Dazzling and often quite humorous, Morris's drawings show her special manner of using formal means to prod and pry at
other kinds of meaning, be they connotative, emotional, or literal.
Not exact matches
The pressure in this case is coming from brokers who want to set up their own virtual office websites (VOWs)-- essentially searchable online databases similar to Realtor.ca — and furnish the sites with the same
kind of details (mainly negotiated sale prices) they can pull from MLS and give to clients through
other means.
«Every
other country in the world has some
kind of securities law,» Santori said, «so just because you're trying to avoid the U.S. securities law it doesn't
mean you [avoid] the rest
of the world's securities law.»
These aren't the
kind of hacks that
mean tech - savvy folks need to change their login credentials, but precursors to something far more serious: potentially devastating and life - threatening infrastructure disruptions that could leave thousands or millions
of people without electricity or
other utilities.
Finally, in -
kind income is supposed to be taxed in most instances, so removing the loophole
means tuition waivers are treated like
other forms
of in -
kind income which is an equity issue.
And when I go back through my archives, these are the
kinds of gifts that really
mean something now, the ones that are unexpirable, that take on more
meaning the longer you keep them and the more you share their story with
others.
In my last post in this series, I observed that an economy's «base» money serves as the «raw material» that commercial banks and
other private - market financial intermediaries employ in «producing» deposits
of various
kinds that can themselves serve as
means of exchange.
The fact that the demand for credit is distinct from the demand for money, and that the two things can change independently,
means, among
other things, that interest rates, which adjust to «clear» markets for various
kinds of credit, can not also be counted on to «clear» the market for money balances.
This reality and the conditions that pertain to it
mean that you can float on the seas
of authority bloat that fuels your vertical, but the efforts that it requires is simply not worth it to build any
kind of sustained ranking, as too many levers must float in your favor — such as the website where your link was originally hosted maintaining it's weight before being pillaged by
other SEOs capable
of basic competitive research — or your competitors being bad enough to not have an SEO who has heard
of competitive research — in order for it to be a worthwhile strategy.
Ideally, when it comes to which sectors you're investing in, you'll have a nice mix
of both defensive and cyclical stocks —
meaning companies that should hold up well in all
kinds of markets (like utilities) and
others that can be expected to perform particularly well in certain economic environments (like hotels and restaurants, which benefit when the economy is booming).
For me, it's amazing, you know I have to
kind of pinch myself, but on the
other hand, you know God's a faithful God, and it's not surprising in that sense, if you see what I
mean.
I've been to funerals and encountered this
kind of prejudice where those leading the service insisted you must be a member
of their religion to get over grief, and you can only really talk about it in the language
of the Bible, no
other discussion has any
meaning.
I
mean simply that I expect any writing to make literal sense before making sense
of any
other kind.
Moreover, to say that sameness is one
of the laws
of violence is to say that, on the one hand, violence has no limits and, on the
other, that condoning violence
means condoning every
kind of violence.
For starters, that
kind of principle will inevitably
mean that those who study the bible beliving in it will think it says something completely different than
others who read it.
Here I
mean by it that Christianity must be accepted in its revealed totality — accepted absolutely, intransigently, without cultural or philosophical or any
other kind of accommodation or adaptation.)
You
mean,
kind of like it's wrong to impose traffic laws on people, and it's wrong to make it against the law to murder
other people, and it's wrong to beat people up?
Great as is the significance
of the emergence
of self - conscious persons within the very fabric
of the universe for any reflection on its possible
meaning and purpose, this must not lead us to underplay the significance also
of the rest
of the universe and
of all
other living organisms to God as Creator — even though we are able to depict only in imagination the
kind of delight that God may be conceived to have in the fecund multiplicity and variety or created forms.
It does
mean, however, that, as this example from the Old Testament indicates, the Easter appearances were not dissimilar in
kind from
other phenomena in the history
of religious experience.
Orthodoxy is being able not only to repeat the same teachings but also to show their relevance to the new context.2
Other individuals, on the other hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions of the human community's search for some kind of meaning, an accumulated source of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activi
Other individuals, on the
other hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions of the human community's search for some kind of meaning, an accumulated source of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activi
other hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions
of the human community's search for some
kind of meaning, an accumulated source
of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activities.
Also I'm most
of the time very good at judging
others to some
kind of standard that I expect people to live by,
meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some
kind of control over them.
The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders
of the process perspective — specifically I
mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a
kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility
of being established.2 On the
other side, a number
of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question
of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.
I
mean the burning passion
of lived awareness that we occupy a precarious existence on this planet together with the soil and its flowers, the water and its fishes, the air and its birds, the fire and energy sources; that our fellow human beings are truly brothers and sisters with whom it is better always to make love - justice than war; and that gentleness lasts longer and touches more deeply than
other kinds of power.
But it may depend also upon our ability to separate from the image some
kinds of meanings that may have become attached to it and which conflict with
meanings of other important images that we wish to retain.
There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage
of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part
of the dialectical process
of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers
of all religions and the
other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all
of the concerned activists, we will develop a
kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all
of our specie.The great concern
of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism
means we will be One with God.
the belief on the existence
of the devil was concieved by theologians
of the past thousands
of years, there was no
other way
of explaining the bad experiences
of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the
kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part
of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part
of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part
of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality
of the universe ahead
of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part
of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point
of not believing the practices
of the past, but it does not
mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part
of their learning process.
This greeting was not
meant in a purely empty sense, the way we say «good morning» without having the least interest in what
kind of day the
other person will have, and as one could, then and today, say «Shalom» in a completely empty headed way.
And certainly there are
other kinds of prayer that can have
meaning for us: prayers for guidance, prayers
of praise, prayers whose goal is meditation on God or a feeling
of union with God.
He does not
mean the feigned affection that sometimes passes for love in the church, but the genuine article — the
kind of love Jesus has always shown for his disciples, the
kind of love that a mother normally shows for her children, the
kind of love that stands ready to lay down one's life for the
other.
So, it's that
kind of find, which doesn't necessarily
mean this isn't a Beatles song, but there's really no way to prove it one way or the
other until Sir Paul weighs in.
If, for our purposes, Cotton Mather can stand as a
kind of archetype
of Puritanism, with his very considerable impulsive energy kept in tight control and consecrated with
meaning by its service to the divine plan, Benjamin Franklin may serve, as he has for so many
others, as an archetype
of the worldly American.
Among
other topics, Volf discusses faith in the public square, and asks what
kind of religious conviction will be able to give
meaning to human lives and help people seek the common good.
The alleged subordination
of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political
meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting
other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom
of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting
of the reality
of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay
of action and reflection) as the only criterion
of faith, so that the notion
of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
Spirituality can be about the advancement
of the human spirit and that in itself can
mean personal growth, becoming more in touch with our surroundings, with the energy around us, with
other people, being
kind to
others... etc etc..
Speaking
of her call for «muscular liberalism» in the face
of some religious schools promoting their views over
others», Calvert said: «muscular liberalism shouldn't
mean some
kind of aggressive secularism - and that's the danger.
Excellent article from my perspective, which is that true Christianity (
meaning the
kind of Christianity Christ himself would have promoted) and many (not all
of course) modern offshoots
of it are so different from each
other.
So the word «
other» in v. 34 I believe is
meaning another
of different
kind, maybe
meaning different
kind of gender?
Anyone who is simply behaving because
of the threat
of damnation or the promise
of heaven has been bribed or extorted for their good behavior which
means they are the worst
kind of people, those with no morals
of their own, no empathy for
others and no love.
The reason it is so often a matter
of dispute is that people differ in what they
mean when they use the word, and since deep emotions are tied in with the conviction that the Bible is inspired, to doubt the
kind of inspiration one believes in is apt to seem like rejecting the Bible outright or making it no different from any
other book.
here's the
kind of people they are: they say «JW are the only Chrisitan group trying there best to do Gods will
mean while the
other called «christians» do only Gods will when is convenient for them.
On the
other hand, there is a bewildering variety
of ways in which Christians have interpreted the
meaning of moral action, and the
kind of expectations for man's life in history which it involves.
If Hartshorne's speaking here
of «religious experience» seems to refer to some special
kind of experience in contrast to
other kinds or to experience generally, this is not his
meaning.
We need context and interpretation, and sometimes that
means we need historical insight or
other kinds of analysis that comes only from a lot
of study.»
The global ubiquity
of social media
means that kids are able to interact with
other kids from all
kinds of countries, ethnicities and religions.
For me, Christianity
means fighting for
others» rights — yes, including the rights
of GLBT people — and being the
kind of person that
others can rely on.
I am grateful to the Penick Lectureship Committee for the invitation to deliver these lectures on «The
Meaning of Christian Worship»; to Bishop Baker for his
kind hospitality; and to
others who entertained me during a pleasant week in Greensboro.
That show
of maturity and sensitivity by the Prophet Muhammad is the
kind of example needed here, he did not kowtow because he was weak, same way the organizers, if they should choose another site, by no
means shows weakness, instead it shows maturity and sensitivity to what
others feel about what is going on.
In
other words, in the cross and resurrection story, the bond between the
meaning of the story and what Jesus did is very tight, whereas in the story
of the woman caught in adultery (John 8: 1 - 11), the story is true whether or not it actually occurred, because it shows us the
kind of person that Jesus was.
Hartshorne and
others hold becoming to be (a
kind of) being, but
other interpreters
of Whitehead argue convincingly that «being is constituted by becoming» (Process 23)
means that it is produced by becoming: Jorge Luis Nobo, «Whitehead's Principle
of Process.»
In the conception
of the physical as «acting,» on the
other hand, change
of other kinds in addition to locomotive change are admitted, so that a mechanistic analysis must accordingly be only
of an aspect
of physical acting, which
means that since it leaves out
of account
other aspects or features
of change or motion, it is an abstraction.