Sentences with phrase «other money problems»

They can show you how to budget, manage your debts and help you deal with other money problems.

Not exact matches

And while the report focuses on convincing Ottawa to cough up the money to pay for a host of new housing options, the nub of the problem actually lies with other levels of government.

Another problem is that, as it is so convenient, the amount of money that you can obtain is smaller than the other avenues.

Bill, he told me repeatedly, knew no other solution than throwing money and people at a problem, which was why Microsoft's software was so convoluted and mediocre.

Although its easy to hear the tiny violins playing, the article does note that serious issues can come from having a huge amount of money — more depression, anxiety, and other psychological problems can arise when a big amount of money comes into someones life:

The problem many of us face is figuring out which form of content is worth investing our time and money in that's had the most success with other brands.

Other facets of the Grylls plan include lifting the payroll tax - free threshold from $ 850,000 to $ 1.5 million, ensuring any money from privatisations is reinvested in infrastructure, and a renewed campaign aimed at fixing problems with WA's GST distribution.

The family's bank of choice has long been Deutsche Bank, which was the only bank willing to loan to Trump after he lost others money in a series of bankruptcies — something he figured «was the bank's problem, not mine,» he wrote in his 2007 book, «Think Big: Make it Happen in Business and Life.»

If one had a problem, there would be reputational repercussions for the entire system, making it harder for them to borrow money from other banks.

Valeant spent $ 101 million on research and development in the third quarter when it «could have put that on hold,» Papa said, and used that money to pay down debt instead, or save it for other problems, perhaps legal, that Valeant may face.

The team at YouCastr cited money problems as the reason for failure but went on to highlight other reasons for shutting down vs. trying to raise more money writing:

Last year, Separovic went to Stellar's San Francisco offices with a problem: all the MFIs he was working with had no way to send money quickly and easily between each other.

I am not a big fan of schadenfreude — that is, the act of getting joy from the suffering of others — but you can feel a little bit better about your own financial problems when you realize that few people are free of money stress.

Some of the world's most successful entrepreneurs are venturing into the future, while others are gunning to throw their money at more traditional problems.

The problem with his mindset is that it required working for money and for others.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

«The problem is, when you have no real purpose for your money other than chasing a lifestyle, you end up using every extra dollar you earn in the pursuit of more.»

Look, if these two groups of speculators, managed money traders on one side and speculators we call commercials on the other side wanted to wager massive bets and kept their betting to themselves, then no problem — they can have at it.

Politicians and central bankers will manage the crisis of 2016 - 2017 as they have most other crises (such as 1987, 1998, 2000, 2008) by increasing spending, addressing an excess debt problem with even more debt, and pumping more «funny money» into the global financial system.

The problem with cell phone plans, much like cable plans, gym memberships, magazine subscriptions, household lighting, or countless other money sinks that we need to optimize, is that most people grossly overpay for what they actually use.

At BitX we believe mainstream adoption of Bitcoin will initially start within these types of niches — areas where Bitcoin can solve problems that other payment methods or types of money can not — and then branch out to broader mainstream adoption.

I don; t think we are exempt from the problems all others face in society — in this you are 100 % on the money — I believe this too.

Wake up America why we are letting Peter King and people like him to waste time and money on non issues they should be working to solve the real problems facing this country JOBS LOSSES, OUT SOURCEING, BUDGET DEFICIET, BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, UN JUST FOREIGN POLICY, SOCIAL SECURITY, LABOUR UNION PROBLEMS, JOB SECURITY for those who have any jobs left, bringing our troops home from UNJUST and ILLEGAL WARS, KILLING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, OIL COMPANIES making billions of unjust Profit and paying millions to their CEO's, INFRA STRUCTURES ROADS and BRIDGES and so many other Real issues that they have been elected tproblems facing this country JOBS LOSSES, OUT SOURCEING, BUDGET DEFICIET, BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES, UN JUST FOREIGN POLICY, SOCIAL SECURITY, LABOUR UNION PROBLEMS, JOB SECURITY for those who have any jobs left, bringing our troops home from UNJUST and ILLEGAL WARS, KILLING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, OIL COMPANIES making billions of unjust Profit and paying millions to their CEO's, INFRA STRUCTURES ROADS and BRIDGES and so many other Real issues that they have been elected tPROBLEMS, JOB SECURITY for those who have any jobs left, bringing our troops home from UNJUST and ILLEGAL WARS, KILLING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, OIL COMPANIES making billions of unjust Profit and paying millions to their CEO's, INFRA STRUCTURES ROADS and BRIDGES and so many other Real issues that they have been elected to solve.

Save as precluded by law, we will not be liable to you for any indirect or consequential loss, damage or expenses (including loss of profits, business or goodwill) howsoever arising out of any problem you notify to us under this condition and we shall have no liability to pay any money to you by way of compensation other than to refund to you the amount paid by you for the goods in question as above.

Money problems seem to be the first concern of seminary students followed by the gap between church and seminary, the lack of time in seminary to learn all that is needed to know, the shortage of «practical» learning, the need for seminary to change with the times and other items are discussed by seminary students.

A lot of people in the street do not automatically have problems with alcohol or other addictions and are smart enough to spend their money wisely.

@Brad So you have no problem with destroying other people's lives as long as you get the money so that you can keep it for yourself.

Big D nobody is stopping you from getting involved and donating to your favorite charities the problem with liberals is they do not want to use there money to help the poor they want to use other peoples money.

You said: «As someone once said, The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money to spend.»

I have a problem with victims who take settlements and then disappear with the money with no care or warning to others..

While I agree that (unlimited) compound interest that it is a big problem for the economy and need to be reformed, fiat money on the other side it is one of the major tools that prevented today's recession to become a another Great Depression.

Why should a country that has a current account deficit of $ 9.5 trillion be spending money on other countries» water problems when we are so seriously neglecting our own infrastructure?

This will fester on and on till we get rid of the real problem WENGER hes the cause of our demise why does the board still support him he must have big friends on the board any other manager would have been sacked years ago but not Wenger does he run the club or what????? And Ozil the useless German hes the worst player on the field no commitment, and along with a few others he should be sold we have the money, months ago it was said we had in excess of 160 million to spend where did that go we only spent 50 m.

I can't see Wenger going soon, he is earning 7.5 million a year, he knows well no other club will pay that sort of money to a failure manager.Wenger has a problem with hearing, he can't hear the fans abuses.

If your answer is YES, then the only problem here is the owner who has not sack Wenger because he obviously love what the man (Wenger) is doing for him... making money like we did this summer making a profit on transfers when other clubs were spending lots of money upgrading their teams.

We have more problems than solutions, you all here are frustated and led by emotions, look logicly, our manager has 8m salary to do his job, while we spend our priceless time here on this forum, logic says look at table, look at players, look at salarys, our players do nt deserve that much money, cuz if you are overpaid you are expected to do thing other cant, correct?

He's not the only problem, as Silent Stan has the say on who goes or stays & hes happy enough making money (his shares have doubled in # # #) all the while we falter like every single one of his other sports teams, check it up I don't have to explain it.

If you are in favour of throwing money at problems (which we don't have), please feel free to go and support Man City, Real Madrid or Man U amongst others.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

That's as long as he's healthy, which is a big if... The other problem is that he would likely cost Arsenal a considerable amount of money, but adding him could help Arsenal improve on the SBR reviewed Ladbrokes odds to win the Premier League next year.

The problem is that other teams have more money, including perhaps Everton and Southampton given what has taken place with new owners.

We're going to waste time and money on a CB when we should be looking for a top class DM.If Wenger think signing another CB is solving our problems then he's lying to himself.Mark my words any other CB we sign no matter how good will still come and add to a shaky defense.The problem with our defenfing is more of tactical and mental.Tactical because we play without a DM, we mark and track players poorly, the fullbacks are usually isolated leaving them to cope alone, our passing is not good enough leaving us exposed to counters which we aren't prepared for and no leadership and maintenance of defensive shape.

The problem is that other teams have more money, including Everton and Southampton.

However, with both Bahrain and China showing that it is still possible for drivers to race each other, the teams are apparently not too keen to spend a load of money of changing the regulations to fix a problem that they're not sure exists.

The biggest problem has been wenger for long time now «project» run Arsenal football club as an academy and try to prove to everyone else he is the one who knows better and try to bring in kids who have potential but not ready for 1st team resisting spending money to improve squad depth and cling in on average players: Iwobi, welbeck, theo, chambers, holding and player other players on wrong position Monreal and not give opportunity to good footballer Perez and Campell also you have been holding too much power from transfer, players contracts, arsenal finances as a whole and now all that BS start to backfire

Having 3 players in other positions for example rb is a good problem to have but having 3 gk is really a waste of money.

One last thing because I appreciate your thoughtful response, but my main problem with the Paris Climate Accord is that it uses the U.S. to subsidize, and therefore redistribute money to other countries when I think the money would be better spent here at home since we are already one of the world's top 5 polluters.

The problem with that is that the english teams would fail, as other nations will always produce better players then the brits, so its good that the premier leuage has money to spend

That's my only problem, Conor's moves and him chasing all these boxing fights etc. whilst keeping the UFC belt at the same time is just costing the other fighters, he is kind of holding the division hostage to keep the belt to use it in promotions in his own fights, put simply making money at the cost of others.

The Arsenal problem is comparable to a man who needs to go for surgery, but prefers just taking pain relief medicine because the money he has in his account, he wants to use it to buy another car to add to his 3 other cars.