Sentences with phrase «other kinds of rights»

ABN: When we first talked, you mentioned that artists might also need to protect other kinds of rights, such as trade secrets or patents.

Not exact matches

And you look at Dicks, you look at Delta, and others that have kind of joined and I think that in the case of Delta it had an impact for them on their bottom line, right?

In other words, we need to hire the best people we can find, and prepare them through the right kind of focused training and development programs.

To get at that you'll need to use the right kind of language, whether it's a guarantee, testimonials or some other tactic, to assure people you have what they need.

Beyond being an incredible song, its chorus became a rallying cry of protesters in the United States — «a kind of comfort that people of color and other oppressed communities desperately need all too often: the hope — the feeling — that despite tensions in this country growing worse and worse, in the long run, we're all gon» be all right,» as Slate culture writer Aisha Harris put it.

A lot of people badmouth each other before competitions, there's words that get exchanged here and there, and then you kind of fight at the table, right?

They do not have independent goals or rights or feelings that warrant our extension to them the same kind of courtesies that we would to other human beings.»

Similarly, the Facebook chief seemed at one point to favor regulation for Facebook and other internet giants — at least the «right» kind of rules, he said, such as ones that require online political ads to disclose who paid for them.

Sapphire Ventures and its affiliates disclaim all warranties and representations of any kind with regard to this website or its content, including any implied warranties of merchantability, non-infringement of third - party rights, freedom from viruses or other harmful code, or fitness for a particular purpose.

Nobody knows exactly how the referendum will be worded, or right now whether there even will be a referendum, because, as you also noted earlier, the other politicians in Greece are now jockeying for position and are trying to get rid of Papandreou and to replace him, in a very opportunistic mood, to prevent any kind of a referendum happening at all.

Additionally, people were blasting BitConnect on all other kinds of social media, including reddit, right after the crash, saying that this was expected, as it was obvious that BitConnect was a Ponzi Scheme.

This moment of checking your gut, however, is as good a time as any to consider whether you have the right proportion of your money in stocks versus other options like cash, bonds or real estate that don't experience this kind of volatility or may not rise or fall in tandem with stocks.

Given the U.S. veto power by Wall Street and the insistence that right - wing anti-labor ideologues (usually French) be appointed head of the IMF, a new organization representing the kind of economic logic outlined by Keynes, Harold Moulton and others in the 1920s is necessary.

And this point dovetails with the other point as far as since we don't pretend to know the precise timing of when bubbles kind of unwind or when the busts will finally reach a bottom, the idea is that we can actually be in the right quartile of activity, in other words I never try to catch the very top of a bubble, I don't try to ride things to the very end, and similarly I don't mind catching falling knifes.

It certainly helps the CEO whose job among other things is to build the right kind of culture for the Company's overall success.

RELEASE AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY: By participating in any Aberdeen Group survey, entrants agree that Aberdeen Group and any other applicable sponsor, and its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, representatives, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, advertising, public relations, promotional, fulfillment and marketing, web site providers, web masters, Aberdeen Group and their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents (The «Released Entities»), will have no liability whatsoever for, and shall be held harmless by entrants against any liability for any injuries, losses or damages of any kind to persons, including personal injury or death, or property resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from acceptance, possession, misuse or use of a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise deliverOF LIABILITY: By participating in any Aberdeen Group survey, entrants agree that Aberdeen Group and any other applicable sponsor, and its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, representatives, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, advertising, public relations, promotional, fulfillment and marketing, web site providers, web masters, Aberdeen Group and their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents (The «Released Entities»), will have no liability whatsoever for, and shall be held harmless by entrants against any liability for any injuries, losses or damages of any kind to persons, including personal injury or death, or property resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from acceptance, possession, misuse or use of a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise deliverof any kind to persons, including personal injury or death, or property resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from acceptance, possession, misuse or use of a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise deliverof a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise deliverof privacy, or merchandise delivery.

These types of ra nts lead down the path of religious per secution and have been the same kinds of words during horrible religiously motivated at roci ties — ki ll ing of people because their flavor of Christian faith didn't meet the standard of some other self - right eous mob.

Still other believers elect to ignore rational questions and criticisms of their belief and continue to remain in the dark, unable to provide any kind of defense for their belief aside from «it just feels right» or «I know it in my heart».

it reminds me the way Michael Frost (and many others in other words, like NT Wright, Bonhoeffer, and even Ellul) explain the kingdom of God as being some kind of a «trailer» for the Kingdom that is coming, and christians would be already living the the Kingdom reality right here in this world, where it seems to the eye that there is no kingdom of God at all.

Parents were put to a cruel choice: either give up their plans for a religious education or forfeit their child's right to the kind of remedial education program Congress provides for all other children.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

He said the date was chosen to remind others that «we need to keep fighting for our rights and be independent from all kinds of oppression.»

Robert Louis Stevenson said once that there are two kinds of people, one kind «inclining to think all things rather wrong,» the other inclining to suppose all sorts of conduct «right enough for practical purposes.»

If you need a government contract, sanctioned by the government and granted by the government to make sure you are not discriminated against — for rights to make decisions in a hospital or to pass on your SS benefits or for other human rights — work towards that kind of thing.

This is right On Jeremy, when any kind of theology discussions starts I run the other way and just go make disciples, at least I am accomplishing something then.

Daniel I think that you are right that many times a person's unresolved past produces the kind of dysfunctionality to where even though they desire to do good, they end up harming others due to subconscious beliefs about themselves.

human beings, «born free and equal in dignity and rights,» are entitled to human rights «without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

It alone, of all the kinds of being, enjoys a sort of logical autonomy, whereby it can be said to «be» in its own right, whereas all the other kinds of being have an intrinsic dependence on Entity for their own being.

The other day, at a small group I attended, someone expressed concern for me because there is a lot of stuff going on in our community right now: illnesses, the threat of death, marriages in serious trouble, depression... the kind of things that take time to deal with.

The wrong kind of christian is the one that every other christian can place a blame / fault on, and that makes Obama the right christian to be in position of being the president.

a right kinda christian is one who is po'ed at every other kind of people or nitpick with them — like the conservative talking heads.

You seem to be thinking that you have some kind of right to tell others what they believe, and to what extent.

My relatively nonpartisan definition of JUDICIAL ACTIVISM has to do with an objection to «natural rights» or any other kind of «rights / liberty» jurisprudence — whether it flows from Randy Barnett or Rawls or Hadley Arkes.

2) you said «You seem to be thinking that you have some kind of right to tell others what they believe, and to what extent.»

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms of this Declaration without distinction of any kind such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status».

There is always an author, an editor, or a performer who can represent every person and every kind of life, thus creating a great company of others who remind one that he is not alone and who give him assurance that what he does and approves is right.

However, in the rural areas in the northeast and the north, there is a totally different world where people suffer from economic deprivation and environmental destruction - in other words, all kinds of human rights violations.

If, instead of gospel, what is proclaimed in the churches is nothing more than the kinds of «musts» and «shoulds» and «ought to's» that one can hear from many other quarters — along with the ubiquitous language of «rights» — then we can not expect church people to be any more receptive to such exhortations than are their counter parts in society at large.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

In other words, the kind of person who gives Christians a bad name, and why so many people abhor people like you who uses religion to try and quash people's rights.

By coordinating the efforts of the Institute and Journal with his other organizations — the far - right Liberty Lobby, the Noontide Press, American Mercury magazine, and the newsletter Spotlight — Carto established a kind of anti - Semitism / Holocaust denial conglomerate.

And lets get right to the point: regardless of whether divinity is real, people who embrace these kinds of behaviors are, in reality, using their god as a rhetorical / emotional weapon to bully others into social conformity.

For me, Christianity means fighting for others» rights — yes, including the rights of GLBT people — and being the kind of person that others can rely on.

Christians are experts in telling each other they are «not the right kind of Christian».

According to the fundies if you live in India or China and you are a kind loving, compassionate person, and you try to make your community a better place out of love for others and because you know it's the right thing to do, if you haven't said those words, you will be going straight to hell.

People who grow up civic are taught how to relate meaningfully to others, to put the good of the group first, to consume wisely and to use amusement sparingly, and to be concerned for rights of others, for their environment, and for the future of human kind.

Developed through the four cardinal virtues — prudence (practical wisdom), justice, courage, and temperance (perhaps better styled today, «self - command»)-- freedom is the method by which we become the kind of people our noblest instincts incline us to be: the kind of people who can, among other possibilities, build free and virtuous societies in which the rights of all are acknowledged, respected, and protected in law.

We generally have, in this country, a notion of what being «kind and loving to others» means, but where does your definition of «good» and «right» come from?

In 1832 Pope Gregory XVI (followed by Pope Pius IX) declared that it was insane to teach that «the liberty of conscience and of worship is the peculiar right of every man... and that citizens have the right to all kinds of liberty... by which they may be enabled to manifest openly and publicly their ideas, by word of mouth, through the press or by any other means».4 In 1864 Pope Pius IX proceeded to draw up a list of the principal errors of the age which were to be condemned.

Almost all other virgin coconut oils on the market are mass - produced and do not take this kind of attention to detail that begins with choosing the right nuts.