«we all believe in the same God (sorry atheists)» I think
every other religion in the world that isn't judaism, Christianity (including Mormonism), and Islam, would like to refute that comment (don't worry, it's only a few thousand denominations of faith with billions of believers).
Do nt you take a chance on your eternity by not believing in all
the other religions in world?
Also, if you are not aware of your surroundings and
the other religions in the world, how can you possibly exclaim with the full backing of your heart that your religion is the true religion?
Maybe Islam should try to understand and TOLERATE
other religions in this world, instead of referring to everyone as Zionists, Infidels and Crusaders.
If Christians are right, how do you explain
every other religion in the world?
I doubt you could even get your fellow Christians agree to what is the truth, let alone
the other religions in the world.
It's the difference between Christianity and
every other religion in the world.
The doctrine of grace distinguishes the Christian faith from
every other religion in the world, as well as from the cults.
Not exact matches
There are
other religions than yours
in the
world.
That being that during the crusades the Islamic
world was more advanced than the Christian
world in every way including their acceptance of
other religions.
In fact, Islam is the only
other world's
religion besides Christianity that recognizes Jesus!!!
In fact, when the topic of teaching religion in schools crops up and you suggest to those pushing the idea that maybe it would be OK to teach religion in a comparative context, with many of the world's major religions examined objectively alongside each other, the creationist fundies are the ones yelling the loudest that that must never, ever be allowed — it's only their view that's welcom
In fact, when the topic of teaching
religion in schools crops up and you suggest to those pushing the idea that maybe it would be OK to teach religion in a comparative context, with many of the world's major religions examined objectively alongside each other, the creationist fundies are the ones yelling the loudest that that must never, ever be allowed — it's only their view that's welcom
in schools crops up and you suggest to those pushing the idea that maybe it would be OK to teach
religion in a comparative context, with many of the world's major religions examined objectively alongside each other, the creationist fundies are the ones yelling the loudest that that must never, ever be allowed — it's only their view that's welcom
in a comparative context, with many of the
world's major
religions examined objectively alongside each
other, the creationist fundies are the ones yelling the loudest that that must never, ever be allowed — it's only their view that's welcome.
How about all lbg people and especially athiests just stop eating anywhere that has a history or management that is from a religious faith that means almost no grocery stores no restaurants 98 % of the
world believes
in a
religion the
other 2 % can just not interact with the rest of us if thats what they want no skin off our backs make the
world a better place just become reclusive your already hateful, distrustful and judgmental
«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our
religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was
in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of
others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on
others, hath established and maintained false
religions over the greatest part of the
world and through all time.»
Oh, I could mention
other religions where neither historically neither today hold 50 % of the
world's population
in one such standing.
And By the way... 1
in 50 would be only 2 %... the number of gay priests and higher is quite a bit higher than the
world average, and higher than
in any
other religion... which is explained (at least
in theory of why that is the case)
in the frontline I saw... they estimated it is closer to one
in 5
do I need any approval before I practice my
religion, do I have to prove my
religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun
in 21st century because there is too much crime
in this
world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking
in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing
in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my
religion originated or back
in time ask my guru questions about western
world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach
other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
Perhaps Sabio can speak to the amount of trickery present
in other world religions as he has studied them more than I.
Are
other world religions equally legitimate and relevant to the one you follow,
in your opinion?
Can't CNN find something else meaningful to report: the number of children
in the US that go to sleep hungry; can we ever have a country that is not run by corporations; why has journalism gone down the toilet; why can't we tolerate each
other; the real truth — organized
religion divides people
in this
world instead of unitng them.
They happen
in many
other parts of the
world to ppl of all
religions.
The reader is encouraged to take that seriously, to weigh the statements
in this book against research and observations on the knowable
world, and to consider them
in relation to the thousands of
other religions from throughout history that also profess with absolute certainty to be the one «Truth.»
But if you insist on your point of view I would expect that you could be one of those intended with such operations agenda to bring
religions to fighting each
other in this same method
world wide reducing God believers on the globe..?
Every
religion in the
world, past and present, stems from the same basic premise «it's probably a good idea to be nice to each
other» after that it gets twisted so that one small group of people can have some measure of control over a larger mass of people.
In a speech earlier this year, Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, permanent observer of the Holy See to the United Nations and former apostolic nuncio to Iraq and Jordan, challenged Americans to protect religious freedom in their country: «While nobody would confuse the marginalization of religion with the actual killing of Christians in other parts of the world, it is through this marginalizing that violent persecution is born.&raqu
In a speech earlier this year, Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, permanent observer of the Holy See to the United Nations and former apostolic nuncio to Iraq and Jordan, challenged Americans to protect religious freedom
in their country: «While nobody would confuse the marginalization of religion with the actual killing of Christians in other parts of the world, it is through this marginalizing that violent persecution is born.&raqu
in their country: «While nobody would confuse the marginalization of
religion with the actual killing of Christians
in other parts of the world, it is through this marginalizing that violent persecution is born.&raqu
in other parts of the
world, it is through this marginalizing that violent persecution is born.»
i'm pretty sure that all the
religions exist
in this
world promote good deeds and prohibit any bad deeds that can cause harm to the
others..
While I do not consider myself an expert on all the religious writings of all of the main
religions in the
world, I have read most of the main religious texts for most of the main
world religions, and while it is not uncommon to find violent events being described
in these
other religious books, no
other set of religious writings comes even close to describing the violence and bloodshed that one finds within the pages of the Hebrew Scriptures.
No
other religion has God infiltrating your
world, taking on your flesh, dying
in your place, and resurrecting to confirm your future with him.
Joan Bakewell,
in the February 6th edition of The Times, decided that the Pope's decision to lift decrees of excommunication from four Lefebvrist bishops, one of whom absurdly denies the historical veracity of the mass extermination of Jews during the Second
World War, should be linked to his Regensburg Address:
in her view this was a sign of an increased antagonism on the part of the Vatican towards
other religions.
There are myriad of beliefs and
religions that got corrupted by human hands as any
other thing
in world.
Whatever the merits of
other religions, it remains an undeniable fact — explain it how one will — that the most ardent and most massive blaze of collective love that has ever appeared
in the
world burns here and now
in the heart of the Church of God.
For this inherited outlook which has situated faith and
religion in the
other - worldly regards the
world as «faithless» or religionless, as perfectly neutral and secular, and holds that any imposition of the sacred and religious on the
world is a myth, a projection of the mind.
It is common factual knowledge that christianity has done significantly more than Islam or any
other world religion (this is not a knock on
other religions)
in terms of humanitarian giving.
The vast majority of Christians
in the
world today, as well as those of
other religions, find their calling within this system.
In the 1500s, King Sigismund of Transylvania, who was converted to Unitarianism by his court minister, issued the
world's first Edict of Religious Toleration, allowing his subjects to choose to observe
religions other than the King's.
This, combined with our understanding that we can seek wisdom from
other world religions in addition to our Christian roots, puts us outside generally recognized boundaries of Christianity.
the film makers do know though that
religion is a top priority
in EGypt above any
other country
in the
world.
In many places, the growing influence of
other major
world religions like Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam has threatened to crowd out the proclamation of the gospel.
The
religions have caused more death and destruction
in the
world than any
other source, except maybe the plague.
No
other structure
in the
world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made
in the name of some nation, race, social class,
religion, or ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.
He talks about the «goodness as we possess» (such as altruistic acts) and says that even if
religion did no
other harm, its carefully nurtured divisiveness is enough to make it «a significant force for evil
in the
world.»
The liturgical heritage of Judaism, the psychological and practical needs of the worshiping group, and the inexorable pressure of ideas and customs
in the Mediterranean
world, especially
in the mystery
religions, presaged the development
in Christianity, as
in other faiths, of ritual and sacrament.
Noting the public resurgence of
religion in world history, the present book examines Muslim, Sikh, and
other instances of violence that attend that resurgence.
due to some crazy religious beliefs out there
in the
world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow
religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry
in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when
others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.
In other words, the scientific materialist maintains that there is a conflict between science and religion, and that it is intrinsic and a priori, in the sense that it would exist even if science had not yet made any definite discoveries about the worl
In other words, the scientific materialist maintains that there is a conflict between science and
religion, and that it is intrinsic and a priori,
in the sense that it would exist even if science had not yet made any definite discoveries about the worl
in the sense that it would exist even if science had not yet made any definite discoveries about the
world.
Another day of
religion marring the
world for no
other reason than that religious people believe
in something that just is not there.
This acceptance of what he takes to be «the essence of Christianity» explains why it is possible for Whitehead,
in other books such as
Religion in the Making and
in the chapter on science and
religion in Science and the Modern
World, to reveal himself as generally sympathetic to the Christian enterprise.
too true; you're right, we are holistic people
in a holistic
world living holistic lives and political theory,
religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many
others are all so inextricably intertwined with each
other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)
NOTHING
in fact it sounds like Mormonism &
other religions around
world.
They can turn to underemphasized traditions within the Judeo - Christian heritage, both biblical and post biblical, highlighting the motif of stewardship; they can turn to contemporary developments
in any and science; and they can turn to feminism and to
other world religions.