Sentences with phrase «other playing positions»

Central defenders stand out from the other playing positions.

Toliso and countless others play the position and ask yourself is AR even on the same futboling planet.

Not exact matches

For me, «playing in my lane» means using my position as PwC's chairman and senior partner to drive conversations about race and diversity, to drive change and ask the hard questions within PwC and the profession in which we compete, and to have the discussion with other CEOs and corporate leaders.

There are hundreds of other «tournaments» they can play in because there are thousands of open positions.

One other news item of note from Marathon Oil this quarter was that the company announced it leased 250,000 acres of land in new resource plays over the past year, including a large position in the emerging Louisiana Austin Chalk play.

The governor's proposal to exempt sales tax on jet fuel will level the playing field with other states, position Hartsfield - Jackson Atlanta International Airport for continued growth and benefit companies throughout the state whose businesses depend on global air service, all of which will keep Georgia competitive for the years ahead.»

To understand how BioLogos relates to other positions «in play» in our cultural conversation on origins, we have created the following categorical scheme into which most participants can be readily placed.

Plantinga does not play defense because he believes that his brand of theism holds some privileged position or because he is not interested in learning from others or because he is not involved in a common quest for truth with his critics.

Although he recognizes strands of the other approaches present in each theological position, he argues that a particular interpretation emerges in most situations as the most prominent, 22 and he enjoins Christians to reach their own «final» choice.23 The study of the struggle of congregations to grasp the relationship of Christ to their own culture suggests, however, that all four motifs are constantly in play: it is difficult to find one theme dominating the others.

Actually if we had got Lemar or even Mahrez or Draxler, they could have played Ozil's position also among other positions

+ wenger out is more than just lack of spending; its not studying the opposition, not rotating players, not addressing why we have so much more injuries than others, not subbing early enough to give incoming players a chance to influence the game, not playing players in their best positions. . . .

I think that he will go, Wenger will not buy a replacement because he discovered the secret to play players in other positions this year.

seems to reflect the general mess that the club is now in... rent seeking owner disinterested in the game, delusional manager who continues to believe the game is played in his own head rather than against other teams who are strengthening, too many players in some positions too few in others, inflated wage bill due to hanging on to deadwood players, injury prone before season starts, lack of footballing identity... wexit a necessary but probably not sufficient condition for club to regain its status

We have loads of players with individual qualities that either don't gel with others or play in positions that don't play their play style.

And due to wenger insistence of playing and stating them ahead of other better player (like cazarola, roisky, in midfield and campbell, podolski on wings), and maaking other players play out of position (Ozil on wings) to accommodate «British core», the result is everyone to see.....

Other than poor fitness, lack of desire, laziness and unhappiness of not playing in the correct position, Ozil is awesome

AW has a way of making players perform better than they are namely alex song, nasri, adebayor, overmars etc. and he has a way of making players better by playing them in other positions namely monreal, ramsey (before the 13/14 season), özil etc. and i just hate this talk of «he was played in an unfamiliar position..

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

Cavani on other hand has a great record when playing in the right position but even that won't guarantee an instant hit in the EPL.

Even if he had started as a CB, playing at the heart of a defence is something that many players take years to master, that's why CB see their best years much later on relative to any other position bar GK.

last season Wenger broke the bank to bring Ozil who is a world class but we have good players playing in the same position of Ozil... and we needed world class in other positions (ST, DM)..

If he does nt play in his favorite position he does nt try and thats not fair to the other plays like Alexis who are putting in 100 % of their effort.

Ox on the other hand doesn't want to play the wing - back position so it's a no brainer.

He gets, or rather tries to get, a kick out of trying to prove other people wrong by playing people out of position, as if it's some sort of wonder tactic.

Players should know their position and be able to play with other players in the team that play adjacent to their positions to gain a familiarity with one another and to work on tactics.

With our mid he will score 30 easily, plus consider his assists others will benefit from it heavily, Alexis — Benz — Walcott, i like it cuz they can interchange their positions, one moment its Benz next is Alexis, while having someone like OG you are forced to play him in CF role whole game.

Like other clubs Arsenal must be pumped with statistics on how players are performing, in which positions they perform best etc etc, yet Wenger seems to ignore all of this and deploy players who haven't been performing, or play them in the wrong positions.

(3) formation flexibility — it took 20 years for Wenger to return to a back 3 and now he can't seem to choose anything but that formation... the teams in the premiership and those we could face in the Europa will present vastly different tactics and we need to have a manager who can prepare this squad for this eventuality and have the fortitude to make the necessary adjustments throughout the season... I have seen nothing in the past 6 - 7 years to suggest that he is the man to take on this challenge... I can't even remember when he changed formations when he would replace a small, pacy striker, like during the Walcott experiment, with the lumbering Giroud... of course this is exactly why there is no other manager in the world that plays more players out of their natural positions (square peg in a round hole)

He played 2 direct pacy wingers on the wing, a traditional CF, and all the other players in there preferred position.

but a t some point he lost it, and is not because of his stinginess to buy players, our core is good and has been for sometime now, his biggest problem was adaptation, change to the new EPL, his philosophy dating back 20 years does not work anymore and he knows it, because of this his biggest flaw all others came out to light, lack of rotation of his players favoring some over others, stubbornness that applies to his transfer policy buying for the future just as he had 20 more years ahead, players playing out of their natural positions, ARSENAL FLOPS who knows under other Managers they could have been great, for some reason they were signed in the first place, they must had some talent, best example is Campbell....

Holding should never be in that position to begin with, although he played admirably last season again he is young and should be slowly transitioning to first team while learning from other top senior players in his position.

He plays in a position we need, is cheap, homegrown and has a potentially great upside, but on the other hand his footballing IQ is not that high so chances that we'll see that upside are debatable and he just came off injury whereas we need someone who can immediately fill in for depth.

He wasn't suppose to be the one making our defense work in the first place and he plays every other game on a different position.

But the other two have no excuses, Ramsey needs to sort out his playing position and that's CM.

That would send the wrong message to the other players, especially the first team ones (yes Wilshere is one of our bench players... He could not be a starter even to save his life... The ones playing at the same position are just clear quality above) and even to the ones who are rarely used...!!

This means that the other natural play - makers and central midfielders have been played out of their preferred position.

Instead of moving players out of position to accommodate a new arrival how about applying some tactical nous and allowing two talented players to both play as strikers.The best teams of 1998 - 2004 had a number of different strikers playing off the genius of Dennis Bergkamp.We had pace, movement and power.Although I would not put Ozil in Bergkamps class he is talented enough to pull the strings with other playmakers such as Jack and Mikki in the side in a 442.

Of course, losing wingers Robben and Ribery will have forced his hand slightly here, but it still shows a lack of a Plan B that Pep couldn't bring out a similar threat from other players like Gotze and Muller, who can both play wide, or indeed use Lahm in his preferred position of right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wrong.

All the other players that could play in that position were crap and Ozil himself was not that good either.

You cant escape he fact that Podolski was played rarely and when he was he was played out of position much the same way that Wenger has assembled a squad of players most of which are a talented bunch, but, Wenger has failed to build a team who fit n with each other, we have a midfield that overtly populated with players who al excel in the same role BUT have no solid defensive midfield talent and no options in defence when players have crap periods or are long term injury problems.

More than any other player at any position — even Gurley — Fournette is a must - play.

However we should still look to sign another player capable of playing that position, ideally Aurier but other options include: Rick Karsdorp, Mario Gaspar, Ricardo Pereira, Joao Cancelo, Elsad Hysaj, Benjamin Hendricks and Mitchell Weiser.

He seems to be able to read the game, because he has played in several other positions beforehand.

Versatile Cazzie Russell can play any position, and many of the «bench warmers» at Michigan would be starters at other schools in the country.

The fact that he has NEVER beaten Mourinho — The fact that his teams capitulate to every single top team in the EPL, His inability to buy the right players and play them at the right positions, his inability to mold a fighting squad, his inability to change tactics, his inability to learn from past mistakes, and his complete inability to listen to others and take advice is UNACCEPTABLE.

Portland would head into the last week of the season - One point behind RSL and Seattle, knowing at least one of them has to drop points because they play each other; or - One point ahead of SKC and in a playoff position heading into Vancouver; or - Tied with SKC (and the tiebreaker would be close depending on how many goals Portland can score on Colorado), one point behind Seattle, and two behind RSL, again knowing that at least one of RSL and Seattle must to drop points.

The other team's been trying to tackle me so long, a lot of people forgot what position I played.

Not a direct swap for Ox, although he has stated that is a position he would like to play in, but still keeping others out the side.

He can do things in the position he plays in that other players can't do.

Obviously he is a top player and can (and has) played in other positions for other teams across the front.