Sentences with phrase «other skeptic sites»
No sign of this site or any other skeptic site.
https://climateaudit.org/ Not exact matches
Founded in 2000, the Secular Student Alliance represents «atheists, agnostics, humanists, freethinkers, skeptics, naturalists, brights, Pastafarians, and many others,» according the the group's web site.
I did get convinced of various things because of other skeptics online so I had big hopes for this site.
As a member of the non-scientific «skeptic» camp (but not a denialist), I find this particular topic and most other topics introduced on this site to be extremely valuable in forming my thoughts on the entire GW / human impact debate.
But none of the rest of the post apparently, is dedicated to examining what the «other side» to the skeptic side promulgated here on this site, might be.
I am also struck that many of the AGW skeptics on this and other sites do so without monetary compensation.
Yes, they were interesting (and educational) times, before Climategate I didn't think much about the reasons for the great big new taxes but when Climategate occurred I took an interest and since then have become a skeptic or denialist or whatever the current word is Perhaps what Politicisation has done in the name of science is demonstrate that there are inquiring and courageous scientific and other minds that do not close And where's Bulldust (I think he is Australian as I am) and the coiner of the phrase «Climategate» Happy anniversary everyone, thank you Anthony for a wonderful site
And, if you think it's bad here, you might take a day and pose as an advocate for action on climate change on sites like WUWT, JoNova, Curry, or any of the many other lightly or unmoderated «skeptic» sites.
The quality of the site have created a lot of traffic from warmers, skeptics, spaceweather fanatics and many others.
Global warming «skeptics» — scientists and others who question whether the scientific debate is truly settled and ask for real data to support the claims of the alarmists — are frequently attacked in the press, by politicians (including President Barack Obama), and on countless blogs and Web sites.
Some of them, and other prominent skeptics, have taken part in discussion on this site... often at the express invitation of the moderators.
As reported on this site on February 15, the documents revealed, among other facts, that the Heartland Institute, as part of a larger strategy for undermining support for global warming, was supporting prominent skeptics such as physicist Fred Singer and geologist Robert Carter.
There's dozens of threads and hundreds of comments on this site from very well informed skeptics (amongst others) explaining the facts.