Sentences with phrase «other respondents in the case»

I'll close this post with the view of Fran Ellers, a parent of two children in the Jefferson County Public School System (the other respondent in the case along with the Seattle school system).

Callahan represented himself and the other respondents in the case.

Not exact matches

Ecklund said there were cases in which survey respondents identified that not only did they introduce their children to one church, but they also attended other religious services in the hope that the children would better understand each denomination.

Where the numbers in each case don't add up to 100 per cent, it is because the respondents went for other parties or were unsure.

In Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Mubarak v Mubarak [2001] 1 FLR 698, [2000] All ER (D) 2302 the first post-Human Rights Act 1998 case on this jurisdiction (and see «Enforcement matters», David Burrows, 159 NLJ 7368, p 653), Brooke LJ emphasised the importance that the respondent, who faces what amounts to a criminal charge (see Engel and Others v The Netherlands (No 1)(1979) 1 EHRR 647), should know the case against him or her (ie McFarlane LJ's list: (a) and (b)-RRB-: «In Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenIn Newman v Modern Bookbinders Ltd [2000] 2 All ER 814, [2000] 1 WLR 2559 judgment was given in [a case which is] far removed from the presenin [a case which is] far removed from the present.

Lawyer - clients come up frequently with institutional clients where in - house counsel is the client contact and in legal ethics cases where lawyers are respondents or defendants; they can also be the client in any other matter where an individual is the client, as lawyers do have lives too.

Given the arbitrator's findings about the Respondent's conduct, it is not surprising that in this case both the arbitrator and the judge were willing to read s. 59 widely so as to include funding costs as «other costs» and reject the Respondent's argument for a narrow definition.

The Respondent will then begin his or her case in the same order of Direct Examination, Cross Examination by the other party, and then Redirect Examination by the Respondent.

The project culminates in a Constitutional Law Moot Court Competition where two students from each classroom are chosen to argue as the «Petitioner» and the other as the «Respondent» in a mock United States Supreme Court case.

The response to the notice of arbitration may also include: (a) Any plea that an arbitral tribunal to be constituted under these Rules lacks jurisdiction; (b) A proposal for the appointment of a sole arbitrator referred to in article 8, paragraph 1; (c) Notification of the designation of an arbitrator referred to in articles 9 or 10; (d) A brief description of counterclaims or claims for the purpose of a set - off, if any, including where relevant, an indication of the amounts involved, and the relief or remedy sought; (e) A notice of arbitration in accordance with article 3 in case the respondent formulates a claim against a party to the arbitration agreement other than the claimant.

in any other case (including in particular a case where the respondents withdraw opposition to the appeal during the hearing) if the Court so directs or allows.

Many other survey respondents flagged that pro bono clients can be just as demanding as those who are paying for legal services, and in some cases more so.

In so far as reliance placed by the learned senior counsel for the respondent in case of Kanoria and others vs. Guinness reported in (2006) 1 Llyod's Law Reports 701 in support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign awarIn so far as reliance placed by the learned senior counsel for the respondent in case of Kanoria and others vs. Guinness reported in (2006) 1 Llyod's Law Reports 701 in support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign awarin case of Kanoria and others vs. Guinness reported in (2006) 1 Llyod's Law Reports 701 in support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign awarin (2006) 1 Llyod's Law Reports 701 in support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign awarin support of the submission that though petition under section 34 challenging a foreign award in India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign awarin India had failed, English Court of Appeal had refused to enforce foreign award on the ground that aggrieved party who was not given due notice of plea of fraud and was unable to represent its case is concerned, a perusal of the judgment indicates that the Court of Appeal had rendered a finding that the aggrieved party who was unable to represent its case and had refused to enforce the foreign award.

For 26.7 % of the children, someone other than the biological mother was interviewed when the child was 6 years old; in most of these cases, the respondent was another relative (eg, grandmother or aunt), although some respondents were nonrelative foster parents.

Unlike many other jurisdictions, in Arizona a Summons is required in all cases, whether or not Respondent accepts service from Petitioner.

Amabile concluded in the report that Z.B.D. was exhibiting signs of alienation from D.T. Amabile explained that alienation is the programming of a child by the alienating parent, in this case respondent, to believe that one parent is good and the other parent is bad with the goal that the child completely reject the other parent.»

(b) A person shall automatically be disqualified as a member of a tribunal in any case in which the person is (1) related by blood or marriage to either complainant or respondent; (2) an employer, partner, employee, or in any way associated in business with either complainant or respondent; (3) a party to the hearing, or a party or a witness in any other pending case involving a party to this hearing; or (4) is objected to by a party as provided in Part Seven, Section 27 (f).

In cases where one of the listing brokers has been compensated by the seller or landlord, the other listing broker, as complainant, may name the first listing broker as respondent and arbitration may proceed between the brokers.