Not exact matches
This has been a period in which the categories of the
social sciences have been employed for the study of such ancient literature, alerting us to the ways in which ancient communities are rooted in
social realities, as well as the ways in which
social structures and
ideologies reinforce each
other.
No
other structure in the world can be called on to promise eternal salvation, and when such salvific claims are made in the name of some nation, race,
social class, religion, or
ideology, the church must fight such idolatry and blasphemy with all its means of persuasion, even to the point of martyrdom.
Such misuse of reason, after all, was what gave rise to the slave trade in the first place and to many
other social evils, not least the totalitarian
ideologies of the twentieth century.
The language of
ideology sounds great; it reflects concern for
others and notable religious principles, but it also happens to protect a self - seeking, status - quo theory or
social practice.
One is a lack of belief in gods, the
other is an economic and
social ideology that promotes a classless society based on public ownership of the means of production.
Fundamentalist Hindu opposition to change of the traditional Hindu
social order had played a large part in the creation and strengthening of the RSS
ideology of opposition to
other religions and to movements of Hindu reformation.
Also different is the
social and political status of African and Asian Christians, who are often minorities in countries dominated by
other religions or secular
ideologies.
The influence of Hinduism on the
social and religious life of Adivasis has been considerable, particularly in the last 10 - 15 years... the BJP and
other Hindu organizations such as the Mandir, the Arya Samaj, saints and sadhus, and some Adivasi politicians have succeeded in inculcating the Hindutva RSS, the ABVP, Bajrang Dal, Shiv Shena, the Hindu Milan
ideology in the minds of the Adivasi people?
The real struggle in all religious communities is for spiritual reformation opening themselves to enter into dialogue with
other religions and with secular humanist
ideologies regarding the nature and rights of the human person and the meaning of
social justice enabling to build together a new spiritually - oriented humanism and a more humane society.
They are seeking what has been called post-modern paradigms for «an open secular democratic culture» within the framework of a public philosophy (Walter Lippman) or Civil Religion (Robert Bellah) or a new genuine realistic humanism or at least a body of insights about the nature of being and becoming human, evolved through dialogue among renascent religions, secularist
ideologies including the philosophies of the tragic dimension of existence and disciplines of
social and human sciences which have opened themselves to each
other in the context of their common sense of historical responsibility and common human destiny.
Do symbols really reveal anything
other than our own subjective or
social longings or
ideologies?
Mosse carefully distinguishes German National Socialism» in which a virulent racist
ideology, drawing on
social Darwinism, anti «Semitism, and various nineteenth «century racialist theories, wedded itself to nationalism» from
other forms of fascism that downplayed or shunned racism.
Yet its alienation from
other radical movements, especially black liberation, and its recourse to a kind of «separatist»
ideology — that talks about the oppression of women as more basic than any
other form of oppression in a way that makes women a separate cause unrelated to
other kinds of oppression — may be working its own kind of subtle
social encapsulation.
In a recent book by Dr. Peter Cook (Mothering Denied) describes better than most
others the difficulties that Dr. Jay Belsky has had convincing his fellow scientists that
social ideology is passing for, if not dictating, scientific interpretations of studies on this issue (as is true for the bedsharing debate), in favor of dismissing the serious concerns and negative developmental correlates of infants and children being placed for long hours, early in their lives, in daycare centers.
For right - wing
social conservatives for example, their
ideology will not only define their personal conduct (they are more likely to be religious), but also how they relate to
others and the sort of government they want.
Philip Blonde takes an almost Democratic Republican
ideology towards public service reform in advocating using
social entreprises to manage schools, hospitals, sure start centres etc, which would be democratically connected to all
other schools etc through out the country and collectively elect the central management who allocate budget spending to each and every school etc. http://www.respublica.org.uk/publications/ownership-state It sounds more like a radical libertarian socialist solution to public services than a free market conservative solution to public services.
That, Mr Asiedu Nketia added, would train party comrades in the fundamental principles and
ideologies of the party as well as
other relevant programmes related to politics and
social democracy.
For the record, while the
Social Liberal Forum does indeed believe that social liberalism is the mainstream ideology of the Liberal Democrats, we do not believe it is incompatible with other strands of liber
Social Liberal Forum does indeed believe that
social liberalism is the mainstream ideology of the Liberal Democrats, we do not believe it is incompatible with other strands of liber
social liberalism is the mainstream
ideology of the Liberal Democrats, we do not believe it is incompatible with
other strands of liberalism.
The real division in the Labour party has been between the true «
social democrats» and those who are the children of neoliberal
ideology, the division between Keynes and Beveridge on one side and Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman on the
other.
On the
other hand, complexity makes the difference or the complex plurality, which does not have an horizontal order, the
social - corporative theories tend to fall to the deception of having «organization levels», and unavoidably make the mistake of seeing the world as a plural closed over it - self; typical of the dogmatic
ideologies that in the end just look for a zero confusion level.
«Schools have a very big responsibility to teach their students to think in more sophisticated ways about
social and political controversies, to talk across differences of culture, class, and
ideology and to engage in conversation with
others that might have very different viewpoints,» Bermudez says.
While the recent upsurge of feminist activity in this country has indeed been a liberating one, its force has been chiefly emotional — personal, psychological and subjective — centered, like the
other radical movements to which it is related, on the present and its immediate needs, rather than on historical analysis of the basic intellectual issues which the feminist attack on the status quo automatically raises.1 Like any revolution, however, the feminist one ultimately must come to grips with the intellectual and ideological basis of the various intellectual or scholarly disciplines — history, philosophy, sociology, psychology, etc. — in the same way that it questions the
ideologies of present
social institutions.
Social inequalities and rebellion were marked by way of dress, and once these
ideologies failed, the style faded away as the protagonists changed and reverted to some
other reality.
These and
other works demonstrate the varied ways artists and designers of the period responded to a world transformed by industrialization, city population growth, and shifting
social structures and political
ideologies, forces that spawned both mechanized warfare and new forms of urban leisure.
At times, text and speech are used as ways to engage with popular culture, politics and
social ideologies; at
others, they are abstracted both visually and verbally to explore semiotics and the structure of language.
Instead of individually - minded, «homogenous globules of desire» that act with our own best interests in mind as certain
social darwinists would have it, we're deeply affected by an irrational set of concerns like the opinions of
others and
ideologies.
Theories speculate that regular joint church attendance provides a protective effect for the marriage by providing consistent
social networks of like - minded individuals and strengthens bonds by reinforcing
ideology and lifestyles.27 In addition to religious service attendance, regular in - home worship activities28 and
other joint religious activities, coupled with fewer religious differences, 29 increased marital satisfaction.