They plan to measure
other spectral lines and even test the pull of gravity on antihydrogen — to see if it is pulled down or pushed up.
Not exact matches
Yet so far, star formation historians have mostly relied on
other indicators to write their histories: light at a particular frequency that is typically emitted when giant clouds collapse, heating up in the process and radiating away that heat in the form of specific
spectral lines.
The challenge for astronomers is to identify that fingerprint among the forest of
spectral lines from all the
other chemicals in the cloud.
Infrared light, on the
other hand, traces dust in a galaxy, and emission
lines that are detected in
spectral lines trace the gas clouds.
GHGs are special because they have
lines within the IR bands that fit into the remaining
spectral «windows»; but then why are those windows important, when the non-windows have been closed exactly by absorption by
other gases?
Just as these narrow
spectral lines do not (generally) overlap those of another species, nor do they OVERLAP EACH
OTHER!!
The Wikipedia article you pointed to is about
spectral lines, and at
other points in the article they note that «
spectral lines» applies to both absorption and emission.
On the
other hand, once water is present, its IR
spectral lines overlap with those of CO2 and make CO2 less potent a greenhouse gas — for the same reason why the temperature dependence on CO2 concentration becomes logarithmic: the previous molecules have already done much of the effect, anyway.
I also understand to about the same extent, how those
spectral lines can have a «fine structure» producing several
lines instead of one; due to refinements first proposed by Arnold Sommerfeld and
others.
Neonflames invites you to draw
spectral shapes and
lines, modifying colours, intensities, «noise,» fuzz, and
other mysterious things.