This is similar to the more familiar liability coverage for auto insurance since it also pays property and physical damages of
the other party in case of accidents.
If you are a motorist in South Carolina, you are required to have two types of insurance coverages: liability insurance to cover damages and losses suffered by
the other party in case of a road mishap in the limits of 25/50/25, and Uninsured Motorist Insurance to cover damages and losses you yourself suffered when an uninsured driver causes an accidents, also in the limits of 25/50/25.
The other party in a case has filed a motion for summary judgement against you.
Notwithstanding the requirements of clause (b) of this subparagraph, members of the professional development team employed in or representing a school under registration review, pursuant to subdivision (p) of this section, including but not limited to teachers, administrators, curriculum specialists and parents, shall not be designated for appointment as prescribed in clause (b) of this subparagraph but shall instead be recommended by the chancellor for appointment by the board of education of the community school district in the case of community school districts, and appointed by the chancellor without being designated by
any other party in the case of high school divisions, special education divisions and the chancellor's district.
The other parties in this case are the three children of the matriarch of the Abrasax family.
Underinsured motorist coverage protects you as a covered policy holder from having to personally take care of the costs ordinarily paid by
the other party in cases when you get into an accident and the negligent driver has no insurance.
Children's Guardians are independent of
all other parties in the case.
An agreed or uncontested modification case is uncontested when you and
the other parties in your case agree (no one is contesting) to change terms in a previous order about custody, visitation, or child support.
Not exact matches
In the other 8 cases, the incumbent party lost, including at least 3 of the biggest political turning points in US history (1860, 1932, 1980
In the
other 8
cases, the incumbent
party lost, including at least 3 of the biggest political turning points
in US history (1860, 1932, 1980
in US history (1860, 1932, 1980).
«We've considered this
case closed for a long time, and we're pleased to see the
other party now agrees,» Facebook said
in a statement.
The idea is that when participants compete, third
parties (voters
in one
case, and consumers
in the
other) reap the benefits.
«Third -
party bundles (games developed by another developer) are more expensive, but
in many
cases [are] associated with one console over the
other... Even third
party bundles cost only around $ 40, and the perceived benefit is $ 50 or more... Thus, bundles always make more sense.»
But
in Simmons»
case, his writing is a loss leader for
other things that he is making money from, rather than going through a third
party the way newspapers and
other media outlets do.
«For more than four years, the government of Ecuador has offered to cooperate
in facilitating the questioning of Julian Assange
in the Ecuadorian embassy
in London, as well as proposing
other political and legal measures,
in order to reach a satisfactory solution for all
parties involved
in the legal
case against Julian Assange, to end the unnecessary delays
in the process and to ensure full and effective legal protection, Ecuador said
in a statement, Press Association reported.
But the revelation this week that Mr. Thiel was covertly backing Mr. Bollea's
case as well as
others has raised a series of new questions about the First Amendment as well as about the role of big money
in the court system — specifically the emerging field of litigation finance,
in which third
parties like hedge funds and investment firms pay for
other people's lawsuits.
Outside the hall were millions of Canadians who,
in many
cases, support
other parties precisely because of Harper's position on taxes, daycare, gun control and a hundred
other issues.
The plaintiffs» motion states that
in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets of plaintiffs stated that they supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the
parties» agreement that these three
cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral arguments, and independently make
other litigation decisions.»
Their platform was largely «financed» by the surpluses projected
in the November 2014 Update and the April 2015 Budget, rather than having to come up with new Sources of Funds, as is the
case for the
other two
parties..
Our use of derivatives may increase the risks of investing
in the fund by increasing investment exposure (which may be considered leverage) or,
in the
case of many over-the-counter instruments, because of the potential inability to terminate or sell derivatives positions and failure of the
other party to the instrument to meet its obligations.
in the
case of our directors, officers, and security holders, (i) the receipt by the locked - up
party from us of shares of Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon (A) the exercise or settlement of stock options or RSUs granted under a stock incentive plan or
other equity award plan described
in this prospectus or (B) the exercise of warrants outstanding and which are described
in this prospectus, or (ii) the transfer of shares of Class A common stock, Class B common stock, or any securities convertible into Class A common stock or Class B common stock upon a vesting or settlement event of our securities or upon the exercise of options or warrants to purchase our securities on a «cashless» or «net exercise» basis to the extent permitted by the instruments representing such options or warrants (and any transfer to us necessary to generate such amount of cash needed for the payment of taxes, including estimated taxes, due as a result of such vesting or exercise whether by means of a «net settlement» or otherwise) so long as such «cashless exercise» or «net exercise» is effected solely by the surrender of outstanding stock options or warrants (or the Class A common stock or Class B common stock issuable upon the exercise thereof) to us and our cancellation of all or a portion thereof to pay the exercise price or withholding tax and remittance obligations, provided that
in the
case of (i), the shares received upon such exercise or settlement are subject to the restrictions set forth above, and provided further that
in the
case of (ii), any filings under Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act, or any
other public filing or disclosure of such transfer by or on behalf of the locked - up
party, shall clearly indicate
in the footnotes thereto that such transfer of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described
in this bullet point;
Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial liability for damages to third
parties in the
case of a nuclear accidentThird, many Canadian and
other foreign companies have been unwilling to supply nuclear technology and services to India because Indian laws leave suppliers open to financial liability for damages to third
parties in the
case of a nuclear accident.
As the terms and features of ICOs may differ
in each
case,
parties engaging
in ICO activities are reminded to seek legal or
other professional advice if they are
in doubt about the applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
As such, the PC
Party will have to work closely with the other parties in the design of legislation; in some cases, the governing party may take on the priorities of these other par
Party will have to work closely with the
other parties in the design of legislation;
in some
cases, the governing
party may take on the priorities of these other par
party may take on the priorities of these
other parties.
As for your practical question - how to navigate the mess - I think of Solomon's divide - the - baby option, except that
in this
case, it's more like a divorce with lots of kids involved, and sometimes the warring
parties are happy to take a few of the kids they like and let their «ex» take the
others.
Yet here is the profound difficulty:
In every
other case I can think of involving two individuals whose rights conflict, none is resolved by legalizing the death of one
party.
Instead of behaving
in a professional manner, our military invaded Iraq with far too small a force; failed to respond adequately when parts of the Iraqi Army (and Baathist
Party) went underground; tolerated an orgy of looting and lawlessness throughout the country; disobeyed orders and ignored international obligations (including the obligation of an occupying power to protect the facilities and treasures of the occupied country — especially,
in this
case, Baghdad's National Museum and
other archaeological sites of untold historic value); and incompetently fanned the flames of an insurgency against our occupation, committing numerous atrocities against unarmed Iraqi civilians.
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which intervened
in the
case on behalf of the Knights of Columbus and
other parties, has a press release about the
case here.
@TinKnight, I hate when agnostics don't pick a side because they want to ride
in both cars
in case the
other group leaves the
party.
Numerous
other examples abound of the Committee pressuring state
parties, and
in some
cases they have clear negative impacts on the countries to which they're directed.
I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding
in any
case upon the
parties to a suit as to the object of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration
in all parallel
cases by
other departments of the government.
During the Twitter
Party, we will all use the same key word (hashtag)--
in this
case #MMBStacks (you can see this
in the left column)- and then we are all able to keep track and read each
other tweets.
One
other feature of Canadian law that tends to discourage
parties from suing physicians for malpractice is that the Supreme Court has set out guidelines that effectively cap awards for pain and suffering
in all but exceptional
cases.
In case you missed my
other posts, here they are to tell you a bit more about this new initiative: Introducing Verizon FiOS ® Custom TV &
Party Time with Verizon FiOS ®;, but the basics are this.
But
in many
cases one
party — usually the one who is feeling most vindictive or who has tried to turn the children against the
other parent — makes completely false and unsubstantiated claims of abuse as a way to «game the system.»
In case you didn't know, 5minutesformom is hosting a blog
party so everyone can «mingle» at each
other's blogs.
The involvement of a ruling
party mla
in the
other case in the state of Uttar Pradesh has further infuriated the public.
(Very little, it would seem, apart from not succeeding,
in the
case of the tiny minority, 1.3 % of the electorate
in 2005, it will be very much lower now, who belong to one or
other of the main political
parties.)
Like
other British political
parties, the Conservative and Unionist
Party publish (and update) party rules, in their case branded as a Constitu
Party publish (and update)
party rules, in their case branded as a Constitu
party rules,
in their
case branded as a Constitution.
The point that I am going to disagree with the idea that attitudes towards anti-Semitism have changed does not mean that there can not be
cases of genuine anti-Semites
in the Labour
party (or
in any
other group of people big enough).
Doubtlessly, there are also lots of accusations, allegations and rumour against certain persons
in the
party which
cases appears not excite the interest of the powers that be to attract the same measure of action as earlier meted out to
others - KENNEDY AGYEPONG AND HIS ILKS.
In the worst case, they could be totally partisan and routinely declare that the party or faction they favor is right and the other party is wrong and have all their political opponents thrown in jail, without even bothering to look at the actual evidenc
In the worst
case, they could be totally partisan and routinely declare that the
party or faction they favor is right and the
other party is wrong and have all their political opponents thrown
in jail, without even bothering to look at the actual evidenc
in jail, without even bothering to look at the actual evidence.
In the wake of the Scottish referendum, as all
parties face up to the reality that the devolutionary genie is well and truly out of the bottle, and with a powerful economic
case being made by the City Growth Commission and
others, the «DevoManc» deal is an idea whose time has come.
The Learned Hand rule on such questions of tort would suggest, for example, that producers and
other parties ought to take precautions against harming
others in any
cases where the cost of the precaution is less than the expected cost of the damage: that is, the cost of the damage, discounted by the probability of its occurring.
... [T] aking it
in this civil light, the law treats it as it does all
other contracts; allowing it to be good and valid
in all
cases, where the
parties at the time of making it were,
in the first place, willing to contract; secondly, able to contract; and, lastly, actually did contract,
in the proper forms and solemnities required by law.
Gillibrand spent considerable time wooing the labor - backed
party along with
other so - called «progressive» interests (the LGBT community, black and Latino stakeholders etc.) Her initial selection by Gov. David Paterson to fill the seat vacated by former Sen. Hillary Clinton was met with considerable skepticism — and,
in some
cases, flat - out hostility — from a number of key liberal figures, who subsequently either considered challenging her
in a primary themselves or encouraged
others to do so.
But
other common practices
in southern Europe, like turning public office into a livelihood by living off public resources indefinitely, appointing incompetent people to public positions, or shamelessly benefiting from the undemocratic functioning of political
parties, are
cases of serious corruption too.
Maybe
in that
case the candidate who comes second would have the choice of deducting their final tally from the winning candidates votes
in parliament or distributing their final tally to strengthen
other representatives, e.g. of their own
party from
other seats.
In every
other case the deposit must be returned to the secretary of the
party on whose behalf the deposit is paid, but only after the Electoral Commission has received --
The Speaker of the House of Commons seeking re-election is treated effectively as if he were standing for a
party, except that
in this
case other candidates may be nominated by any
party or as independents as the proceedings begin afresh.
The first is that the Conservatives don't even end up as the largest
party and Cameron is summarily ejected from Downing Street,
in which
case he would immediately resign, leaving the way clear for Boris to fight a leadership contest against,
in all probability, George Osborne and Theresa May and possibly one or two
other, darker horses — odds on Chris Grayling anyone?