Consistent with the goal of the NSF Program for Long - Term Observations in the Arctic, NPEO increases the availability of long - term environmental data in the Arctic by providing data and infrastructure for
other polar science and climate investigations.
Not exact matches
The annual Arctic
Science Conference will, when opportune, combine with a meeting of oneof the societies, institutions, unions or
other organizations of scientists of the United States or of foreign counterparts of the Association concerned with the
polar regions.
The age of
polar exploration provided a wealth of information for
science to sift, while at the same time fulfilling the aspirations of nations to compete with
others and even to stake potential territorial claims, with all the attendant allure of financial gain.
ECCO model - data syntheses are being used to quantify the ocean's role in the global carbon cycle, to understand the recent evolution of the
polar oceans, to monitor time - evolving heat, water, and chemical exchanges within and between different components of the Earth system, and for many
other science applications.
Britain has a great history of
polar exploration and
science — a history of Scott and Shackleton, and many
other explorers, who all had a close link to this city, home of the British Antarctic Survey and the Scott
Polar Institute.
The tsunami of stupidity and
science denial that has washed over Washington, D.C., won't be held back by earnest calculations of long - run risks, or by the potential inundation of remote island nations, or by the news that
polar bears and
other iconic species are endangered.
ARCUS» efforts to improve the national recognition and support of Arctic research include formal and informal education, liaison with
other national
polar research entities, working with government agencies, providing a central point of contact for inquiries, facilitating community
science planning efforts, and disseminating information through reports, a newsletter, and the ARCUS website.
Did I simply come in late and actually miss the robust debate about the basic
science of the whole shebang or has there never actually been one
other than some anecdotal discussions around glaciers,
polar bears and ex vice presidents with a carbon footprint and bank account I'd love to ascribe to?
The score on PC1 shows a separation between on the one hand the position that Arctic sea ice extent is shrinking and that this poses a threat to
polar bears (most scientific articles and
science - based blogs) and on the
other side the position that Arctic sea ice is not shrinking or that it's due to natural variability and that
polar bears are not threatened (pseudo-skeptical blogs).
What «something»
other than
science might a
polar bear scientist be tempted to use in estimating the
polar bear population?