Sentences with phrase «other points of your argument»

@Freya, You actually have an earlier premise then which all other points of your argument rest on: 1) The bible is true.

Not exact matches

The point being if you have other sources of support you don't «need» to rely on SS so much, or at least I suspect that will be the argument put forward.

but in attempting to make that large number seem problematic, you actually both defeated your other argument (about its irrelevance and lack of pervasiveness) while also unintentionally pointing out the very opposite of the point you were attempting to make — the primary unity underlying a vast & varied swath of people.

In presenting an argument, I just wish that those who try to tear down the integrity of the Old Testament prophets would at least be honest, transparent, with the other point of view.

don't point them to bertrand russels teapot analogy... it just confuses them more — and you stand the chance of them actually understanding it — thus depriving others the comedy they provide when they raise such arguments from ignorance.

Obviously, I like the work of some better than that of others, and on some points I am prepared to enter the argument despite the acute limitations of my scholarship.

«If you leave your wild beliefs out of your argument, you'll have a much better chance of making a point that is logical to anyone other than you» -------- So why didn't you give that advice to Doc when he insinuated that God is anthropocentric?

A New York Times story over the weekend chronicled how some individuals and organizations eager to see same - sex marriage legalized have stopped trying to win others to their point of view through reasoned argument and have turned, instead, to emotional epithets as their main rhetorical tool.

@NAH, can rebut each of Colin's points in a reasonable manner, specifically let me call out two (both sort of related)-- the Christianity refers to only 600 years of history, and only refers to a small geography (not even the entire earth)-- why «leap of faith» argument is valid for Christianity and not for other independent faiths, which have many contradictory beliefs compared to Christianity, and if they are equally valid, how can they all be equally valid

Nor do I find any other cogent arguments in Hartshorne against the attributes of the second group, though I will not be able to argue this last point in detail.

All manner of other arguments are alleged, from the point of view of culture to the life - boat theory of triage and survival of the fittest.

Most of your arguments, as others have pointed out, are bogus.

Not meaning to contradict your argument in any way, but the truth is that the problem isn't only in pointing out se - xual impurities, but a general blindness to other forms of sin.

I have always felt that dispensationalism and covenant theology (as well as many other arguments) miss the whole point of the Gospel.

And also it would not be a weighty argument that Jesus does not, like other religious Jews, look in suspense and anxious longing into the uncertain future, but is convinced that even now the turning point of the times is at hand, and the powers of the imminent Kingdom can already be discerned.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

These contrasting positions are, of course, simply the echo of views that have contended with each other at different points in Christian history and have been a staple of argument over the last several decades within the academy.

Others can be won to your point of view if you will follow such practices as avoiding arguments, showing respect for the opinions of others, and trying to see the other's point ofOthers can be won to your point of view if you will follow such practices as avoiding arguments, showing respect for the opinions of others, and trying to see the other's point ofothers, and trying to see the other's point of view.

It's all these non-specific over simplifications of the other side's view points, that make arguments seem easily won.

Your point is well taken but what of the other side of the argument.

We might even grant, if only for the sake of argument, the pro-choicers» point that pro-lifers are not sufficiently attending to other legitimate issues, including those that might prompt a mother to end her pregnancy.

One of my own teachers told me a long time ago to be sure to understand all sides of an argument (and my extension is even to the point to argue in FAVOR of the other side).

I would reaffirm my agreement with Hartshorne on the absolutely essential point that the ontological argument, properly understood, asserts that God's existence is either necessary or impossible and, since there are no other alternatives, the argument can not be discussed as if it involved merely the alternative of existence or nonexistence.

I will sometimes point out when I think one side misstates the other's position or ignores how an argument will fail given the assumptions of the other side.

Whilst Max Verstappen's success makes a huge argument for youth, drivers like Alonso make a significant point from the other end of the F1 driver age spectrum.

To point out the flaws in the other side's arguments, the challenges their chosen candidate (s) would face in the pursuit of party cohesion and, crucially, electoral success.

In fact Brand's argument is a great example of a non sequitur, as one point does not follow from the other.

Which is another way of actually NOT making a logical argument, but instead just re-stating your point when you think you're proving it — in other words, a classic cop - out.

When I put many of these points to transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin, he responded with the only stock argument I hadn't already knocked down; that other countries are doing it, so we should too.

As Steven Weinberg points out here, the argument made against extremists ends up invoking a moral sense to argue that the religious ideas of the extremists are wrong, when the whole point of religion is that it should be the other way around.

I see people pointing out other races that may or may not be competitive, but I don't even see any arguments as to why they should be considered more competitive races than any of the ones on Chris» list.

Looking at, among other things, medieval homilies and early modern letter correspondence, a recently published dissertation at the University of Gothenburg shows how clausal arguments, and in particular clausal subjects, have been expressed at different points in time in the history of English.

Interestingly, responding to those counter arguments helps me better articulate my point and really only reinforces my original statement It's fun to have a discussion with someone who has a different opinion as long as we actually listen to each other and refrain from personal insults (had some of those, too).

Last week, as I was walking out of a screening of «Vacation,» a fellow critic, engaged in passionate argument with some other colleagues, pointed at me and said, «You!

However — Finally, once the point is made, analysed and supported, it's important to consider the other side of an argument.

However, the reason these kinds of questions are tricky is because the questioner, from his / her point of view tells me the critical information (critical from his or her point of view)-- and the folks on the other side of the argument would have provided me with other information that they think matters.

As an argument, it fails to acknowledge that there are many other, and far more interesting, points of data that can be used by teachers, parents, and schools to keep far more compelling tabs on student progress throughout the year.

At Prieto Math and Science Academy, one of our partner schools in Chicago, teachers seek to improve their students» ability to give a viable argument and to critique the reasoning of others; their entry point is teaching students to use journals to record their own ideas and the ideas of others, and using the whiteboard strategically to support student journal writing and classroom discussion.

They should be taught how to analyze conflicting points of view, explain arguments, synthetize new points into new ideas, and others.

Developmental Edit: A level of editing that takes a broad look at the manuscript to point out errors in structure, clarity, character, plot, argument, and / or other «higher thinking» points.

In the case study, your points of the argument need to be always constructed logically as they build in a cohesive manner and related to each other throughout the argument.

On the other hand, what does surprise me is the number of times that this data point is used to support the argument that reference is dead.

Writing a political science thesis is not very difficult for many students, because even though like all other theses it involves extensive research, political science topics are relatively easy and there is a lot of room for argument for and against a particular topic, so in many cases writing such thesis comes down to simply finding solid arguments and proving your point of view.

Once again, we're always keen to hear other points of view, or to have someone point out the obvious holes in the argument.

I would also have to point out the relative strong performance of the indexes in question over the past three years might skew the results in my arguments favour and not be representative of other time periods.

;P Not that I care, nor is it the point of what I'm about to discuss) Aside from the latter, just some constructive criticism, no offenses meant... I CAN repeatedly say I'm a seasoned vet of 35 years who definitely has experience with more than two dozen animals and spout an argument, but it doesn't make any of it true until I have evidence... you know, what you badgered others for, but only had excuses why you couldn't provide yours.

This area becomes a bit more gray, because while there is a very good argument for not breeding close relatives of affected and carrier dogs, we also can not afford to eliminate all dogs in the gene pool who meet this criterion — to do so would risk further constriction of the gene pool to the point where the remaining «epilepsy - free» individuals might have higher - than - normal frequency for genes that contribute to some other genetic disorder.

There are plenty of other arguments and debates going on around the Internet for both sides, but the point is that it has become a hot topic, and one that has had huge ramifications on the gaming market with the introduction of things like Online Passes and even the removal of content from the game itself.

The argument he makes it basically, «well, this might all be new stuff thematically for a videogame to explore, but it's been done by other forms of entertainment», which is the strangest god damn point that means absolutely NOTHING.

I'm not a purist but the argument of agency vs. cinematic experience feels like a mute point, video games can not out - cinema cinema, so even as some elements from other mediua can lead to innovation in video gaming, what should always be the aim of video gaming is what makes it special, and agency is not something easily found or realized in other digital media, if ever.