Even before the Higgs was discovered, Krauss was wondering if
other scalar fields could couple to the Higgs field, offering links to new physical phenomena.
Even before the Higgs was discovered, physicist Lawrence Krauss of Arizona State University in Tempe was wondering if
other scalar fields existed that could interact with the Higgs field.
Not exact matches
Unlike
other fields in the standard model, the Higgs field is
scalar — it does not act in a specific direction.
The Standard Model has 40 species of elementary particles (24 fermions, 12 vector bosons, and 4
scalars), which can combine to form composite particles, accounting for the hundreds of
other species of particles discovered since the 1960s.
Discovered last year, the Higgs boson also comes with an associated field but, unlike
others of its class, the Higgs field is
scalar — it does not act in a specific direction.
I should point out that there are
other explanations for
scalar fields as well, but string theory does seem to give those naturally to you.
But once we compute the
scalar implicatures, we realize that «Jane ate cake or ice cream» is a «strengthened» way of saying she ate one or the
other, but not both.
And of course, any
scalar metric of model adequacy is incomplete at best and can lead to situations like the one you describe with the IPSL models, where a model may seem marginally worse by one
scalar metric but is better by several
other metrics.