Sentences with phrase «other kinds of questions»

The starter can be used as a template for other kind of questions and answers.Other topics covered: Numbers

Not exact matches

Now others are sifting the data searching for answers to all kinds of questions.

In response to a shareholder question about what could be done to speed up the glacial pace of adoption of electric car production by other car companies, Musk said he was «playing with doing something fairly significant on this front which would be kind of controversial with respect to Tesla's patents.»

As a number of observers have pointed out (including Fortune), the question isn't so much whether Facebook filters out certain kinds of news — something that newspapers and other media entities do every day without much scrutiny.

As artificial intelligence makes bots more capable, and as companies that use Slack integrate it more and more into their other software systems, he says, «you could ask a bot the kind of question you would ask a really competent chief of staff who had the ability to read every single message in every single channel,» he says.

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

There's no question that TV - style content — in other words, video of all kinds, however it is delivered to viewers or consumers — is going to be just fine.

«We all kind of looked at each other and said,... «This begs the question, Do we need to go public?»»

Try to remember the kinds of questions they ask, how they follow up on the other person's answers, and even how they make use of silence.

Ingenious businesspeople are no longer using these programs just to answer «what if» questions for budgeting or other kinds of financial planning.

Subject to any applicable terms and conditions set forth in Realty Income's Privacy Policy, any communication or other material that you send to Realty Income through the Internet or post on a Realty Income website by electronic mail or otherwise, such as any questions, comments, suggestions or the like, is and will be deemed to be non-confidential and Realty Income shall have no obligation of any kind with respect to such information.

Still other believers elect to ignore rational questions and criticisms of their belief and continue to remain in the dark, unable to provide any kind of defense for their belief aside from «it just feels right» or «I know it in my heart».

You say you are Christian, and you show it by your action, you are kind when you address others questions, you do not attack, but answer to the best of your ability.

On the other hand, those who believe that there are questions of greatest importance for human existence that are not amenable to the kind of inquiry we associate with the natural sciences, will be more sympathetic toward theology.

So in I Corinthians, having asked how the dead are raised, he attempts to answer the question by saying, on the one hand, that there is some kind of real, though indefinable, continuity between our present bodily mode of existence and the life beyond death, and, on the other, that there is discontinuity also.

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

The former would relate to the question of the completeness of Whitehead's system, and the latter would concern the justification of Whitehead's particular delineation of these kinds vis - à - vis that of other systems.

Finally, in the fourth place there is the question of ontology, of just what kind of world it is in which gift without return and the death of the other linked to my own death gives rise to subjectivity and ensures that as subjective beings we are first and foremost ethical creatures — even before we are erotic creatures or curious creatures.

Both questions lead in the same direction, toward the possibility of a provisional and qualified answer: if the character of happening only once is held to belong to the truth and measure of all things in their very reality, then there is indeed an essence which more than any other satisfies this truth - criterion, and this is the pure essence of time: time taken in itself, or pure movement — movement irrespective of any possible differentiation into the different kinds of movement.

Actually, one does not have to imagine that, for these are precisely the kinds of questions discussed at length by rational choice religion scholars such as Iannaccone, Lawrence Young, Mark Chaves, and others.

There's one park nearby which is kind of the «hippie» park, and that's where I find the moms who are more prone to talk to me and not just ask how old he is, what potty training issues we've had, or other «parent shield» questions that allow us to chat without ever actually talking.

Cobb does not attempt a comprehensive answer to this question, but he does proffer two quite different kinds of explanation — one historical, the other theological.

They usually take place outside the Divinity School, and they are intended, not for specialists in religious studies of any kind, but for a general audience of people, mainly, but by no means exclusively, undergraduate, whose courses of study may lie in other fields, but who are interested in listening to a non-technical presentation of questions with which theologians are concerned and perhaps also in taking part in discussions which are arranged to follow the lectures.

The central question for traditional philosophy is to determine the kinds of things that are and how they are related to each other.

And if one wishes to speculate that there is some other kind of matter beneath the sub-atomic level, the question would still arise in what sense it could be called material or physical without also being ordered in some way or other.

It's the kind of question which, in any other context, would seem vastly inappropriate from someone you had just been introduced to.

Biggest question I have for you — I noticed in one of your other posts that you were using the tahini in the can, which I just tried yestu (usually use the kind in the jar) and I could NOT get it stirred!

Question, are chickpeas safer than say other kinds of beans?

I really appreciate this kind of feedback, really makes me keep on doing more:) Let me know if you have any questions for the other recipes you will be trying and hope you will share my blog with your friends:)

after being in this kind of relationship for all this years you start to question everything about yourself you think you must be too fat or too ugly for a few years I thought what was the point in leaving him if my own husband doesn't want who else is going to want me I must of had the conversation about how our situation was affecting me over 1000 times when he did bother to come near me like once every 5 - 8 months he'd say it wasn't enjoyable for him because I was very awkward but he never understood the reason I was uncomfortable how are you supposed to feel good about yourself when you know your husband would rather look at other women online

Yes, this kind of question, along with many others, are making menu planning a crazy situation right now.

It was the ideal time and place for me; I got over my feeling of isolation, talked to other new mothers about my new life, asked all kinds of questions, attended workshops and information sessions, met a lactation specialist and did the thing I liked best: the weekly weigh - in!

CATHERINE: And so I do, so I've been doing this weekly series called The Momma Interviews, and so it's been kind of fun just to get you know, advice and um, support from other moms, you know»cause I think a lot of times we're in this by ourselves or we're the only ones that feel a certain way, so what would you say um, so one of the questions I ask is, what do you feel is your greatest personal struggle with the experience of motherhood.

On the other hand, if you're straight up with your questions about open adoption and the kind of relationship you would like to have with her in the future, a expectant mother may find you easier to talk to than an adoptive family that doesn't have any of those issues.

That includes providing intellectual stimulation, talking about school, being available to answer homework questions, and other kinds of attention that can be given even if you're not the room parent.

Therefore, if you are looking for a midwife, ask questions to find out if an available midwife (or other caregiver) will be able to meet your needs and provide the kind of care you seek.

By teaching active listening, simple introductions, how to read other people's body language, what kind of questions to ask and then how to excuse herself politely from a conversation, you are teaching your child a social skill that she can use for life.

It's basically kind of an online form that you can access through your app, compose questions and help out other mammas, and there are also rewards each time you post questions.

So I think it's kind of knowing yourself and knowing that there are people to help I think is also... you know and if you got the question many, many, many other moms could have had the same questions.

SUNNY GAULT: Awesome, and mammas last question and any last words of advise that you would give to other moms out there that are kind of going through this right now?

When I looked into it further, I found that there was some really helpful medical research that addresses those kinds of questions and that's information that I want to get out there to other parents of excessively crying babies.

This kind of question appears regularly at Travel Stackexchange, with people complaining that they have been denied boarding (not only towards USA, but any other country3) due to visa issues.

The Christian conception of marriage is one: the other is the quite different question — how far Christians, if they are voters or Members of Parliament, ought to try to force their views of marriage on the rest of the community... There ought to be two distinct kinds of marriage: one governed by the State with the rules enforced on all citizens, the other governed by the Church with rules enforced by her on her own members.

Appointment is an alternative to elections, but it is unlikely, I think, that existing political elites would be likely to appoint delegates truly willing to ask sufficiently radical questions about what kind of constitutional design might best fit the United States (or any other country) in the 21st century.

In his Question Time performance, David Cameron showed the kind of fluency and ability to engage with an audience that seems to elude him in televised confrontations with other leaders.

Would a citation to another source, like the Democracy Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index, be a sufficient response to this question, or are you looking for some other kind of analysis?

Stock the site with a bunch of on - topic, expert questions and answers, so that when the site opens to the public, it's already pre-populated with a bunch of the kind of content that will attract other experts.

There are other places on the internet you can have this kind of debate I simply want the question answered properly.

@DavidGrinberg - That's a great question, but it's really the domain of the answerer to describe that what other kinds of citizenship could be.

«We think that beyond question, that the kinds of things that we alleged and proved in both of those cases and in other cases that were being challenged now were squarely within what the McDonnell opinion said was still a violation.