«But I do think that Australia, along with
other liberal democracies around the world, have got to take the threat of foreign interference seriously.»
Question: Are there
any other liberal democracies that allow such scenarios?
It was only after I started to look into how controversial issues like abortion and divorce were handled in
other liberal democracies that I realized how my dean's slogan has been used not only to silence religiously grounded views, but to silence all opposition to abortion.
Inspired by conservative political pundit Ezra Levant «s book by the same name, the Ethical Oil website purports to «encourage people, businesses and governments to choose Ethical Oil from Canada, its oil sands and
other liberal democracies.»
Not exact matches
Restorative punishment, much like
other practices of reconciliation, retrieves the distinctive logic of a religious tradition and brings it to bear upon modern
liberal democracy.
Presidents from Truman through Clinton «operated on the ideological conviction that
liberal democracy is the only legitimate form of government and that
other forms of government are not only illegitimate but transitory.»
He seems to assume that Christian culture and politics in
other parts of the world can be understood through categories derived from the past 200 years of Western
liberal democracy and misses the fact that these communities have histories of their own.
The inability of the Gallicanist state to co-opt Catholicism's social energy exposed a tension inherent in
liberal democracy: between the people empowered as a sovereign whole, on one hand, and those partial societies of individuals which diversify the nation, on the
other.
Second,
liberal democracy is based on the principle that every adult is the political equal of every
other adult.
The government of a
liberal democracy is like every
other government in that it coerces its citizens in all kinds of ways for the common good — the dominant form of this coercion being taxation.
I think it is appropriate in our
liberal democracy for Christians, along with adherents of
other religions, to make decisions about political issues on the basis of whatever considerations they find true and relevant.
Liberals are right when they insist that regarding the poor as the equals of all
other citizens is essential to the incorporation of a viable welfare state within a robust
democracy.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Americans thought the world stage had been cleared for our benevolent power to lift
others to the broad, sunlit uplands of
liberal democracy and free - market prosperity.
It is important not to ascribe every positive aspect of modern history to the advent of
liberal democracy, simply because one followed the
other.
Others favour the model set out most credibly by American foreign policy expert John Hulsman, who advocates an ambitious global free trade area with a security element — effectively tying the world's
liberal democracies together, with Britain playing a significant new role within this new structure.
Rather than insisting that the current form of Western - type
liberal democracy is the ultimate form of governance for all societies, we need to envisage
other governance models that go one step beyond freedom and incorporate and uphold human dignity needs.
The tension between sovereign self - determination claims on the one hand and adherence to universal human rights principles on the
other is arguably a constitutive feature of
liberal democracy.
What this would suggest is that
liberal democracies do not fight each
other because they are part of the inner circle of an international society.
The main argument, of course, stipulates that
liberal democracies do not engage in wars against each
other.
The British parliamentary system, inspired by John Locke, Edmund Burke, John Stuart Mill and many
others who believed in a system of checks and balances to guarantee our liberties, has in the past been much admired as a model of
liberal democracy, one that has enabled the peaceful evolution that has been an almost unique part of our history.
The
Liberal Democrat answer — with its emphasis upon community politics, internal
democracy and federalism — has typically been very different to that offered by the
other parties.
By this time he was a
Liberal activist and became a public affairs consultant, among
other things advising emergent
democracies in Bosnia, Lithuania and Albania and also becoming director of an internet company.
These include the need for a purposively broad,
liberal and benevolent interpretation of the Constitution as a whole, so far as the language of the constitution would admit, having due regard to the underlying values and principles that need to be promoted to safeguarded our system of participatory
democracy, the principle that the constitution is a document sui generis, and allied to this, the principle that the constitution must be interpreted in the light of its own words, and not words found in some
other written constitution» (Writ No: JI / 15/2015 [unreported] pages 23 & 24).
Liberal groups have been hobbled by widespread reluctance among Democrats to support unlimited - spending groups, which have been criticized by President Obama and
others as unhealthy for
democracy.
Liberal groups MoveOn.org, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee,
Democracy for America, and Credo Action are pushing
other Democratic senators to sign the letter as well.
Yet in a
liberal democracy such as the United States, the proper ordering of those mechanisms is beset by paradox: if free citizens are to rule the state, does the state have a legitimate role in shaping their values and beliefs via its public schools, universities, and
other institutions?
Macedo charges that many critics of public education mistakenly assume that good citizens «spring full - blown from the soil of private freedom,» while
others, forgetting the «civic dimensions of political life,» define
liberal democracy exclusively in terms of individual liberties.
Whereas we imagine governments in
liberal democracies largely to respond to people's wishes, under the rubric of climate change and
other issues, government and its agencies increasingly seek to change behaviour and modify attitudes towards policies that have already been determined.
Now that the Sierra Club has joined with a coalition of environmental activist groups, labor unions, and
other left -
liberal groups to form the
Democracy Initiative, the Sierra Club has an even more powerful platform to promote its radical agenda.