Sentences with phrase «other obvious answer»

Not exact matches

There's the obvious answer of following the lead of Elon Musk and others and deleting your account.

Besides the obvious answer of hefty family responsibilities in this age bracket, other research suggests that as you rise in the career ladder, competition and support fade just as stress is dialed up, leading to

Besides the obvious answer of hefty family responsibilities in this age bracket, other research suggests that as you rise in the career ladder, competition and support fade just as stress is dialed up, leading to a bump in unhappiness levels during midlife.

Which also, helpfully, answers the other obvious question raised by her «entrepreneurial thinking for everyone» mantra, which is: Why bother?

There is obvious signs on design and we all know design needs a designer, there is no other logical answer.

The obvious answer if it was to convince others then, is to take that massive build up to heaven opening up and the wrath of God right there ready to wipe them out... and wipe them all out, earth opening up, people exploding, being run through by angels... but nothing happens, they watch and Stephen dies with no help to stop them or anyone in that opened up heaven telling them to stop.

The answer to this is perhaps obvious, but it is very important: it must be sufficient for our needs and our faith and our common sense, not for the needs and faith and common sense of some other people or some other time.

The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

ng obvious answer to the original question is that some are poor, some better, some good and all other shades in between as well.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

In other words I wondered what was the specific concern, but I guess the answer is obvious.

Do you want to know what the «only white people can be racist» crowd use as a coping mechanism to explain obvious racism in other cultures (the answer would be doublethink)?

I don't think we can say the answer to this question is obvious to one side or the other.

Less open people typically generate fewer and more obvious answers to this question — building walls, building houses, building other stuff.

Clinical translation is the obvious answer, and hopefully this research will represent an important step in reducing the risk of stem cell treatment for diabetes, as well as other diseases.

The other waiter has made a very obvious assertion, but he is not answering the real question you were trying to ask, which (paraphrased) was «What outside event or activity is causing all these people to come into the restaurant now?»

Other answers were really obvious.

Well, my dears, the answers to these questions and a couple others, could not be more obvious or predictable.

One could be forgiven for asking what purpose is served by repackaging and rebranding the same film over and over, other than the obvious answer: the pursuit of wealth.

Why it happens is an interesting question for which nobody has a great answer, as far as I know, other than the obvious point that the schools and classrooms those kids enter into don't know how (or don't try very hard) to sustain earlier gains.

While you may find some of their answers to be painfully obvious, others may surprise you.

So, I think the answer becomes really obvious when we look at the other types of unsecured debts like credit cards.

** The (other) obvious answer is to MOVE ON!

But, as time went on, there were so many more questions than answers that appeared, and the conclusion felt obvious — that was to open the floor for stories, experiences about how your cats verbally respond to each other, you and the other humans in your home, and the world around them.

Eric: Based on the reaction from the vocal group of gamers around the world, the obvious answer is that Microsoft made a good move by reversing their always - on policy for the Xbox One, but with it we also saw a few other features disappear, such as family sharing.

Based on the reaction from the vocal group of gamers around the world, the obvious answer is that Microsoft made a good move by reversing their always - on policy for the Xbox One, but with it we also saw a few other features disappear, such as family sharing.

In other cases, and this is one, sometimes just looking at it gets you two thirds of the way to the answer, and that's the obvious fact that ice is substantially more reflective than ocean water even in the Arctic.

When Gort first visited in 1951, it spent little effort on climate change issues, focusing on other aspects of our planet instead: Gort returned in 2012 to answer puny human climatologist questions about whether climate change caused particular weather phenomena by making an obvious point: rather than struggle with theoretical analysis, you can simply use your Climate Changeometer to remove all the excess greenhouse gases and aerosols above natural levels and then measure the outcome.

The reason for not answering should be obvious, but still they don't answer and still we have others who are ready to accept the situation that they can not contest my explicit claims.

It makes me less likely to use this otherwise wonderful graph in explaining the issue to, for example, student, or from sharing it on other blogs, since the same criticism will likely be raised and I will be left with no answer (unless, of course, I am missing something blindingly obvious to everyone else... wouldn't be the first time» --RRB--RRB-.

But as Jones was not on the circulation of the emails he could not delete them and was happy to answer the question «Did you delete them», its the fault of the inquiries they did not follow the obvious wrong of asking others to delete emails that had just been asked for in an FOI.

But if the «correct» answer is so obvious it should be easy for others to demonstrate different results.

One obvious place to seek an answer is on the other side of the carbon pricing ledger: the revenue.

The obvious answer, based on the emails and other similar actions, is that they were putting their careers and reputations above the science, if not grant moneys.

Answer obvious, and pertains only to anvils in frigid baths (or similar concepts), but it is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand: it has NO relationship to atmospheric physics, due to «other factors,» such as convection and evaporation / condensation of water.

While the answers to some of the questions just posed seem obvious, the answer to others may be less clear.

The Court of Appeal did not however deem the answer to this question obvious, given that six courts in other EU Member States had declared national legislation to be invalid on the basis of DRI.

As for what this has to do with law, the answer is as obvious as the flag above: Artificial intelligence and other changes related to technology, including virtual law firms, cheap online contract sales, alternative firms, among more, should have already shocked the legal industry into changing their outdated business model.

One of the obvious answers is trucking companies, but there are many other businesses that should invest in this kind of insurance, including:

On the other hand, do not ask questions where the answer is obvious or readily available — or when the topic has already been thoroughly discussed in the interview.

Other than that, though, your cover letter is your answer — write a smart, thoughtful cover letter that makes your intelligence obvious.

The research on what makes a marriage happy is fairly an obvious answer: happy marriages have partners that really like each other.

Marriage Contempt Antidotes The research on what makes a marriage happy is fairly an obvious answer: happy marriages have partners that really like each other.

@Ryan LaRocca You are not going to find a perfect answer because laws are never black and white, and often other less obvious parts of the law apply that you don't realize.

Apart from the obvious answer of spending less than you earn and saving up the required deposit, there are other ways of obtaining the funds required to purchase your first investment property.