Sentences with phrase «other respected scientists»

Other respected scientists believe that the scenarios have been overtaken by events.

The e-mails were written by the «A-team» — members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — and raise questions if the work of other respected scientists may have been disregarded or hampered by a climate change orthodoxy (or «climate oligarchy») that does not value, indeed may discourage, informed debate and dissent.

For example, in the 1950s, the head of the American Cancer Society and other respected scientists were already linking smoking and cancer.

Not exact matches

Our team and technology is being recognized across multiple respected channels (Infamous Scientist Bill Nye, Forbes Magazine, Fox Business, Inc, and many others)!

Pope: «We can go on all day quoting and counter-quoting scientists about god, but the reality is that most respected scientists and most smart people think that Christianity is a total fraud, quite apart from any deist or other god beliefs and speculations.»

AE, we can go on all day quoting and counterquoting scientists about god, but the reality is that most respected scientists and most smart people think that Christianity is a total fraud, quite apart from any deist or other god beliefs and speculations.

Theologians and scientists who do not wish to go this far have proposed two other models: a «separation» model of mutual respect between science and religion and a «dialogue and engagement» approach that says comparing the two fields is valid.

If there was, than real scientists would be refining and honing that method and religionists would not need to manipulate others into belief with promises of salvation, threats of hell, and tsk - tsking of those who don't show respect for the insanity.

Nobody is suggesting that you must believe in them and scientists would be disappointed if you did with the current knowledge because that would show a lack of respect for other, equally valid theoretical possibilities.

Since the election, AAAS and many other scientific organizations have called on the incoming administration to take heed of established scientific understanding and consult respected scientists.

The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well - respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.

The first tier contains items that many young scientists would expect from their supervisors: mentoring; communication; setting a direction and vision for the research group; providing opportunities to network with other scientists; providing funding for postdocs» research or giving them significant help in obtaining their own grants; training; creating a work culture and environment that encourages individuals to treat everybody with respect and encourages collaboration; creating an ambience that keeps group members satisfied and attracts talented scientists to the group; and offering postdocs opportunities to explore options for their careers once their fellowships have ended.

So it is time for scientists to respect history as a science and for historians to test their historical hypotheses by the comparative method and other techniques.

«Not only do we hire scientists who will treat patients with respect, we also expect them to respect each other,» asserts Chinn.

As the bar is crushed or bent, these magnetic domains shift positions with respect to each other and scientists can detect the associated changes in the bar's magnetic field.

In Bollen's system, scientists no longer have to apply; instead, they all receive an equal share of the funding budget annually — some $ 30,000 in the Netherlands, and $ 100,000 in the United States — but they have to donate a fixed percentage to other scientists whose work they respect and find important.

But the new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, who prepared for the inevitable skepticism with detailed analyses of the orbits of other distant objects and months of computer simulations.

Although many respected scientists have developed theories proposing that there are universes other than our own, nobody knows if they actually exist.

Of all the issues that were laid before me in this competition, I could not help but feel that by supporting this group of scientists and activists in their fight for the planet, we would also be promoting the ideas that knowledge / literacy is power — that other species should be treated with respect — that everyone deserves the basic rights of food, safety and equality — that despite our differences, our common ground is the planet we live on — and that unless we make a serious commitment to protect it, the problems of the future will be too big for any organization to tackle.

UNDESERVED RESPECT My title, The God Delusion, does not refer to the God of Einstein and the other enlightened scientists of the previous section.

Franklin, Jefferson, and other of our nations» founders weren't just statesmen; they were also respected scientists.

It has been my experience that Steve B and some other critics of this blog who post here tend to show respect for those scientists with whom they agree, but are known do get a little, I would say, disrespectful of some of those with which they do not.

What you missed is that other even more respected scientists criticized Mann's early work too.

My trouble with the current state of academia is why after society protects large swaths of academics with tenure, a socially - respected career path, generous salary, tuition benefits for children, comprehensive medical coverage, amongst other perks, why after all that have so few academic scientists stood up to ask the awkward questions.

The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well - respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.

So, what exactly is the problem with respect to Ken, or any other working scientist who choses to come here?

The other three are also well - respected by most scientists, though there might be differences as to what conclusions can be drawn.

As a Fellow of the Geological Society of America (GSA), I periodically blog on their open forum and on their Climate Community website and among other things, I have been accused of «being on the payroll of the Koch brothers,» and when posting a link to Svensmark's video on clouds accused of doing science by u-tube,» and a few other choice things from so - called respected «scientists.»

This question is designed to expose that those politicians who refuse to reduce their government's ghg on the basis that they are not scientists can not ethically justify non-action on climate change on this basis because once they are put on notice by respected scientific organizations that ghg from their government jurisdiction are harming others, they have a duty to prevent dangerous behavior or establish credible scientific evidence that the alleged dangerous behavior is safe.

Many of the promoters of this are (IMO) men who felt they never got the respect they were due from other scientists, who they were sure they were smarter than.

They worked to maintain a symbiotic relationship with leading scientists, each side seeking respect and understanding even as they openly used the other for their purposes.

Edit 2: I completely believe in human caused climate change and I greatly respect the work that Kerry is doing along with many other climate scientists.

In particular: i) the emphasis on reconstructions of historical temperature records; ii) the over-sensitivity of climate models; iii) the exaggeration of positive feedback mechanisms and the opposite with respect to negative feedbacks; iv) the over-statement of second and Nth - order effects of warming on natural processes and society as «impacts»; v) the IPCC reports are not written exclusively by scientists, but in the case of WGII and WGIII especially, are, as has been discovered — by sceptics — written by academics from other disciplines, often without any remarkable expertise, and by activists, with particular agendas.

I completely agree, and have said so on this blog, that Judith has to tread softly because she is a respected climate scientist, and is still trying to reach out to those other scientists who have been caught up in the paradigm paralysis she speaks of.

With all due respect, someone who publicly calls a leading scientist «close minded» and «non-scientist», among numerous other outrageous and unsubstantiated accusations, has some nerve in describing Neven's very gentle, very respectful criticism «personalizing» the issue.

For one thing, the work of a number of respected scientists suggests that the drop in oceanic pH will not be nearly as great as the IPCC and others predict.