Sentences with phrase «other skeptic blogs»

A cursory review of this blog and other skeptic blogs easily show routine and frequent comment threads and posts yucking it up about «global cooling».

There has been an explosion of the term «circle the wagons» over the past few dozen hours, here, on other skeptic blogs and even at Real Climate.

Not exact matches

Not only NASA, but others including some of the more intelligent skeptics that inhabit lucia's blog, «The Blackboard».

Similarly, I suspect that people on this blog would find things to say about the qualifications of skeptic posts here or on other blogs.

The hacker proceeded to comment on other, lesser - known climate change skeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate Sskeptic blogs including the Air Vent (run by Patrick Condon), as well as on a blog titled Climate SkepticSkeptic.

Watts is the editor and primary contributor to the blog, while other authors have included climate change skeptics such as Roger Pielke Senior and Pielke Jr..

On other blogs, one way to identify the climate skeptics is that they're the ones who talk in that dismissively pseudoscientific way.

Lower - case mike is basically a first - class liar, no different that all the other lying fake skeptics that infest this blog's comments section.

Today I offer this post as a «Summary for Policymakers» regarding my series of seven prior blog posts about a smear effort which took place back in 2007 that is a case study for examining other prior and current industry corruption accusations against skeptic climate scientists.

I hear comments like this all the time on Skeptic Science and other warmist blogs.

The skeptical blog Jammie Wearing Fools wrote, «Fifteen years, no warming, yet we've endured nonstop hysteria in that time, with skeptics derisively called deniers, among other pejoratives.

For me, as with countless other skeptics, my engagement in the climate discussion started with me reading a blog written by a Canadian statistician with the temerity to challenge the orthodoxy and state, «YOU»RE DOING IT WRONG!!!

Back in the early spring of 2007, believers of catastrophic man - caused global warming were no doubt quite happy with Al Gore's «An Inconvenient Truth» movie, Ross Gelbspan's books, prominent pro-global warming blogs, mainstream media outlets, and others who gave essentially no fair play to the presentation of detailed climate assessments from skeptic climate scientists.

I concluded my last blog piece by suggesting there might be three degrees or less separation between Ross Gelbspan and others who say skeptic climate scientists are corrupt.

As a commenter on another skeptic blog has observed: «the mere fact of the raid is «intimidating» (potentially) to many... Some are braver or better situated than others to handle police scrutiny but NO ONE should have to face police raids merely for having a blog.»

Despite the oft» made assertion, not only do I have no interest in «diverting» you or anyone else, it is abundantly clear that nothing that I could write in blog comments could «divert» you or any other «skeptic» from focusing on whatever the frick you want to focus on anyway.

But, from what I've read on this blog and others, there seems to be almost zero «skeptics» who having jumped to wild conclusions early on, have then had the decency to say «oops, might have been a bit hasty there — sorry, got it wrong».

The klan moniker is appropriate for these blog skeptics because klan members ALWAYS condone other klan members behavior.

Global warming «skeptics» — scientists and others who question whether the scientific debate is truly settled and ask for real data to support the claims of the alarmists — are frequently attacked in the press, by politicians (including President Barack Obama), and on countless blogs and Web sites.

Witness what is done here and at other «skeptics» blogs.

Not that this post has anything to do with the various ad hominems tossed at the skeptics, but it seems that comparing climate skepticism to other forms of anti-science cranks and medical quacks seems to be the [not so subtle] M.O. of one blog over at Science Blogs [even if they don't go out of their way to actually make that comparison, having it on their list is enough to give one that impression]: http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/