Not exact matches
In regards to OX who i think has become arsenal's most important asset,
injuries must be properly dealt with and given a proper amount of time to heal, its
obvious the effect of Sanchez on OX development, when his finishing becomes more lethal i feel he will be mention as in the same awe of which we speak about Hazard and
others.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was
obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when
injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the
injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the
other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
At the end of it the debate will boil down to DO WE HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN THE EPL OR THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE??? first let's start with what went wrong the
other season nothing we finished 12 pts behind the league leaders chelsea and 5 pts behind city... mmmh
injuries (no longer news and infact we're already in it), lack of a proper dm till the new year (le coq emergence who desperately needed a back up), lack of a lethal striker (giroud's 3mnth
injury noted though obviously not good enough and the sole reason wenger himself was reportedly looking for an «exceptional striker») and finally the
obvious lack of depth in key positions (DM, CBs and yes a CF).
While some of your child's aches and pains have a clear and
obvious cause, because children are often active and
injury prone,
others may not be as easy to discern.
But
other archaeologists argue that the bones — with no
obvious signs of
injury or strenuous physical activity — are too pristine to have seen battle.
«Adverse mental health outcomes may not be as apparent as are physical
injuries such as broken bones, bleeding, and
other obvious trauma.
For starters, there are plenty of
obvious advantages to driving safely: avoidance of accidents means steering clear of damage to your vehicle, physical
injury to yourself or
others, missed work, etc..
But the bankruptcy estate includes
other less
obvious interests: HSA / FSA accounts, prepaid flights, season tickets to a sporting event, and, you guessed it, a personal
injury claim.
The
other cat, found in the same area cat was 12 years old and had some health problems; however, she had no
obvious signs of
injury when our gardener found her.
Some
injuries are
obvious, such as a cat with an open wound, while
others have more subtle signs that can be equally deadly if left untreated.
Some
injuries are
obvious, such as a cat with an open wound, while
others have more subtle signs that can be equally dangerous if left untreated.
Not all
injuries are
obvious and a cat in pain may become hostile towards you,
other family members or your
other pets.
Some of these will be
obvious and current expenses, while
others might be subtle changes to your quality of life or represent future needs created by your motorcycle crash
injuries.
In
other instances where the
injuries are not so
obvious, for example traumatic brain
injuries (TBI), a doctor may need to evaluate the victim and provide his or her opinion regarding the permanent and long - term nature of the harm sustained by the accident victim.
MacIsaac & Company's lawyers have access to excellent medical and rehabilitation specialists who can identify the nature and severity of spinal cord
injuries, including less
obvious spinal cord
injuries, and provide a prognosis and
other recommendations upon which compensation for future losses is based.
In
other instances, while signs may be
obvious, nursing homes may deny allegations of abuse or even say your loved one caused his or her own
injuries.
However, just like with
other personal
injury claims, there are issues that must be evaluated when determining if a child victim premises liability exists, including issues related to owners and occupants, foreseeability, attractive nuisances, and open and
obvious dangers — all of which are discussed below.
Other costs that may be necessary after you suffer a catastrophic
injury may be less
obvious.
No matter how
obvious it may be to you that the
other driver was at fault, understand that if you have a personal
injury claim as a result of a car crash, the insurance company will do everything in its power to limit their liability and pay you as little as possible — if anything at all.
In
other cases, it is not
obvious, because the
injury happened gradually or even if suddenly, no one was there to witness it.
Some falls result in
obvious injuries like a broken hip, but
other injuries are not as
obvious.
It is possible to negotiate your own insurance settlement, especially when the
injuries are relatively minor and the
other party's fault is
obvious.
When you consider things like whiplash and
other common
injuries from accidents that don't do
obvious damage such a broken bone, but are painful problems that can take years to heal, medical payments coverage on your auto policy is a great benefit.