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make?
Last week, at Kingston Crown Court, a seven - week trial had to be aborted because the
jurors started on the Internet and Googling people, and the judge
found out because the
other jurors reported the errant
juror.
Dallas told
other jurors during their deliberation what she had
found in this way, with the consequence that, when this breach was reported to the trial judge, the trial was stopped.
Most judges
find out about
juror misuse of Net media from tattling by
other jurors or lawyers (perhaps lawyers who feel they are losing the case?).
Finding: «The presence of opposing expert testimony caused
jurors to be skeptical of all expert testimony rather than sensitizing them to flaws in the
other expert's testimony... Thus, contrary to the assumptions in the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert, opposing expert testimony may not be an effective safeguard against junk science in the courtroom.»