Sentences with phrase «other kinds of meanings»

Dazzling and often quite humorous, Morris's drawings show her special manner of using formal means to prod and pry at other kinds of meaning, be they connotative, emotional, or literal.

Not exact matches

The pressure in this case is coming from brokers who want to set up their own virtual office websites (VOWs)-- essentially searchable online databases similar to Realtor.ca — and furnish the sites with the same kind of details (mainly negotiated sale prices) they can pull from MLS and give to clients through other means.
«Every other country in the world has some kind of securities law,» Santori said, «so just because you're trying to avoid the U.S. securities law it doesn't mean you [avoid] the rest of the world's securities law.»
These aren't the kind of hacks that mean tech - savvy folks need to change their login credentials, but precursors to something far more serious: potentially devastating and life - threatening infrastructure disruptions that could leave thousands or millions of people without electricity or other utilities.
Finally, in - kind income is supposed to be taxed in most instances, so removing the loophole means tuition waivers are treated like other forms of in - kind income which is an equity issue.
And when I go back through my archives, these are the kinds of gifts that really mean something now, the ones that are unexpirable, that take on more meaning the longer you keep them and the more you share their story with others.
In my last post in this series, I observed that an economy's «base» money serves as the «raw material» that commercial banks and other private - market financial intermediaries employ in «producing» deposits of various kinds that can themselves serve as means of exchange.
The fact that the demand for credit is distinct from the demand for money, and that the two things can change independently, means, among other things, that interest rates, which adjust to «clear» markets for various kinds of credit, can not also be counted on to «clear» the market for money balances.
This reality and the conditions that pertain to it mean that you can float on the seas of authority bloat that fuels your vertical, but the efforts that it requires is simply not worth it to build any kind of sustained ranking, as too many levers must float in your favor — such as the website where your link was originally hosted maintaining it's weight before being pillaged by other SEOs capable of basic competitive research — or your competitors being bad enough to not have an SEO who has heard of competitive research — in order for it to be a worthwhile strategy.
Ideally, when it comes to which sectors you're investing in, you'll have a nice mix of both defensive and cyclical stocks — meaning companies that should hold up well in all kinds of markets (like utilities) and others that can be expected to perform particularly well in certain economic environments (like hotels and restaurants, which benefit when the economy is booming).
For me, it's amazing, you know I have to kind of pinch myself, but on the other hand, you know God's a faithful God, and it's not surprising in that sense, if you see what I mean.
I've been to funerals and encountered this kind of prejudice where those leading the service insisted you must be a member of their religion to get over grief, and you can only really talk about it in the language of the Bible, no other discussion has any meaning.
I mean simply that I expect any writing to make literal sense before making sense of any other kind.
Moreover, to say that sameness is one of the laws of violence is to say that, on the one hand, violence has no limits and, on the other, that condoning violence means condoning every kind of violence.
For starters, that kind of principle will inevitably mean that those who study the bible beliving in it will think it says something completely different than others who read it.
Here I mean by it that Christianity must be accepted in its revealed totality — accepted absolutely, intransigently, without cultural or philosophical or any other kind of accommodation or adaptation.)
You mean, kind of like it's wrong to impose traffic laws on people, and it's wrong to make it against the law to murder other people, and it's wrong to beat people up?
Great as is the significance of the emergence of self - conscious persons within the very fabric of the universe for any reflection on its possible meaning and purpose, this must not lead us to underplay the significance also of the rest of the universe and of all other living organisms to God as Creator — even though we are able to depict only in imagination the kind of delight that God may be conceived to have in the fecund multiplicity and variety or created forms.
It does mean, however, that, as this example from the Old Testament indicates, the Easter appearances were not dissimilar in kind from other phenomena in the history of religious experience.
Orthodoxy is being able not only to repeat the same teachings but also to show their relevance to the new context.2 Other individuals, on the other hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions of the human community's search for some kind of meaning, an accumulated source of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activiOther individuals, on the other hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions of the human community's search for some kind of meaning, an accumulated source of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activiother hand, interpret religious beliefs as merely expressions of the human community's search for some kind of meaning, an accumulated source of information built up over the years as the community reflected on its life and activities.
Also I'm most of the time very good at judging others to some kind of standard that I expect people to live by, meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some kind of control over them.
The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.
I mean the burning passion of lived awareness that we occupy a precarious existence on this planet together with the soil and its flowers, the water and its fishes, the air and its birds, the fire and energy sources; that our fellow human beings are truly brothers and sisters with whom it is better always to make love - justice than war; and that gentleness lasts longer and touches more deeply than other kinds of power.
But it may depend also upon our ability to separate from the image some kinds of meanings that may have become attached to it and which conflict with meanings of other important images that we wish to retain.
There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.
This greeting was not meant in a purely empty sense, the way we say «good morning» without having the least interest in what kind of day the other person will have, and as one could, then and today, say «Shalom» in a completely empty headed way.
And certainly there are other kinds of prayer that can have meaning for us: prayers for guidance, prayers of praise, prayers whose goal is meditation on God or a feeling of union with God.
He does not mean the feigned affection that sometimes passes for love in the church, but the genuine article — the kind of love Jesus has always shown for his disciples, the kind of love that a mother normally shows for her children, the kind of love that stands ready to lay down one's life for the other.
So, it's that kind of find, which doesn't necessarily mean this isn't a Beatles song, but there's really no way to prove it one way or the other until Sir Paul weighs in.
If, for our purposes, Cotton Mather can stand as a kind of archetype of Puritanism, with his very considerable impulsive energy kept in tight control and consecrated with meaning by its service to the divine plan, Benjamin Franklin may serve, as he has for so many others, as an archetype of the worldly American.
Among other topics, Volf discusses faith in the public square, and asks what kind of religious conviction will be able to give meaning to human lives and help people seek the common good.
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
Spirituality can be about the advancement of the human spirit and that in itself can mean personal growth, becoming more in touch with our surroundings, with the energy around us, with other people, being kind to others... etc etc..
Speaking of her call for «muscular liberalism» in the face of some religious schools promoting their views over others», Calvert said: «muscular liberalism shouldn't mean some kind of aggressive secularism - and that's the danger.
Excellent article from my perspective, which is that true Christianity (meaning the kind of Christianity Christ himself would have promoted) and many (not all of course) modern offshoots of it are so different from each other.
So the word «other» in v. 34 I believe is meaning another of different kind, maybe meaning different kind of gender?
Anyone who is simply behaving because of the threat of damnation or the promise of heaven has been bribed or extorted for their good behavior which means they are the worst kind of people, those with no morals of their own, no empathy for others and no love.
The reason it is so often a matter of dispute is that people differ in what they mean when they use the word, and since deep emotions are tied in with the conviction that the Bible is inspired, to doubt the kind of inspiration one believes in is apt to seem like rejecting the Bible outright or making it no different from any other book.
here's the kind of people they are: they say «JW are the only Chrisitan group trying there best to do Gods will mean while the other called «christians» do only Gods will when is convenient for them.
On the other hand, there is a bewildering variety of ways in which Christians have interpreted the meaning of moral action, and the kind of expectations for man's life in history which it involves.
If Hartshorne's speaking here of «religious experience» seems to refer to some special kind of experience in contrast to other kinds or to experience generally, this is not his meaning.
We need context and interpretation, and sometimes that means we need historical insight or other kinds of analysis that comes only from a lot of study.»
The global ubiquity of social media means that kids are able to interact with other kids from all kinds of countries, ethnicities and religions.
For me, Christianity means fighting for others» rights — yes, including the rights of GLBT people — and being the kind of person that others can rely on.
I am grateful to the Penick Lectureship Committee for the invitation to deliver these lectures on «The Meaning of Christian Worship»; to Bishop Baker for his kind hospitality; and to others who entertained me during a pleasant week in Greensboro.
That show of maturity and sensitivity by the Prophet Muhammad is the kind of example needed here, he did not kowtow because he was weak, same way the organizers, if they should choose another site, by no means shows weakness, instead it shows maturity and sensitivity to what others feel about what is going on.
In other words, in the cross and resurrection story, the bond between the meaning of the story and what Jesus did is very tight, whereas in the story of the woman caught in adultery (John 8: 1 - 11), the story is true whether or not it actually occurred, because it shows us the kind of person that Jesus was.
Hartshorne and others hold becoming to be (a kind of) being, but other interpreters of Whitehead argue convincingly that «being is constituted by becoming» (Process 23) means that it is produced by becoming: Jorge Luis Nobo, «Whitehead's Principle of Process.»
In the conception of the physical as «acting,» on the other hand, change of other kinds in addition to locomotive change are admitted, so that a mechanistic analysis must accordingly be only of an aspect of physical acting, which means that since it leaves out of account other aspects or features of change or motion, it is an abstraction.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z