Sentences with phrase «other question put to»

But if this biography is an open and frank one, then the other question put to me by one of Alan's former ministerial colleagues was relevant, «Does he really merit a full biography?»

Not exact matches

Other investors, it turned out, were asking the same question and began talking to others they knew who had put in money.

The cuts have put financial markets on edge, sparking worries of a «currency war» as other countries feel pressure to devalue and raising questions about the health of the world's second - largest economy, where growth is already slowing.

Google did not answer any of the specific questions put to it, and provided only a general statement denying it had joined Prism or any other surveillance program.

The question that should be put to those calling for restrictions on imports is: In an effort to save jobs in one industry, do you care about or even know of its cost and disastrous effects in other industries?

Or to put this question the other way around, why are ten million American homeowners being treated like Lehman, if the Fed believes that they are as savable as Countrywide and A.I.G.?

... «OK, I'll put you down for Christian then» «Next question, do you want others to suffer and die?»

The other had not a word to say to this and the peasant who put the question fell silent again.

There are lots of other physics that disprove the possibility of this, but I think this is enough to seriously put it in question.

Maybe to say «that is a good question but I cant give you a satisfactory answer» maybe put the ball back into his / her court by offerring an invitation to the Alpha course or to come along to a small Bible study group st your home or an invitation to a non Church tyoe activity with other Christians, walk, bike ride, five a side football or other sporting things, befriend them and truly love them without an agenda.

Within the next decade we shall have assiduously to canvass the question whether the religious orders and congregations will really put into practice the Decree on the Appropriate Renewal of the Religious Life, whether they will produce a style of life and of government which, on the one hand, is truly suitable for our time and, on the other, is seriously engaged only in the service of Christ.

If on the other hand you ask about «last resort» or «innocent immunity,» others will grant your fight to put the question.

That's putting the question bluntly, but there's really no other way of putting it if you're going to put it at all.

Putting forward the example of the Roman centurion and his faith in Jesus's ability to heal the sick is simply a distraction that keeps us from considering this other question: what would Jesus want his disciples to do?

The other source for religious demography is «poll data» drawn from individuals» answers to questions put to them in surveys.

I have also found myself looking into the faces of that diversified company of informal students embracing, for example, my colleagues teaching in other fields, as well as those other friends from all walks with whom I spend sustaining nonworking hours and who, ever and again even in the midst of play, put me back to work with «simple» innocent questions about the Bible.

Nonetheless, the Justices gravely declared that «the character of a nation of people who aspire to live according to the rule of law» is ultimately to be measured by the people's willingness to put aside their deeply held moral and religious views and accept the Court's pronouncements on this and other divisive questions.

At the same time, though, our own particular way of putting questions to the sources that are believed to contain a revelatory word will cause other hidden riches in these classic sources to go unnoticed by us, and it is the merit of Barth's theology to have emphasized this point.

It puts a question mark next to every other idea of God that ignores the very concrete suffering of peoples due to economic, social, and politically structured deprivation.»

As for your other questions, no, they are not addressed in the book, but I have addressed them in other writings here on this blog (which I hope to put in a future book), and my answers to those questions are also not the typical answers found in the writings of most Christians.

Your statement begs the question... Why put up a billboard in order to claim a «non belief» and in the process point specifically to others who do?

Of course this still leaves the question of what to do with disappointing human behaviour — the «abuse, «war and addictions... [and that] innocents suffer from the sins of others» as you have put it.

All the other habits of composition that Ford attributes to Whitehead rest on the two attributions we have just put into question; for we are told that the insertions of later writings into earlier ones, and the overall arrangements of writings in a given book, are meant to induce readers to disregard passages conveying abandoned doctrines or positions or, if the doctrines and positions are kept in modified form, to reinterpret them in terms of their final or mature formulations.

In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.

After the chief monk spoke, the young students were vying with each other in putting critical questions to the monk.

Gays should be able to put each other as beneficiaries on their pensions, or be able to see each other in the hospital if the other is hurt without any questions asked, but being able to be married - a unity between a man, a women, and God — that shouldn't be allowed.

Or to put the question in other words, what differences are there between the God to adult relationship, and the parent to child relationship?

Hey Erica no of course that's a legitimate question — I don't put grapes in smoothies as much as other fruits simply because they're not as nutritionally dense and I just tend to mostly cook with the fruits which I love the taste of — but that the great thing about the recipes, and especially smoothies, you can use it as a guide to add things you have in the fridge or whatever so I'm so glad you're adding different things!

«We also have an innovation wall where people can put up ideas and questions to help inspire innovation within their own minds, read what other people think and start off conversations which will hopefully lead to new innovations.

«They made me put on these earphones and take this test, all sorts of questions on it, math, other stuff, nothing to do with baseball,» Robinson said.

There are questions to be asked Why was jenkinson loaned out if Bellerin is not ready Why was Coquen (sorry can't spell) sent out if he was good enough 12 games ago tom e named Why keep Campbell if he's not good enough wouldn't money from his sale be better spent on a CB Why when SAGNA / Viera / and other 30 plus players were only offered 1 year contracts yet we are now scratching a midfield together with flamini / Arteta Why when things are not working e.g Moreal at CB do we persist with it I can put all these decisions down to wenger, and that's not bringing up the lack of signings

It is not out of question to think if a power blocking team, or a team trying to put an emphasis on running better like Det, could have him higher than some other teams.

I have some questions to ask about our dear club in other to put my view about the way things are with our club in perspective.

all season while we had ozil he has only been allowed to play in his main position 2 times once against villa and other against galetaseray and in this game we for the first time played with two natral wingers with ozil in the number 10 and a fast cf for the first time ever since ozil has been here and you all know the outcome, part from that wenger has shifted ozil out wide all season and turned him into a scapegoat for the media and fans but as soon as ozil gets injured the next game wenger plays with 2 natrual wingers and put wilshire in middle with cazorla, so the question is wernger trying to destroy ozil?

I'm sure AAers will have other questions that they would like to put forward, Why not list them in your comments below.

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

So we posted this question to the Smart Mom App and this is what Lauren, Lauren M, she shared a Mamma hack and this is what she says, as far as what her hack is, she says, «Get a breast pumping bra it will make life so much easier for pumping and you can just put in the breast pump and you have two hands free to do other things with».

You not required to provide anyone with an explanation about how long you plan to breastfeed, why you feel the need to do it in the open or any other questions that makes you feel put on the spot.

I put my daughter on the bus at 7:10 a.m., and drive my son to preschool at 7:40 a.m. so that I can make it to work by 8:00 a.m. Between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. at work is a whole other story: register applications, make phone calls, sign in clients and answer their questions.»

And finally, question # 3: It is to my understaning that initially I should be giving her 2 «bedtimes» - in other words, I should give her the 7:00 pm feeding and then at 8:30 «officially» put her to bed and then give her a potential dream feed at 10:00.

I run a modest but pretty vocal community of people who take issue with the current state of breastfeeding promotion (as well as people who are totally cool with breastfeeding promotion, but ended up using formula for whatever reason and are willing to put up with the constant drama and debate because they have few other communities where they feel safe asking questions about formula feeding).

As he puts it: «If we're going to inspire other people with the idea of good politics, if we're going to reach out and connect to a generation who see politics linked to a capitalism that isn't working for them, then a generation of us who believe that capitalism can and must work better, have to adjust and reach out and open up and show them that we're prepared to ask the difficult questions.»

Crucially, current approaches to devolution via bespoke city regions and other territorial deals will create asymmetries in policy remit amongst MPs in different parts of England that resemble the very «West Lothian Question'that EVEL is supposed to put to rest.

The other big sticking point is over the nature of the question to be eventually put to Scottish voters.

In April this year, he said Putin «can be forced into all sorts of directions if sufficient political and other pressure is put on him», but then refused to answer questions on the subject at a Federation of Small Businesses meeting.

«You have to put the Armageddon question the other way - if no action takes place following this appalling use of chemical weapons, what sort of Armageddon will the Syrian people be facing?»

I put the same question to some political sorts the other day, and wonder whether your answers will be the same.

But the society's conclusions have been challenged by a House of Lords spokesman, who said they failed to take into account other work conducted by peers including serving on committees, amending legislation and putting down written questions.

He noted, for example, that the other four constitutional questions to be put to voters on the November ballot don't read as advocacy to persuade voters.

(Might there be value in working with NEF or others to put formally put some questions forward seeking a response through whatever the appropriate channels are)?