Diet books use
other ridiculous claims like «eating junk food makes it harder to eat muscle,» or «eating red meat damages your heart and blood muscles,» or «saturated fat clogs your arteries,» or a more popular one recently, «grains give you cancer, headaches, and cause pretty much every other health problem.»
How do you rationalize this (and all
the other ridiculous claims in the holy book) away?
Not exact matches
Notice how I neither pass judgement one way or the
other and believe that the
claims went from
ridiculous and not worth my time of serious investigation to still be
ridiculous but at least worth a further amout of investigation.
Trying to discuss anything with Topher
other than you believe in creationism and the
ridiculous claims that entails is futile.
The guys jewish so no help from the pope, cant be helping
other religions might look bad in the eyes of what ever
ridiculous gods they
claim to pray too.
On the
other hand, it's completely
ridiculous to
claim that boys are criticized if they beat girls.
Yes, it's
ridiculous to
claim «the
other side of the shoe is clean.»
To be honest the stories were getting
ridiculous, with so - called experts
claiming the deal was done and that private jets had been booked to bring him from Madrid and
other such malarkey.
Again, I applaud YouTube and Google for suspending sixpackshortcuts account and I hope this will be a wake up call to
other people who use
ridiculous claims to sell their expensive eBooks, website subscriptions, and newsletters.
So many
others muddle the picture and make
claims that come off either
ridiculous or reactionary or both.
In this case I had an strange interaction with Trevor Davies afterwards about his
ridiculous claim to Steve in person in July, in front of
others in the wine bar after the Guardian debate, of a significant error he'd found on Climate Audit.
Now you don't see that one being publicized by the NYT or CNN or BBC or any
other mainstream media, yet just today on yahoo I see another
ridiculous report on yahoo
claiming «if research is correct about 6 foot sea - level rise by the end of the century..
I've heard some of the most
ridiculous claims by climate change advocates about how we're all going to be dead in a decade or two, how we'll see the oceans rise to cover almost all the land masses and
other extreme nonsense.
The writer argues in his letter that (i) the evidence does not support the conclusion that there is systemic racism in the legal professions, (ii) the
claim of systemic racism vilifies lawyers and paralegals by labelling them as racist, (iii) the 13 recommendations are a form of unauthorized social engineering, (iv) racism and bullying are just part of life and should be simply be endured and overcome by racialized licensees as
others have done before them, (v) the true problem is economic class not race, (vi) white privilege is a
ridiculous concept as it relates to white and racialized lawyers and (vii) racialized lawyers who join legal associations based on race or ethnic origin can not complain that they are not treated equally.
One
other feature they both share (apart from the software) is the Nexus Imprint fingerprint recognition technology which Google
claims can accurately recognize fingerprints at
ridiculous speeds, and will keep getting better the more you use it.
While user clogger says they will be returning their 5T and user whatthefunk calls it a
ridiculous issue,
others, such as MentalDraco, don't seem to be that bothered,
claiming that OnePlus explained this in an AMA.