There are certainly
other reasons for opposing official religion.
Not exact matches
«The
reason you won't see a compromise anytime soon is because Congress actually acting in the wake of Orlando would be a tacit admission on the
other side that guns had something to do with what happened in Orlando as
opposed to ISIS,» he said, using an acronym
for Islamic State.
It stands to
reason that the typical entrepreneur has a high value
for freedom and autonomy, or that they have an ownership mentality,
opposed to the employee mentality at the
other end of the continuum.
Connections with
others are a big
reason why people pay to work in a communal space, as
opposed to working from home
for free or renting a nondescript office.
Other, more conservative Republicans (known as the Freedom Caucus) who
opposed the bill had the opposite
reasoning: The proposed legislation didn't offer enough change
for their tastes.
It is
for this
reason that teachers and
other school officials who actively
oppose the principles of free democracy as expressed in the Constitution (especially the Bill of Rights) should be excluded from positions in education.
Stan is confused because he thinks Wallis is a stalking horse
for James Dobson, the National Right to Life Committee and all the
other pro-life signatories of «Come Let us
Reason Together,» while I am confused because I have this crazy idea that Wallis, while «personally
opposed» to abortion does not want to legally impose.
Those who made and continue to make cogent, well -
reasoned, loving arguments
for marriage as it has been defined throughout human history continue to get branded as hateful bigots, not because they are, but because
others who have
opposed gay rights have been.
There's nothing new in the observation that
opposing extremists tend to feed one another, each providing
reasons for the
other's hysteria.
Some objected to Islam itself, carrying signs like «MOSQUE LEADERS SUPPORT KILLING CONVERTS,» while
others opposed the project
for environmental
reasons.
But I chose to try Marion's, and I chose it
for three
reasons: 1) again, it was cited most often, 2) it calls
for the type of yeast — active dry, as
opposed to instant — that I usually keep on hand, and 3) it's very simple, with no beating of egg whites or
other additional steps.
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly
for obvious economic and military
reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an
opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value
for most of our outgoing players and
other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
Iran on the
other hand, will
oppose formation of Kurdistan
for the exact same
reasons.
The US is generally
opposed to nuclear proliferation
for the
reasons that
other answers have given.
It's very hard to define «Right Wing» today, especially since most people referred to as «Right Wing» today not only have nothing in common with the historical origin of the term (French Monarchists after French Revolution), but don't have much common politically with each
other aside from
opposing some or all of the policies labeled «Left Wing», and even that
for a wide variety of
reasons.
If Mr. de Blasio gets his way and fulfills this campaign promise, those who
oppose the horse carriages on principle (or
for a variety of
other reasons), will surely rejoice.
For these and
other reasons, I will be urging my fellow citizens to actively
oppose any initiative to adopt its recommendations.»
Many Catholics and
others who
oppose gay marriage and abortion, but think it not politically correct to speak about it to friends and pollsters, would vote
for Paladino without saying this
reason.
A lot of people, both inside and outside the scientific community, are viscerally
opposed to the idea of
other universes,
for the simple
reason that we can't observe them — at least as far as we know.
While I endorse this article's opinions and am
opposed to the death penalty, I must disagree with the editors» statement that «scientific protocols
for executions can not be established, because killing animal subjects
for no
reason other than to see what kills them best would clearly be unethical.»
While the opening scene, which serves only as back - story and general
reasons as to why it takes so long
for Raleigh (Charlie Hunnam) to return to the Jaeger game, is fluff
for the film and even in the moment felt unnecessary as
opposed to just being retro - actively less awesome than the
other greater action sequences.
Such suspicions appear to be confirmed early on, when
for no good
reason, clips are included to make Republican presidential candidates John McCain and Mitt Romney look foolish
for opposing heavy spending on tracking down the militant mastermind of September 11th and
other deadly terrorist attacks.
But perhaps the strongest objection to national standards that we have repeated at JPGB (here, here, and here) is that even if the current set of proposed national standards is an improvement
for some states (and less good than
others), there is strong
reason to fear that people
opposed to sensible, rigorous standards will gain control over the newly created national standards infrastructure and be in a position to impose their nonsense on everyone.
[The politics of rationing education is a
reason why districts and
other traditionalists also
oppose the expansion of public charter schools and
other forms of school choice that are helping Black and Latino children attain high quality education; charters fall outside of the control of districts and therefore, open the doors of opportunity
for those historically denied great teachers and college - preparatory curricula.]
If
for no
other reasons, we
oppose this charter school coming to Stamford.
Such a point also shines light on the fact that EdTrust and
other centrist Democrat reformers backing the plan have been silent about the Obama administration's sloppy and shoddy process
for granting waivers, especially as President Barack Obama struggles to keep office; it is hard
for waiver gambit supporters to complain about Florida's implementation of one of the alternatives to AYP they support without pointing out how the Obama administration's own mishandling of the effort allowed
for such antics in the first place (or giving movement conservatives more
reasons to
oppose a strong federal role in reforming American public education).
It's just my opinion, and I know of
other writers who feel violently
opposed to self - publishing, but many authors self - publish
for reasons other than vanity.
I think it must be because it's the stock market as
opposed to real estate, steel, technology, media, manufacturing, etc... I've never heard luck as the
reason for a business mogul's success, but if you think about it, billionaires who made their fortune in industry by building or developing businesses outperformed
others that were trying to do the same thing.
The
reason the American Bird Conservancy, National Audubon Society, The Wildlife Society, and
others oppose TNR is, explained chief Animal Control Officer
for Pompano Beach, Florida, David Aycock, during a barn - burner of a City Commission meeting Tuesday night, «that these animals are not safe out there — on their own, by themselves.
As I learned tricks to overcome obstacles (like the proper use of rice balls), I was able to forgive just about every
other transgression that [i] Odama [/ i] hurled at me, from seemingly poor AI to questionable pinball physics, but no pinball - based game should ever have a time limit placed on what is an inherently wildly - inaccurate interface: you're supposed to lose when the ball goes between the flippers (or in the additional case of [i] Odama [/ i], when the Ninten Bell is forced between them by
opposing forces) and not
for any
other reason.
It is goofy, quirky, and while the gameplay is more like real life (3D field and whatnot), it is obviously not to be taken seriosuly, as
opposed to something like Dead Space (which also shouldn't be washed out
for other reasons).
Fine, if you would like to suggest an alternative term to describe climate change as caused by man made GHG emissions as
opposed to the climate change which has occured in the past
for other reasons then I will happily use it.
We have also
opposed subsidies
for natural gas vehicles and
other biofuels
for these same
reasons,» the Koch letter reads.
· Regulation is often preferred to economic incentives
for two
reasons: 1) industry prefers to protect plants that are already built, and 2) some environmental groups
oppose taxes because they make the cost of environmental protection transparent, ie the very factor which
others argue is a positive asset is seen by some as being negative.
The
other thing to remember is that there's no
reason to fixate on methane hydrates in particular, as
opposed to the carbon stored in peats in Arctic permafrosts
for example.
For example would they force a treatment on someone who opposes it for religious or other reasons, where a physician would not do
For example would they force a treatment on someone who
opposes it
for religious or other reasons, where a physician would not do
for religious or
other reasons, where a physician would not do so?
It follows that the
reasons for one of the joint custodial parents wanting to move, or the
reason for the
other joint custodial parent
opposing the move, would be very relevant to determining whether the children's needs can be met by only one of the parents.
Curiously, the FLA does not also require the court to consider the
other parent's
reasons for opposing the move.»
The Committee determined that
for confidentiality
reasons, it is unwise to «cc» one's client in on all but purely administrative emails, such as notifications of future court dates: «Recognizing the obligation to protect a client's secrets and confidences, it is not advisable
for a lawyer to «cc» their client in a message to
opposing counsel concerning the subject of the representation or any
other matter that may give rise to a response that could reveal a client confidence or secret.»
You can demonstrate that you've researched ThoughtWorks and thought carefully about why you want to work
for the business by including a single good
reason in your covering letter about why you are pursuing a career with ThoughtWorks specifically, as
opposed to any
other IT company.
(1) the child in question is not three years of age or younger; (2) both parents seem reasonably capable of meeting the child's need
for care and guidance; (3) both parents wish to continue their active involvement in raising the child; (4) the parents seem capable of making
reasoned decisions together
for the benefit of the child;... (5) joint custody would not impose substantial economic hardship on the parent who
opposes it; and (6) joint custody wouldprobably disrupt the parent - child relationships less than
other custodial alternatives.
Additionally, our Supreme Court noted Pennsylvania courts require the following considerations in relocation cases: (1) the economic and
other potential advantages of the move; (2) the likelihood the move would substantially improve the quality of life
for the custodial parent and the children and is not the result of a whim of the custodial parent; (3) the motives behind the parent's
reasons for seeking or
opposing the move; and (4) the availability of a realistic substitute visitation arrangement that will adequately foster an ongoing relationship between the non-custodial parent and the children.
Of course, it didn't help that hhgregg did not create compelling
reasons for consumers to buy its washing machines and televisions, as
opposed to buying from any
other electronics retailer.