Sentences with phrase «other labels people»

Not exact matches

«He... labels the others, you know, and denigrates people who don't, who aren't pure in how they are.

While he doesn't necessarily have the intrigue of some of the other top prospects, some people have labeled him a «safe pick» — someone that could stick around the NBA for a long time.

«I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others, for blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, reducing trade and, in some cases around the world, even cutting access to the internet,» Zuckerberg said during a Facebook conference in April.

«What other people label or might try to call failure, I have learned is just God's way of pointing you in a new direction» - Oprah Winfrey

Where other companies supply their stores with headquarters - authored mission and values statements, Life Is Good provides loose - leaf binders labeled «Fuel» and stuffed with thank - yous from people who have taken solace or inspiration from its message.

When meeting a new acquaintance, the best way to cement your relationship is to express your admiration for the other person, but fail to do so convincingly and you'll be instantly labeled a kiss - up and disliked accordingly.

He's assuming people will realize from a label that GMO foods are safe, cheaper, and better than traditional farmed foods and choose to buy them over other foods.

Those are other labels that people think signify a food is healthier, but once again the labels mean nothing.

[Haute couture] clothes are generally not wearable, and because they are art forms, it's a way for these labels and designers to get their name out there, and for people to regard them as being very special designers, and therefore to look at their other, more wearable, clothes.

Others deemed it so horrible they just couldn't look away, labeling the selfies a group of people took in the aftermath of a gas explosion as «disaster porn.»

It will also provide a white - label version that other companies can run on their own servers, the person added.»

I shun labels of all kinds but am identified by others as a feminist, so often people will ask me if I think God is a man or a woman.

Some other groups have labeled as amnesty any measure that would give people who are in the country illegally the opportunity to become U.S. citizens.

The problem is that the Christians have labeled all non-christians as wicked and evil and they want to be free to live without non-christians around them, so in essence, they want the freedom to stomp and grind other peoples freedoms into the ground.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

Naming / defining is an exercise of power over others, so perhaps naming other persons made in the Divine image, with the potential to become godlike, by labeling them «believers» or «unbelievers» is a failure to see all people as God sees them, children of the one true God.

BillyD said: «Without arbitrarily labeling as mass mental illness, how do explain the personally experiential, spiritual revelations of countless people throughout the centuries, many by people previously not convinced by the faith of others?»

Don't need a label, already have one given to me at birth:) If other people want to pay the price of admission, more power to them.

Without arbitrarily labeling as mass mental illness, how do explain the personally experiential, spiritual revelations of countless people throughout the centuries, many by people previously not convinced by the faith of others?

I label people ill for talking to and believing in imaginary creatures, especially to the degree they then insist others live their lives by that imaginary friend's pretend rules.

I don't need a lot of left hand view and right hand view categorizing and have myself labeled in some other way again that some people have recently devised.

Isn't the person who assigns the «intolerance» label actually displaying a similar intolerance of that other person's belief?

I wish you wouldn't label other people.

If you persist in labeling yourself as a special separate group of people, how can you expect other people not in your group to understand that you are equal when you refuse to do it??? And after all the effort we've all put into it????? But I stand outside your group and ask that you simply become everyone along with everyone, free and equal and not separate — not ever again — ever...!

The other labels for people groups, such as slave vs. free, man vs. woman, etc., only serve to divide.

I only meant that as a «self - designation» both gay and straight people need to stop labeling each other and classifying themselves by their sexual orientation, and maybe seek to classify themselves the way Paul instructed people to do, as being of the class that is «in Christ.»

People use labels as shortcuts to avoid taking the time to get to know and understand others.

Its not bigotry becasue people disagree with your lifestyle — get over yourself and quit labeling things incorrectly to try and bolster your position and push your beliefs on others.

I'm glad to see that others here are labeling people with comments such as this as «trolls».

People seem to like to be part of a group and to label the other group as bad It is a little sad.

BARBARIC??? Before we label «Barbaric» other countries system we should see how «Barbaric» is for the US, corporate and financial system NOT to give a damn about the real American working people who support [by being enslaved and blackmailed] the wealth of those who, instead, destroyed the economy and what was hardly achieved in 60 years!

The thing that people want to exclude themselves from, be it the Christian label, church, religion, or even the institution, can directly relate and feed on the other, thereby creating a false dichotomy.

People who claim the «Conservative» label rarely agree on everything, in many cases they differ radically, William F. Buckley, for example, supported legalization of marijuana and cocaine, which other people who think themselves conservatives call the height of liberPeople who claim the «Conservative» label rarely agree on everything, in many cases they differ radically, William F. Buckley, for example, supported legalization of marijuana and cocaine, which other people who think themselves conservatives call the height of liberpeople who think themselves conservatives call the height of liberalism.

The person they were is gone and all anyone can see is the label given by others.

It's easy to put that label on some people, but I also find that different people bring out different characteristics in each other.

But when we see the people on the other side of the debate as the enemy (by calling them names, labeling them or demeaning their convictions), we miss the point of what «fighting for our faith» is supposed to be about in the first place.

Wounded people hurt others and out of their hurt, they judge and label other; which I believe gives them a feeling of control.

Others, however, put the observance of the sabbath day above the welfare of the people who observe it and labeled Jesus a sinner for violating it.

Our and «All» Creations ever being created by God, a name above all mannerisms to - be-named such as Jehova or Elohim or any other name calling and / or labellings other then the most simplstic and of God should all be stricken from all peoples» minds and doctrines and teachings!

It takes a closed mind to universally discredit an entire people - group based on nothing other than a label.

Greg Jones» first section, «Learning to Describe Actions, Persons, and the World: Social Contexts and Moral Judgments,» helps us understand what (and how very much) is at stake in this and other disputes over descriptive labels.

Just remember that they are people, not just Atheists, Agnostics, homosexuals, prostitutes, strippers, drunks, and other easy labels that can be used to define a person, and make them less than people.

When your social environment is encouraging you to make these labels the basis for loving some people and hating others, criticize your social environment and seek to change it.

Any comments that show hatred toward the Islamic community are indicative of blatant ignorance of the religion, culture, and its people, which is exactly why this show was created: to show «Islamaphobic» America that we are not hateful, war - driven extremists, suppressors of our women, or any other stereotypical label associated with Muslims.

This would be a much smaller set of people than she, at other places, seems to include as emerging (but without such a label put on either by themselves or others).

I find that labels so often get bogged down with other people's assumptions, they are hard to live with.

I'm not vegan, or even vegetarian, paleo, raw, gluten free or any other label that people like to put on food.

Tip: People with celiac disease or gluten sensitivity should use soy sauces that are labeled «gluten - free,» as soy sauce may contain wheat or other gluten - containing sweeteners and flavors.

Results from studies that only assess consumer preferences for different labelling systems, may be affected by other factors, including people's familiarity with a particular system and social desirability associated with particular responses, such as choosing the system that is seen to portray the most information.

People with celiac disease or gluten - sensitivity should use soy sauces that are labeled «gluten - free,» as soy sauce may contain wheat or other gluten - containing sweeteners and flavors.