They issued a joint news release (see below) calling on the state to honor a 2006 decision by the state's highest court, which held that the state had provided inadequate financial support to New York City and
other poor school districts.
Sanchez, who has held the 25th District seat since 2011, said he wants to continue pressing for improvements in early childhood education as well as better funding for education in New Britain and
other poor school districts.
Raymond Abbott's name appeared as lead plaintiff in a court case brought by Camden and several
other poor school districts against the State of New Jersey, demanding that the state provide equal funding for all schools.
Not exact matches
It's certainly a win - win situation for these
schools, but it also creates a disturbing picture of rich kids nibbling on sushi and having enough money for the team uniforms, while
poor kids in a neighboring
district are not only getting eating subpar food, they're often selling candy and
other junk food to raise money for those same uniforms, further contributing to
poor health habits that may last a lifetime.
The Speaker and several
other key lawmakers think most of that money should go directly to aid
poor school districts.
One irate
school superintendent for the Genesee Valley called
poor districts going at each
other for
school aid a «Dickensian competition.»
Houston's
schools, which are equally minority and
poor, perform well relative to
other urban
school districts.
The proportion of students in poverty in the majority - black elementary
schools has increased over time, and remains at higher levels (currently at 91 percent
poor) than the
district's
other elementary
schools (76.6 percent
poor.)
Districts could address within -
district inequities in lots of ways — they could offer higher salaries to teachers in
poorer schools, they could have lower class sizes in
poorer schools, or they could expand
other services within
poorer schools — but local teachers» union contracts often prohibit all of these policy options.
School districts in Washington that show consistently
poor performance should be subject to state takeover, monetary penalties, or
other consequences, concludes a state panel established to devise a system of accountability for the state's
schools.
One would limit the share of state money earmarked for the state's «special needs»
school districts in
poor, urban areas, while the
other would bar the executive...
She also stressed, as did many
other witnesses, that
school districts with effective mentoring and evaluation programs have successfully identified and helped
poor - performing teachers.
Like equalization formulas in
other states, the one in Kansas was designed to help
poor, primarily urban
districts, not the sprawling, land - rich agricultural areas of the state, like Beloit, where Mr. Bottom serves as superintendent of
schools.
However, an insistence on the secular control of public funds meant that Catholic and
other church - based
schools could not receive publicly funded vouchers, even in academically failing
school districts where
other private
schools are unavailable to
poor students.
In writing regulations for the new law, Secretary of Education, John B. King, proposes that
school districts spend as much per student of state and local funds on students in
poor schools as is spent on students in the
district's
other schools.
And even before California recently revamped its statewide K - 12 funding formula to concentrate more funds in
schools with high numbers of ELLs and
other vulnerable students, the
district was targeting extra money to
schools with the greatest number of
poor students and English - language learners, he said.
However, the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence can also recommend state intervention if a
school district has been unable or unwilling to carry out the agency's recommendations to improve, and persistently
poor academic performance alone, regardless of
other indicators, warrants intervention.
«We believe money is not the answer,» said Sen. Brown, explaining instead that
districts must identify
other ways to deal with factors that contribute to
poor performance at failing
schools.
A decreased Title I allocation is challenging for a
district because it can result in fewer
district schools receiving funds under Title I. Under Title I
school allocation rules, many
schools with high numbers of low - income children do not receive support from Title I because they are surrounded by
other schools that are even
poorer, so the Title I money «runs out» before those
schools have the opportunity to receive funds.
Instead of going back to an accountability approach that was supposedly «demoralizing» teachers and
school leaders charged with helping
poor and minority kids succeed, Petrilli and
others prefer the new approaches, which attempt to focus on the growth
schools and
districts make in helping our most - vulnerable.
Further, the Court found that inadequate funding from the state is leading to inequalities and disparities between wealthy and
poor school districts, because some
districts are only able to raise a fraction of the money through local levies as
other districts, despite having a higher local levy tax rate.
As I have noted, stronger standards alone aren't the only reason why student achievement has improved within this period; at the same time, the higher expectations for student success fostered by the standards (along with the accountability measures put in place by the No Child Left Behind Act, the expansion of
school choice, reform efforts by
districts such as New York City, and efforts by organizations such as the College Board and the National Science and Math Initiative to get more
poor and minority students to take Advanced Placement and
other college prep courses), has helped more students achieve success.
In the past few years, the
district has approved one charter
school and denied at least two
others, mostly over concerns about brand - new operators with
poor financial plans.
While it is reasonable that these
schools would need more money, we now have a system where our «
poorest»
school districts are spending significantly more than
others with little to show in positive academic outcomes.
Ending traditional
school funding — especially the use of property tax dollars as a funding source for
districts and
schools (which account for 34 percent of
school funding in the Wolverine State)-- would get rid of excuses traditional
districts use to oppose all forms of
school choice, keep
poor and minority kids out of the
schools they operate, and refuse to take on
other systemic reforms.
CHICAGO — Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) President Karen Lewis criticized the Chicago Public
Schools (CPS) list of schools targeted for closures and other school actions by pointing out that not only does the policy do little to improve student achievement, but the District has a poor record of improving academic achievement among the city's most vulnerable st
Schools (CPS) list of
schools targeted for closures and other school actions by pointing out that not only does the policy do little to improve student achievement, but the District has a poor record of improving academic achievement among the city's most vulnerable st
schools targeted for closures and
other school actions by pointing out that not only does the policy do little to improve student achievement, but the
District has a
poor record of improving academic achievement among the city's most vulnerable students.
The department proposed a rule that would require local
school districts to give
schools enrolling large numbers of
poor children at least as much state and local money as
other schools — thus prompting the letter.
But the fact that the Obama administration granted Virginia a waiver in the first place in spite of its record of obstinacy on systemic reform, along with the fact that many of the 32
other states granted waivers (along with the
District of Columbia) have also set low expectations for
districts and
schools to improve the achievement of the
poor and minority kids in their care, has put President Obama in the uncomfortable position of supporting the soft bigotry of low expectations for children — especially those who share his race and skin color.
Through the state's capital outlay guarantee,
school districts considered «property -
poor» can qualify for extra funding for capital projects and needs to put them on even footing with
other districts.
-- In a December report on
school efficiency and funding, no clear factors were found between funding, efficiency, and achievement,
other than
poor districts require more money.
What if we were to abolish all
school districts and give
poor people choices that
other people have?
Schools in these
poor communities received significantly more money than
other «hold harmless»
school districts, not counting Bloomfield Hills.
He declared unconstitutional and «irrational» the way Connecticut funds and oversees local public
schools; he found that the state government has the enforceable responsibility under Connecticut's constitution to provide all students an adequate education — not just the wealthy suburban kids who rank first nationwide in reading scores, but also the many «functionally illiterate» high -
school graduates from the 30
poorest Connecticut
school districts, which rank below Mississippi and 39
other states in those same scores.
Just as importantly, the waiver gambit reaffirms the role of states in structuring education without holding them accountable for how they spend federal dollars (or for providing them with high - quality teaching, curricula, and
school options); this includes the administration's move through the waiver process to bless implementation of Plessy v. Ferguson - like proficiency targets that allow
districts and
other school operators to effectively ignore
poor and minority students.
Michigan's policy of unfettered charter expansion, together with a money - follows - the - child
school funding system decimated Detroit's public
schools, along with
other poor districts, and has left
schools across that state intensely segregated.
Meanwhile Trump's ascent into the White House bodes ill for one of the Obama Administration's most - admirable efforts: Holding
districts accountable for overusing out - of -
school suspensions and
other harsh
school discipline that put
poor and minority children onto the
school - to - prison pipeline, an important issue both on the education and criminal justice reform fronts.
The groups are concerned about additional components of the proposed Senate bill, including elimination of the Federal Maintenance of Effort portion, which would provide
districts with more flexibility in how they fund their programs, and the enabling of portability of Title I funds, which would allow funds allocated to
poor performing
schools to follow its students to
other schools they choose to attend.
«There are many relatively high - poverty
school districts where students appear to be learning at a faster rate than kids in
other, less
poor districts,» said lead researcher Sean Reardon.
«These results could easily indicate nothing
other than the simple fact that charter
schools are typically asked to serve problematic students in low - performing
districts with many
poor, minority children.»
teacher6402: «The reason that scores and achievement are so low in urban
districts is due to many factors: transient leadership, unqualified administrators, lack of curricula, poverty and transient students, lack of parental and community support, politicians posturing at the expense of
poor and urban communities, and yes - ineffective teachers who often get in to urban
school districts because they lack the skill set and content knowledge to get in to
other districts.»
That includes, according to Till and
other critics, yawning pay gaps between rich and
poor counties and uncertainty for
school district leaders now tasked with negotiating scores of contracts with essential administration, critics say.
While California, thanks to wakeup calls in 1906 and 1933, has pushed to bolster
schools and
other vital structures, there, too, experts say, there are gaps, particularly in
poorer school districts.
Do you know anyone with children in
schools in Oregon, British Columbia, Washington state,
poorer school districts in California, India, or
other known seismic hot spots?
Remember, things like a sub-par location,
poor light, terrible view, below - average
school district, high local crime rate and
other negatives might be part of the reason why a home went into foreclosure in the first place.