However, a significant portion of people also reported painful experiences associated with listening to sad music, which invariably related to personal loss such as the death of a loved one, divorce, breakup, or
other significant adversity in life.
Not exact matches
There is a
significant variation in the way individuals react and respond to extreme stress and
adversity — some individuals develop psychiatric conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder or major depressive disorder —
others recover from stressful experiences without displaying
significant symptoms of psychological ill - health, demonstrating stress - resilience.
A growing body of empirical evidence indicates that
significant adversity during childhood (e.g., from abuse or neglect, exposure to violence, deep and persistent poverty, and / or the cumulative burdens of racial or ethnic discrimination) can contribute to lifelong problems in learning, behavior, and chronic health impairments such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes cancer, and depression, among many
others.
Science tells us that some children develop resilience, or the ability to overcome
significant adversity, while
others do not.
Membership in a single - parent family or stepfamily is associated with increased levels of
significant behavioral, emotional, and academic problems in children.1, 2 The mechanisms underlying this connection are likely to involve, among
other factors, financial
adversity, increased stress directly related to family transitions, and increased exposure to additional psychosocial risks.3, 4 Compared with the extensive research base connecting family type (ie, membership in a 2 - parent biological family, stepfamily, or single - parent family) and children's psychological adjustment, little is known about the physical health consequences of membership in diverse family types.
There are
other possible explanations why we did not find a
significant relationship between different levels of
adversity compared with no
adversity.
Protective experiences and adaptive skills on one side counterbalance
significant adversity on the
other.
One final example is the prefrontal cortex, which is thought to play an important role in regulating behavior by suppressing impulses and emotions arising from the amygdala and
other parts of the limbic system.50 — 52 In animal studies, exposure to chronic stress or glucocorticoids alters the synaptic connectivity within the prefrontal cortex, 52,53 and this may limit the ability of the prefrontal cortex to (1) suppress the impulsivity and aggression of the limbic system, and (2) execute adaptive responses (rather than maladaptive responses) to stress.54 — 56 Stress - induced changes in brain structure parallel the well - described impact of
significant childhood
adversity on a variety of brain functions, including the modulation of physiologic responses (hyper - responsive or chronically active stress response), learning (impaired memory), and the regulation of behavior (the ability to execute adaptive vs maladaptive responses to stress).3, 39,57
Of the
adversities implicated, sexual and physical abuse were more
significant risk factors than
other adversities, highlighting the fact that intrusive and aggressive experiences in childhood may have more devastating and longer lasting effects.58 This may be due to the extreme powerlessness and loss of control that such abuse causes, or to physically aggressive assaults resulting in the devaluation of one's body and consequent susceptibility to self - harm.28 In a country with high rates of sexual and physical abuse, 46 this is a matter of particular concern.
The results showed that each individual
adversity factor had a statistically
significant association with one or more of the child health and health behaviour outcomes, even after controlling for the effect of
other family
adversity measures.