Sentences with phrase «other kind of argument»

When it comes to issues of sexuality, in particular, a human dramatization has affected them more than a legal argument, or any other kind of argument for that matter.

The are, however, a variety of other kinds of arguments from ignorance.

Not exact matches

Now, you know, the tables have turned — kind of the same argument on the other side.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

Treating family and friends just like one would any other kind of serious investor can head off arguments later.

DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?

All the while, these companies have made an overarching argument that they should not have to follow the kinds of laws that every other industry in the country — very much including the ones that they are disrupting — follow.

«I haven't seen any argument as to why the federal government doesn't have authority to regulate this interprovincial pipeline the way they have authority over all kinds of other interprovincial undertakings,» she said.

The arguments of Adair Turner and others seem to me to depend on a notion that you are making some kind of permanent commitment with respect to future monetary policy by engaging in money - financed fiscal policy.

My argument is, then, that the activities of the Reformation warranted an image of the minister teaching — when shown as instructing a group (focally the family but also other kinds of groups) on how to continue their instruction and learning.

Whatever the precise details, versions of the satiety argument seek some kind of natural limit to life other than simply the wearing down of our finite body, our biological self.

There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

I have had those kind of arguments in the kitchen before, too;) like the other day when my boyfriend wanted to have fish and ships for dinner and I suggested zucchini fries (a my new roots recipe) instead.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

On the other hand, the Catalan actors put forward two kinds of legitimizing argument depending on whether the aim is to justify the holding of a referendum on secession, or to justify the advisability of Catalonia becoming an independent state.

Peter» Petro Dobromylskyj ------------------------------ This kind of argument is futile because we will never convince the other — and you are welcome to have the last word.

Its lifespan may not be the most expected for a game of its kind but Owlboy offers very good arguments on every other component that make this game stand out for the passion its creators put into it.

On the other hand, I've seen some pretty firm arguments that students have no role whatsoever in these kinds of decisions.

However, the reason these kinds of questions are tricky is because the questioner, from his / her point of view tells me the critical information (critical from his or her point of view)-- and the folks on the other side of the argument would have provided me with other information that they think matters.

No arguments there, as the MX5 is small, light, and puts up the right kind of competition to other, more expensive sports car.

On a related note, there's an increasingly common argument that we should interact with the natural world because it makes us feel happy, or has other kinds of therapeutic value.

Viveros - Fauné writes: «An argument can be made that Neel reserved her best, most perceptive nose for difference for her less known sitters... These pictures and others are not only unmarred by agendas of any kind, they appear instead to have been created out of a profound need to understand what lies beyond their sitters» social standing and self - presentations.

Since the truth of falsity of any scientific claim can only be evaluated on it's own terms — and not via its association with other ideas or the character of its proponents — this kind of argument is only rhetorical.

With a fairly religious public like the American one, that means, among other things, that you have to consider carefully the kind of data Ray (# 32) points to, and the kind of arguments Snapple (# 29) makes (and that I, for one, agree with).

In other words, the kinds of arguments environmentalists deployed, the nature of environmental conflict, shifted and became more ecology - focused in part because as a quantifiable science ecological arguments were more persuasive in court.

And one last note regarding the eternal «corporate» argument that also surfaced in the article above: People who develop Golden Rice and other GMOs are people who studied biology or agronomy, people who support Golden Rice are pediatricians and nutritionists — are those the kind of people we distrust?

And the same kind of argument can be made for any other limiting factors, from money to space to raw materials to psychological or social factors.

My take home from these emails is that my argument isn't particularly original (this kind of thing is endemic and widely discussed in other fields) and my argument was too narrow (I didn't include the increasing financial interests and big $ $ in all this, as well as politicians investing their careers in this.)

And through conversations with others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all kinds of ways that climate change could become a catalyzing force for positive change — how it could be the best argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving of local economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest in starving public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back ownership of essential services like energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all of which would help to end grotesque levels of inequality within our nations and between them.

Your «known cognitive and psychological attributes» is merely your and others attempt to bypass argument, dismiss your opponent and patronise (out of a kind of «phobia») those who disagree with you.

No matter what kind of arguments / disagreements / quasi-flame battles I get in with other posters here, I mean nothing personally by it, and I make no character judgements in the long run.

I think scientists enjoy and are used to rigorously testing their ideas and the ideas of others in what I would consider toe - to - toe, you're - wrong - and - here's - the - proof, kind of arguments.

The judge found that the plaintiff never demonstrated that the bat in question had some characteristic that made it defective relative to other acceptable bats, and also rejected plaintiff's argument that the bat should have come with a special warning label of some kind.

This kind of argument is often called a «defense of others» defense which is available in every jurisdiction of which I am aware.

But, if your client is effectively «deputized» or becomes a «de facto» agent of the state who is called up to be a member of a posse for the police, for example, by using an agreed symbol such as shining a light with a symbol on it on some clouds, at that point, with respect to that matter, the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule and Miranda probably do apply to evidence that your client obtains, and exclusion of that kind of evidence could make prosecution much more difficult, unless the prosecution can successfully make an argument that the other evidence that the illegally obtained evidence leads them to is not «fruit of the poisonous tree» because it would have inevitably been discovered in due course using only the legally obtained evidence.

Research in other artistic disciplines indicates that when young people recognize they are part of a community, they are generally more willing to take the rules of that community and transfer those rules to other learning.130 Novice legal writers are particularly prone to feeling that their past writing experience is irrelevant to the unique organizational demands and argument constructs of legal discourse; «[t] heir [consequent] discouragement, and the anxiety that often accompanies it, can produce profound self - doubt, and, for more than a few, a kind of writing paralysis.»

The Chief Justice rejects the distinction that the appellants and some interveners defended at oral argument between hearing fees and fees of other kinds (such as filing fees) which courts in every province levy.

What's your sense of that kind of age - old argument they should be out catching other criminals?

Without a Parenting Plan that is very specific and detailed in writing, you can find yourself in the kind of frequent arguments with your soon - to - be ex that makes the Middle Eastern countries look cooperative with each other.

When couples argue, the arguments are usually a kind of protest from one partner about not feeling connected, not trusting, or not feeling safe or secure with the other partner.

If I'm the kind of person that blames and criticizes and points out what the other person isn't doing right in a fight or in an argument or moment of disconnection, I can start to see, «Oh my God, that makes my partner feel like they're not enough and they feel powerless, and they feel awful inside.