Sentences with phrase «other obvious question»

The other obvious question relating to tree rings is that any gardener knows that plants grow best (add the thickest tree rings) when conditions are optimal for growth.

The other obvious question about the hugeness of the job has to do with personal cost, especially at a time when the industry has been sensitised to the massive demands being made on its figurehead individuals.

Which also, helpfully, answers the other obvious question raised by her «entrepreneurial thinking for everyone» mantra, which is: Why bother?

Not exact matches

«The map raises an obvious question: what about the other half?»

I asked the obvious question, of whether this feature will be rolled out to other countries, and while I didn't get a reply in the affirmative, that certainly would be the plan.

One obvious question to ask is whether other monetary frameworks would have fared any better.

Because they draw their affirmation from others, they'll never stop to question it, even when the hurtful consequences of their actions become obvious.»

That said, it shouldn't come as a surprise if many others would have the same questions as they're fairly obvious questions.

Nobody thought much of religions other than Christianity; as was obvious by our public school pledge — which admonished us all to be good Christian citizens... Sure, I had questions too, but our church was pretty low - key so I was safe from some of the more radically - minded (read: brainwashed) of my peers.

Beyond the obvious question of how well the school actually can assess relevant background knowledge and experience is the fact that the system does not take into account other worthy commitments in a student's life, like work or ministry responsibilities outside the school.

Aside from the obvious questions on abortion, I was curious about whether members of these two organizations would differ substantially on other matters related to life and death.

The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts.

They will let others wonder about the obvious questions.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

ng obvious answer to the original question is that some are poor, some better, some good and all other shades in between as well.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

A personal vendetta against the GOP chairman for asking him a question that 1) is completely relevant and obvious, and 2) was asked of him by every other political reporter in the state?

Nor is there an obvious consensus «progressive» position to promote, beyond the one these groups were all touting in the last few weeks (along with many others, including some conservative organizations), which was the need to bring the question before Congress.

These are only a few of the obvious questions and others lurk to be revealed on deeper consideration.

I don't think we can say the answer to this question is obvious to one side or the other.

The obvious question is whether these results may actually act as a deterrent for other scientists.

If the genetic mutation that gives people with Laron syndrome their short stature also protects them against two of the most pernicious diseases of aging, diabetes and cancer, then it prompts two obvious questions: What other diseases might the mutation protect against, and do people who carry the mutation in fact live longer than their unaffected peers?

The obvious question is whether the plants are really talking, or if they're just eavesdropping on what is happening with the others.

Less open people typically generate fewer and more obvious answers to this question — building walls, building houses, building other stuff.

That might sound obvious, but proving the relationship is important because it paves the way for future surveys that can explore who is killing carnivores by simply asking people innocuous questions about their attitudes and their views on the behaviour of others.

The other waiter has made a very obvious assertion, but he is not answering the real question you were trying to ask, which (paraphrased) was «What outside event or activity is causing all these people to come into the restaurant now?»

I have one question that was not reviewed in youtube video though (maybe it is obvious to others, but sorry still a novice), after using wax do you put a varnish on top as a finish?

Aside from the obvious question of why Tania Georgelas is not in jail for assisting an organization that creates actual sex slaves and brutally murders thousands, this newest instance of a thirsty male with a low quality, maladjusted female (plus all the other suitors who eagerly vied for her) should make us all shudder.

Well, my dears, the answers to these questions and a couple others, could not be more obvious or predictable.

The obvious inability of simplistic historical approaches to establish «experimental isolation» - to rule out other factors that might have influenced the observed outcomes - opens up results from such analyses to significant interpretative questions.

Why it happens is an interesting question for which nobody has a great answer, as far as I know, other than the obvious point that the schools and classrooms those kids enter into don't know how (or don't try very hard) to sustain earlier gains.

«She shares her great questions with her classmates and teachers, helping others to delve to understand important concepts and principles behind the superficially obvious.»

Your questions, prompts and comments should cause the children to think beyond the obvious and to consider the ideas and information they find in the text, along with what they already know or what they know others hold to be true.

So, the question begs, other than the obvious, which is to make more money off of gullible authors, what is the reasoning behind producing this information - that - isn't - quite - disinformation - but - not - really - accurate reports?

Dougie Brimson New Generation Publishing The other day, whilst talking about the subject of publishing, I was referred to as an indie - author and then asked if I was comfortable with the label... I have actually given it some consideration and eventually I goggled the obvious question; what is an indie author?

The obvious question, then, is should authors go with KDP Select (an exclusive arrangement) or use a service such as Smashwords and its other outlets?

, and a couple other obvious yes / no type questions.

If we accept Graham's thesis that a value investing strategy will consistently deliver a premium over a market portfolio, which is a cap - weighted portfolio, and empirical research has documented the existence of a value premium over the last 86 years, albeit with the exception of the last decade, 2 the obvious question is: Who are the investors willing to take the other side of the trade?

HomeTeam Inspection Service was my choice because of its family owned operation and dedication shown from ownership, the amazing success of other franchise owners, the availability and ability to support my every question, and the obvious drive to ensure franchisees are successful,» says Charley.

But it also brings an obvious question to mind: How is it that Denver can take so many dogs from other communities and seemingly effortlessly find them all homes?

Other common questions include, «What if my dog or cat is having an obvious allergic reaction to something?

But, as time went on, there were so many more questions than answers that appeared, and the conclusion felt obvious — that was to open the floor for stories, experiences about how your cats verbally respond to each other, you and the other humans in your home, and the world around them.

Other than the obvious beer tastings at each stop, we were also lectured on the ins and outs of the brewing process, as well as given the opportunity to meet and ask questions from representatives of some of the brewers at each stop.

What if my itinerary was flagged, making it obvious that other agents should question it, too.

The obvious open questions relate to the importance of other forcings, in particular, greenhouse gases (which were not changed in this experiment), and the robustness of any transient response (i.e. does a simulated drought occur in the Sahel in the 1980s more often than at any other time).

In fact, this overweening clamor for raw data seems to miss the obvious point that if Mann or Briffa or the legions of others working in this arena are so wrong in their conclusions, it should be an easy task to disprove their claims using various experiments entirely independent of the data in question.

(This ability to capture early 20th century warming due to internal variability remains rare in models, with this result a bit of an outlier — whether this is due to underestimation of variability by models or the presence of other forcings remains the obvious question.)

When Gort first visited in 1951, it spent little effort on climate change issues, focusing on other aspects of our planet instead: Gort returned in 2012 to answer puny human climatologist questions about whether climate change caused particular weather phenomena by making an obvious point: rather than struggle with theoretical analysis, you can simply use your Climate Changeometer to remove all the excess greenhouse gases and aerosols above natural levels and then measure the outcome.

No, my first question is an obvious reference to the behaviors of you and other Warmers.

I have already embarrassed myself once here by not seeing what is obvious to others, but I have another question.