Sentences with phrase «other patent owners»

Not exact matches

Patent trolls usually acquire rights to unused or soon - to - expire patents with no motive of using the patent, other than to frighten business owners into settling out of court, rather than fighting a hopeless patentPatent trolls usually acquire rights to unused or soon - to - expire patents with no motive of using the patent, other than to frighten business owners into settling out of court, rather than fighting a hopeless patentpatent, other than to frighten business owners into settling out of court, rather than fighting a hopeless patentpatent case.
Most business owners sued by patent trolls don't talk about it to anyone other than their lawyer; a typical response is to cross one's fingers and hope the problem goes away.
However, the farmers believe the force behind this push is Golden Rice patent owner Syngenta and other giant biotech corporations including Monsanto.
Any name, logo, trademark, service mark, patent, design, copyright or other intellectual property appearing on this Site is owned or licensed by BEAM SUNTORY or its parents, affiliates or subsidiaries and may not be used by you without the prior written consent of BEAM SUNTORY or the appropriate owner.
Trademarks, patents and other intellectual property are fiercely guarded by their owners, who will usually sue to either get a cut of any profit by way of licence or to prevent its use all together,» says Donald Ramsbottom, a solicitor in Portsmouth who specialises in Internet law.
The Hasting Center's Johnston suggests that Myriad and other owners of gene patents haven't really changed the gene — that it is still essentially a product of nature: «I'm sympathetic to people who say that it's like taking gold out of the ground,» Johnston says.
You further agree that all materials and / or content, including, but not limited to, articles, artwork, screen shots, graphics, logos, text, drawings and other files on the SLC Website or as part of the Service are copyrights, trademarks, service marks, patents or other proprietary rights of SLC or their respective intellectual property owners.
Except as otherwise indicated, this website, and all text, images, trademarks, trade names, logos and other content contained herein, including, without limitation, the TravelGround.com logo and all designs, text, graphics, pictures, downloads, information, data, software, sound, video and other files, domain names, web pages, patents, source code, meta tags, databases, hyperlinks, content and the selection and arrangement thereof are the proprietary property of TravelGround.com or its licensors or users and are protected from infringement by South African and international copyright laws and treaties and may not be reproduced or appropriated in any manner without the prior written permission of TravelGround.com (or the other respective owners, if applicable).
Not only is the shower great news for home owners, but its patented purification system has shown great potential for use in other fields.
Patents are an exclusionary right; the owner has the right to exclude others from practicing the claimed invention (see Section 42 of the Patent Act) as an incentive for innovation and new technology.
This procedural posture may result in AIA trials even if the patent owner submits testimony and other evidence to rebut the factual basis of a petition.
The U.S. patent system allows patent owners to exclude others from practicing an invention in exchange for disclosure of the invention to the public.
Other owners allowed their patents to lapse without the land - use requirements having been met, leaving titles open to challenge and even grant to another claimant.
Of course, the U.S. patent owner could also have his cause taken up by U.S. diplomats who could press his cause, either unilaterally in trade or other negotiations, or before General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade or World Trade Organization arbitration panels who could hear the case and decree a remedy that might or might not benefit the individual patent owner.
allow patent owners to submit expert declarations or other new testimonial evidence, with their preliminary response to a petition seeking institution of an AIA review;
In Case C - 170 / 13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp & ZTE Deutschland GmbH, (Judgment of the 5th Chamber, CJEU, 16 July 2015) the CJEU was asked to rule for the first time on whether seeking an injunction and other associated remedies by the owner of a Standard Essential Patent (SEP) against a company in breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 Patent (SEP) against a company in breach of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an abuse of a dominant position in breach of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEU).
You are the owner of a property interest (copyright, patent, other property interest) and you would like to grant the right to use of such property interest to another party for a limited period of time.
In other jurisdictions, a quick order enjoining a defendant from selling its product or offering its services can be a significant risk, leading to a higher willingness to pay the patent owner for a license.
Nothing in this section shall prevent, lessen, or impeach any other remedy which an owner of an infringed patent has under the provisions of this title, but he shall not twice recover the profit made from the infringement.
Similar to other post-grant proceedings, a party who is not the patent owner and has not previously filed a civil action seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity, may petition for Post-Grant Review of one or more claims.
Counseling patent holders and owners of other intellectual property on antitrust risks associated with various types of licensing transactions.
But the other extreme would mean that a device maker could be liable for several times or even many times the profits (because each of multiple asserted design patents would on its own entitle its owner to a disgorgement of total profits), which underscores how little sense the absence of any apportionment makes in this world, no matter how reasonable it may have appeared to Congress in the late 19th century when design patents related to no - tech products like carpets.
Inter partes reviews allow a person, other than the patent owner, to file a petition asking the USPTO to review the patent's validity.
Our life sciences practice also has considerable experience in IPRs and other post-grant proceedings acting primarily on behalf of patent owners, and has handled concurrent post-grant reviews and litigations.
That feature -LSB-...] may appear only during a particular use of the product, on one screen display among hundreds, but the panel's decision could allow the owner of the design patent to receive all profits generated by the product or platform, even if the infringing element was largely insignificant to the user and it was the thousands of other features -LSB-...] that drove the demand generating those profits.»
The patent owners also agreed to grant licences to other non-profits.
The supplier is faced with claims from the patent owner on the one side and from his customer on the other side.
High switching costs may create market power for the owners of patents that cover the standard due to the inability of firms using the standard to easily substitute other technologies to avoid high royalties.
For example, hedge funds, research and bio-medical firms, companies with special contracts and other businesses with patents and proprietary systems, all rely heavily on the niche expertise of a key employee or business owner.
No User shall transmit User Content or otherwise conduct or participate in any activities on the Web Site which, in the opinion of DriveSafeToday.com, Inc.'s counsel, are prohibited by law in applicable jurisdictions, including, without limitation, material or activities which (1) infringe any patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret or other proprietary right of any party (the «Rights»), unless User is the owner of the rights or has the express written permission of the owner to post or transmit such material to the Web Site; (2) infringe on any other intellectual property rights of others or on the privacy or publicity rights of others; (3) is obscene, defamatory, threatening, harassing, abusive, hateful, embarrassing or otherwise objectionable to another User or any other person or entity; (4) is sexually - explicit; (5) is an advertisement or solicitation of business or advocates an unsolicited or unrelated position or opinion; (6) represents any form of «chain letters» or pyramid scheme; (7) impersonates another person or entity; (8) intentionally or unintentionally violates any applicable local, state, national or international law while using or accessing the Web Site or the Materials; or (9) contains a virus, trojan, back door, logic bomb or any other form of malicious code.
As IAM explains, Apple and the other Rockstar owners have apparently decided to defang Rockstar once and for all, instead of selling it to people who would operate it as a patent troll (also known as an NPE):
Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways and set America on a course for sustainable prosperity, not large corporation lobbied poverty, should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners - large and small.
Other plaintiffs, like patent owners, don't even have to name an allegedly infringing product (let alone provide specific allegations about how the product infringes one of the patent claims).
Those wishing to help fight big business giveaways should contact us as below and join the fight as we are building a network of inventors and other stakeholders to lobby Congress to restore property rights for all patent owners - large and small.
On the other side are those like Dan Abelow, a self - styled inventor and owner of business method patents who is affiliated with prominent trolls like Lodsys.
For patented medications (brand name drugs), countries may have certain mandatory licensing programs which compel, in certain situations, a medication's owner to contract with other agents to manufacture the drug.
(c) Deny to any person or corporation the right to obtain patent, copyright or other legal protection for any element of an indigenous peoples» heritage without adequate docu - mentation of the free and informed consent of the traditional owners to an arrangement for the sharing of ownership, control, use and benefits;
«Congress needs to act to protect REALTORS ® and other main street business owners from costly, frivolous patent litigation that ultimately stifles innovation and makes it harder to meet clients» needs.»
Without meaningful patent litigation reform, Realtors ® and other small and midsize business owners will remain targets of extortion.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z