Sentences with phrase «other love interest»

Rachel McAdams is basically Pepper Potts, Jane Foster, and any other love interest previously found in superhero films.
As the other love interest, Baker gets to play Guy as a smooth, charming guy, not the smarmy, totally unlikable womanizer he's used to playing or could have been written as.
M L: In terms of your other love interest, you got to reunite with your Defiance co-star Jamie Bell, which was fun for me as a viewer, thinking «Forest wife!»

Not exact matches

I love writing and researching and this career has given me countless opportunities to learn about interesting topics and share them with thousands of other people.
They also are in negotiations with other advisors who would be interested in using Hammond's firm as a succession partner to protect the value of their practices, both for their loved ones and their clients.
Other times, tech might distract you from important tasks, spending quality time with loved ones or activities that would serve your best interests.
If the parties can find a shared interest, they can remind each other during the negotiation to state that interest, such as «we love each other», and move on to solve the problem.
That's why I find it interesting to hear Christians commonly describe their love of Jesus as being more powerful than any other form of love they've ever experienced.
First, I think both groups share a mutual concern in treating others with respect, love and dignity.We share an interest in the Golden Rule.
Prayer in the smaller and still more intimate group of two or three friends who love and understand each other well enough to share all their other interests can be a doorway to blessedness.
When each member of the family, though loving the other members, goes his own way without much concern for the interests of the others and without their doing anything in common, there is no deep foundation on which to build a common life.
The stress on virtue that we have already noticed — Jefferson's «love of others,» Franklin's «zeal for the public good» — is very close to the biblical archetype, while the stress on self - interest that is also common among the founding fathers suggests the powerful influence of the utilitarian archetype.
Fundamentally, Christian spirituality is not about attaining an altered state of consciousness but about widening the range of genuine caring about others, so that we act for their interest not out of duty but out of love.
And also HeavenSent, marriage can be for two people who love each other and don't wish to be fruitful and multiply, and who have no interest in what the Bible says on the subject.
First and foremost, it poses the question of whether we are willing to risk our lives and the lives of our loved ones for the sake of others, even when our immediate interests are not at stake.
Insofar as we fail to fully sympathize with the interests of others and to act accordingly, our love is imperfect, and we are not fully ethical.
According to the Hartshornean understanding of perfect love, we might interpret the scriptural command — «Be ye perfect» — to mean that we are commanded to act from a social awareness that is perfectly responsive to the interests of all others, and for the purpose of promoting the greatest liberty for all.
I watched the show, and am a American caucasin female from a very rural, but not southern area.I found the show interesting and thought provoking.Just as in our own Judio - Christian religions, women are expected to be somewhat subserviant and makes our American Islam citizens seem pretty much like any other citizens.I found this to be a good and humanizing feature.If you love U.S.A., and are a citizen you are the same as anyone else.Just encourage each other and us, too.
In contrast to a view of divine love which does not admit that God sides with the oppressed, Hartshorne holds that God favors the creaturely exercise of freedom up to the point where it becomes excessive and is a threat to the freedom of others to pursue their interests.
Thus, on Hartshorne's view, ethical status is measured by love, that is, by action from social awareness which takes account of the interests of others.
The distinction corresponds to some degree to that between soul and body Agape is disinterested and impartial, without regard to persons, while eros is interested love, concerned with this person rather than that and desirous of the body of the other.
C. S. Lewis said that those who are «in love» are normally face to face, absorbed in each other; friends, side by side are absorbed in some common interest.
I love this country, but Americans need to understand that other countries and religiouns are not at all interested in kow towing to the Christians and the Imperialists.
It is not helpful at this level to ask whether this spontaneous love of the other constitutes altruism in contrast to self - interest.
The work of Janet Smith and others in promoting this Catholic teaching and the widespread interest in the teaching of Pope John Paul on love and marriage should stir the conscience of those who promoted the «follow your conscience» line on contraception.
The function of worship is to make us more sensitive to these depths; to focus, sharpen and deepen our response to the world and to other people beyond the point of proximate concern (of liking, self - interest, limited commitment, etc.) to that of ultimate concern; to purify and correct our loves in the light of Christ's love; and in him to find the grace and power to be the reconciled and reconciling community.
If one asks, what are the possible roads to a world without war, that essential way - station on the way to freedom of information in anecologically organized world, Arthur Waskow answers that there are five: (a) Control of the nation - state system through stabilizing the balance of power and reducing international tensions but keeping the weapons; (b) Reform of the system through total disarmament without abandoning national sovereignty or the pursuit of national interest; (c) Extension of the system through the creation of a federal world government; (d) Fragmentation of the system through increases in the power of extra-national associations and Institutions across national boundaries, and corresponding decreases in state power as these occupational, industrial, scientific, and other groups gradually expropriate from the national governments the power to make decisions within their own fields; and (e) Abolition of the system through substituting love f or coercion.20.»
Are we more interested in loving others in Jesus name, or in defining and preserving our identity as the tribe?
The contrast consists in the direction of one's concern, with power focused in the self - interest of an individual or a group, and love concerned with what is for the good of the other.
On the other hand, they may represent certain dominant human interests such as love, war, and agriculture.
And according to Paul, even the greatest, most dramatic acts of charity will leave me feeling empty if I do them out of self - interest (easing my conscience) rather than out of love (easing other people's burdens).
An even weightier argument for interpreting love and justice as diverse though related orders has been stated by Reinhold Niebuhr.2 Niebuhr holds that the highest love is self - sacrificing whereas justice is always an accommodation of the interest of each in relation to the other.
And clauses calling readers to «be of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord, looking to the interests of others» are frequent.
Love, in terms that are relevant to international politics, means caring for the welfare and the dignity of all — those at a great distance, those on the other side of every boundary, those whose interests may conflict with our national interests, those who are enemies or opponents.
He's not interested in sowing love or caring for others.
In this post, I have only talked about loving others (my wife) and studying books (me), but I imagine there are other passions and interests that some of you might have.
Of course, the love through which faith works must still continue to accept others and to act in their interests within society and culture as presently constituted.
Clearly, if it is God whom we are to love with all of our powers, God must be one individual as distinct from all others whose interests we can take account of and act to realize.
In general, we may say that these implications include everything that follows for human action — both how we are to act and what we are to do — from a love for God and for all others in God that is unbounded in the two respects just noted, and so covers both the full range of creaturely interests and the full scope of human responsibility.
But to be loyal to another necessarily involves — if, indeed, it is not simply another word for — loving the other, in the sense of so accepting the other as to take account ofthe other's interests and then acting toward the other on the basis of such acceptance.
I appreciate your points especially the one about the new covenant and a few others but in my opinion in your interest to demosntrate the value of hte cross and to shy away from sin and the wrath of God you have actually cheapened and devalued the Love God has for us.
Let us defend others» right to believe, to love, to walk in what they think is right, without condemning them, and only offering them what we believe when they are interested in hearing it and sharing our views as we share bread together.
When churches pray together — not one church praying for its own interests, but churches praying for each other — and when churches truly love each other, there is an immense power and blessing that God will unload on them.
«22 and «love in which every life affirms the interest of the other
On the other hand his vivid interest seems to be essentially in life in this world of people and nature that we know and love.
I think we all need to constantly remind ourselves to look to the interests of others (and not just to those we love).
Mt. 3:10, Mt 22:13, [Rich man and Lazarus] Luke 16: 19 - 31 Other times directly to his disciples as they come to Jesus separately to understand: Mt: 13: 36 -50, Mt. 5: 22, Mt 7: 19, Jn 15:6, Mt 24:51 Very interesting that Jesus never preaches hell or about the devil to the masses, was all about Love and relationship with God and our fellow man, and for our righteousness to surpass that of the Religious of that day....
They truly love the industry they are in and have each other's best interests at heart.
In the interest of full disclosure I don't know that I would use it much myself (I'm terrible at planning meals and have finally accepted that about myself) but I love to see other people's processes and thoughts.
I loved watching other people style things because it was so interesting to see how they made choices and adjusted things throughout their process.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z