Sentences with phrase «other religious names»

While the name has spiritual and religious connotations, the name is much more accessible than other religious names that deter parents from using them.

Not exact matches

1: Have no other gods — NOT A LAW = > In God we trust is on our legal currency 2: Make no graven image — NOT A LAW = > intellectual property is a God to many, we have tones of laws protecting against false copies 3: Don't take the name in vain — NOT A LAW = > false testimony is a crime as is swearing in some states 4: Honor the Sabbath — NOT A LAW = > employment law in many states prohibits forced labor on religious days 5: Honor thy father and mother — NOT A LAW = > minors have limited right to transact commerce under 19.

The quran, unlike other religious books, mentions the other religions by name condoning hatred and violence specifically against Jews and Christians and non believers

Jeff - Most Catholics have no religious convictions about the other issues you named.

In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.

Most of us are concerned about how his religious views might or might not affect his policies, but you on the other hand, are worried about his underwear and his name.

Some of them are religious sinners and probably suffer from all sorts of spiritual blindness to their own sin, and how they mistreat others in the name of God.

Yes, you are correct that the religious leaders of Christendom gave their blessing to its members to kill others «in the name of Christ», such as Catholic Dominican inquisitor Tomas de Torquemada (1420 - 98) of Spain, who ruled tyrannically for 15 years (1483 - 98, with the blessings of Pope Sixtus IV [who praise him for «directing his zeal to those matters that contribute to the praise of God»] and Innocent VIII) and saw that over 114,000 (of which 10, 220 were burned at the stake) people were put to death.

(Updated) USCIRF's new list of religious freedom violators has familiar names, but contrasts with other lists.

There is no doubt in it that you have not created yourself someone or whatever your believes are you have been created you can call it whatever name you choose and there are physical laws in that universe so you can call that force behind those fundamental laws is The Creator so Creator is not an issue it is religious practice we may disagree with each other

Now, you claim the others were atheist, but did they do what they did in the name of atheism, like so many religious zealots have claimed they did things for their gods?

But one could say that the movement had never been other than «religiocified» «-- though it was the «Reverend» prefixing names like King, Young, Shuttlesworth, Fauntroy, Abernathy and Bevel that made the public aware of the deep religious roots of the civil rights movement and of black rhetoric.

Curiously, there is little to no effective protest (within the United States or the wider world) of the religious persecution of the Coptic Christians (and other non-Muslims) BY Muslims (in Egypt and the wider stretches of geography ruled in the name of and / or for Islami).

In my opinion it probably served a purpose for a time, but I agree that what may have started as a sincere desire to question presuppositions now has become a place where people are about name, career, money, ego, etc. just like every other established religious structure.

This déchristianisation included abolishing contemplative religious orders; confiscating monastic and other ecclesiastical properties; forcing the clergy to sign an oath of loyalty to the state in the Civil Constitution of the Clergy (1790); killing thousands of non-oath-taking priests in the Vendée uprising of 1793; pillaging churches and monasteries throughout France and Europe to finance the revolutionary armies fighting abroad; the abrogation of the Gregorian calendar and attempt to introduce a new one based on Revolutionary - era sensibilities; the renaming of streets and locales from saints» names to figures and ideals of the Revolution; the brief transformation of the venerable Notre Dame cathedral into a «Temple of Reason,» dedicated «to philosophy»; and, not least, the abduction and exile of no less than two popes, Pius VI (1798) and Pius VII (1809).

In other words, they're dumb enough to get in a self righteous name calling uproar for the simple sake of offending amd being offended over a religious holiday they don't beleive in anyways but still want to celebrate.

We take our inhuman behavior; we bless it with religious phrases and religious jargon; then we beat on one another in the name of God so that Catholics and Protestants feel justified in killing each other in Ireland, and Christians and Moslems do likewise in Lebanon.

There is no where in any part of Quran or Sunnah where it says people or youth are to be chained... and kept in dungeons... Thisnis ignorance, arrogance and conspiracy done by ill hearted people in the name of religion when it is by no mean a part of religion... I have seen such cases only at remote poor areas when they have mentally sick youth or people who could be dangerous for others and can not afford to hospitalize are being kept chained like that but not in religious establishments, rather at places where fraud witch doctors who claim that those are possessed...!!!

Otherwise the only way to view those wars, is as all other wars — one group of thugs attempting to kill another group of thugs, both doing so in the name of their own ego, misappropriating whatever political, religious, and social pressure and propaganda they can, to their cause.

ISIS has bombed revered religious sites, murdered hundreds and tortured and enslaved many others - all in the name of building an Islamic state.

The blood of so many people have been spilled in the name of God by Christians as well as many other religious sects.

New research released by a Christian insurer has revealed that three quarters of UK adults can not name any of the activities that take place inside their local church other than regular services and religious festivals.

It is also an assurance that these absolutely respected leading intellectuals from the 20th Century scholarship, of whom most were religious, have agreed to have each other's names associated with their own and that they felt comfortable with what each other were saying in an academic setting and commanded world - wide respect as conservative, careful, and sincere, life - long teachers, academics and scholars.

Democratic movements, on the other hand, reflect a religious spirit, when in the name of truth, equity, and universal rights the idols of race, class, economic privilege, party, and nation are tumbled down.

«Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, and other none religious peoples around the world have been waging war and torturing and killing people for centuries in the name of non religion.»

The Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, and other none religious peoples around the world have been waging war and torturing and killing people for centuries in the name of non religion.

Like the religious people in Jesus» day, many in Christianity seem to prefer to follow the first Joshua......... The first Joshua sought to kill others in the name of God.......

In Village Atheists: How America's Unbelievers Made Their Way in a Godly Nation, Leigh Eric Schmidt tells the story of these unbelievers (who also went by «infidels,» «atheists,» «secularists,» «freethinkers,» and other names) through extended portraits of four «public atheists,» who «built infidel personas of far - flung notoriety upon their religious ruptures.»

I come from «shameless» caretakers, abandonment, ridicule, abuse, neglect — perfectionistic systems I am empowered by the shocking intensity of a parent's rage The cruel remarks of siblings The jeering humiliation of other children The awkward reflection in the mirrors The touch that feels icky and frightening The slap, the pinch, the jerk that ruptures trust I am intensified by A racist, sexist culture The righteous condemnation of religious bigots The fears and pressures of schooling The hypocrisy of politicians The multigenerational shame of dysfunctional family systems MY NAME IS TOXIC SHAME

Muslim appeasers who compare crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed EXPILICITLY in the name of Islam are comparing apples to oranges.

My working definition of the congregation is this: A congregation is a group that possesses a special name and recognized members who assemble regularly to celebrate a more universally practiced worship but who communicate with each other sufficiently to develop intrinsic patterns of conduct, outlook, and story.9 We can sharpen our appreciation of congregational structure by comparing its thick culture with that of other religious associations.

And Religious people have NEVER been condescending, they have NEVER persecuted others for their beliefs, They have NEVER killed in the name of their God or even worse used the name of their God to justify killings for political, territorial, and economic reasons or even just because they hate someone.

Yes because as we all know no other culture ever names their children after religious figures (Jesus, Peter, Paul, Joseph, Mary, etc...).

Without proclamation, the symbols (crossresurrection - incarnation) lose their tensive, religious reality and become occasions for other kinds of reflection... Only with a sense of the religious - event reality named proclamation is the New Testament recognized anew as the Christian classic text, the scripture.

you sit there in your home having nothing to do with anything that happened, then blame someone else who is in that same position for what happened, and he has to condemn it, and apparently he's guilty because of his religion... and about «no other religious freedoms in muslim countries»... you cant name a SINGLE muslim county that denies religious practice... not a single, including saudi arabia... just because they don't premit building religious buildings doesn't mean they don't respectively let you practice whatever you want to practice... unlike in some WESTERN countries they are banning religious practices such as; the headscarf!

Like a coward he refuses to look at the camera, has a smug, holier - than - thou expression, hates how he was born so he has mutilated his ears, too lazy to shave and get a real job he makes money from preaching his religious beliefs to others, gets his «opinion» published SOLELY because he steals Stedman Graham's name to try to validate himself.

Why do we keep protecting religious people's rights to cause harm to others in the name of their God?

Religion, teaching and promoting hate, contempt or others, self - righteous anger and acting on it (OK by God) ignorance and that if you have religion you have rights but others who don't subscribe and submit to your religious authority, well then, it's ok to walk all over them, discipline them in the name of God, take away their rights and judge them.

The practice of giving names to religious traditions is likewise a modem phenomenon, as Wilfred Cantwell Smith has pointed out, 4 and it derives from the growing awareness of other cultures and civilizations.

If we already presuppose, then, that the theistic religious language employed by the Christian witness in authorizing faith in God's love as our authentic self - understanding can be metaphysically justified, we can say — as I, in fact, have already been saying — that ultimate reality includes not only the self and others but also the encompassing whole of reality that theists refer to when they use the name «God.»

(All the other WW2 leaders were religious, at least in name.)

You expect others to respect your religious belief, but you refuse to respect his, and even call him names!

lets be real, we make our choices, not a fantasy man / woman, I decide what I want to do and not do, what is true and believable is yourself and my family that is the truth and not a story, repeated everyday every sunday, so can u let me know who your GOD is and then let me know the names of all the other religious GOD's??

The executive order in question, issued by President Clinton and affirmed by President Bush in 2002, states that while religious organizations that receive federal funds can not discriminate against beneficiaries of their programs, they «may retain religious terms in its organization's name, select its board members on a religious basis, and include religious references in its organization's mission statements and other chartering or governing documents.»

The greatest mass murders in history — by far and away — were committed in the name of «banning religious symbols» and other such things.

I think there was a time that many believed their faith drove them to seek justice - abolitionists, civil rights leader, healthcare, etc. but now it just seems many want to isolate themselves from the «others» who won't «turn to Christ» and deny them rights in the name of religious liberty.

The reasons for this preference are partly to be sought in his own personal development (Hindu home, Christian instruction), partly in his primary interest in the intellectual expression of religious experience or, in other words, the philosophical bent of his nature, and, last but not least, in his often voiced conviction that we have to «get behind and beneath all outward churches and religions, and worship the nameless who is above every name.

Writing and speaking theologically and naming the divine seem to me a most dangerous activity, for though we are quick to see the limitations of other religious groups or theologians, we fail to recognize our own limitations.

I think much more needs to be researched on this question, but if she actually perpetuated or failed to alleviate the suffering of others when she had the means to do so, in the name of a twisted view of the religious value of suffering, she is very much in reproach in my opinion.

I once worked with a man named Govert who was a universalist and he believed the Bible was God's Word, but he also believed that the Koran, the Vedas, the Buddhist Sutras and other religious writings were also God's Word.