Sentences with phrase «other systems of thought»

The opening chapter Portals looks at how spiritualism is often concerned with entrances into other worlds or other systems of thought.
Eschatology — the theology of end times — is a religious concept, but crops up in many other systems of thought.
These theses of the socially powerless Jesus, the compromise of the gospel ethic with world and other systems of thought, the centrality of the love commandments, the need for a viable social ethic utilizing social philosophies, and the understanding by all this in relationship to the history of social philosophies had a forceful impact upon both H. Richard Niebuhr and his older brother Reinhold Niebuhr.

Not exact matches

Some researchers also think it may be possible to compare the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and other chemicals in a plume to «default» levels seen in asteroids, which were formed at the dawn of the solar system — and ask if life is manipulating the chemistry there, or at least did so in the past.
CF: I think it's important that others step up to the plate, and that we have good, ongoing thinking and generation of evidence and ideas to constantly replenish our health care system.
Robert Cihra, another industry analyst, thinks Kindle Fire could «vaporize» other tablets running the Android operating system, and comprise 50 % of Android tablet sales this year.
It did, however, make some decisions in favor of usability that some security experts thought compromised the system to a few kinds of attack that other researchers believed were unlikely.
Since Help Scout is a help desk, it would be foolish to claim that I'm approaching this without a slight brush of bias, but I promise you my stance comes from experience; specifically, seeing new founders suggest to other new founders why they think a convoluted system of Gmail filters is «okay for now.»
When you play at our level you have to start thinking about the Internet of things and embedded systems and all that other stuff.
A: I think I was like 99.9 percent of other Americans, and I was absolutely naïve about how controlled our food system is by the [food] packer and producer cartels.
While other industries often speak of being «customer centric» or «putting the customer first,» the U.S. healthcare system rarely thinks of the patient as a customer.
When asked if it would like to see other sites adopt a policy feedback system, Schnitt said «Absolutely, we think users should demand this kind of thing, and they deserve it too.»
Think Google (Alphabet), Intuit, Netflix, eBay, Tesla Motors, Cisco Systems and others — many of which we've owned at one point or another in our two domestic equity funds, the All American Equity Fund (GBTFX) and Holmes Macro Trends Fund (MEGAX).
Loyola keeping a Catholic identity helps promote real intellectual diversity in American public life (and, again, I'd say the same as to other religious universities; I can imagine some religious belief systems that are so pernicious that, while they must be constitutionally protected, we can still say they hurt American life more than they help it, but I think that most of the traditions that found universities do have a good deal to contribute).
This means, to return to iron, if you understood China as a growth «system», with its own logic, its liquidity channels, its institutional distortions, its balance sheets that embedded pro-cyclical or counter-cyclical tendencies, etc. you would have known that once the process started, rebalancing was going to cause iron ore prices (and prices of other hard commodities) to collapse, and I stressed, as I often do, that I did not think the word «collapse» was overly dramatic.
A lot of merchants are paying to the tune of up to 4 % just be able to accept traditional plastic at the point - of - sale systems, and I think if you look at a lot of the other mechanisms that could facilitate that asset exchange, as Roger said, you could do that with a lot of cryptocurrencies exponentially quicker and cheaper.
Anthony: I think it's important to note that this whole thing started about a decade ago with a white paper about a peer - to - peer, digital cash payment system, but over the past decade, people have realized that this underlying technology has a ton of applications, not just in financial services and payments, but in other industries such as health care, supply chain and so on.
Lead analytics expert technical consultant teams in delivering project implementations and configurations Strategist for Client Implementations of Adobe Marketing Cloud Products (AEM, Analytics, Target, Social, Campaign, etc.) Participate and lead internal brainstorming and creative thinking sessions that solve client / prospect digital marketing roadblocks, customer roadmap & journey strategies, technical integrations, and discover upsell opportunities Leverage digital marketing consulting skills to assess client's requirements in aligning proper resources and provide on - time delivery of the scope of work Key strategic member of sales and business development teams by providing expert solutions to prospects leading to purchasing content management systems such as Adobe AEM (CMS & Communities), Target, Campaign, Analytics and other digital marketing technologies and services Collaborate with all business units including: consulting, technical, sales, and marketing Developed acquisition & demand generation strategies via event, email and content marketing programs Establish excellent sales and client retention strategies and demand generation by providing guidance through evaluation of current technologies and sourcing of complementary products and services to recommend Created sales strategy to increase sales pipeline and focus on opportunities in both inbound and outbound marketing Co-Sell, Cross-Sell, Upsell & Strategize with Partners.
I mean given that the fractional reserve banking system is so over-levered, globally, but just thinking about the U.S. for a minute if everybody put 5 % -10 % of their money in Bitcoin or some other cryptocurrencies, the whole banking system implodes on itself.
Put simply, mining can be thought of as a process of putting your computer systems and graphics cards to use for processing dogecoin transactions made by other people.
With all the deaths that occured in the name of christianity et al, the other system is less bloody, dońt you think?
I think of it as something like emergent behavior in other dynamic systems.
The victory of the post-European techno - secular world and the universalization of its lifestyle and thinking have spread the impression (especially in Asia and Africa) that Europe's value system, culture, and faith — in other words, the very foundations of its identity — have reached the end of the road and have indeed already disappeared.
It may be that when one develops a system of thought and life around some set of such patterns it turns out to be quite different from the system developed elsewhere around other patterns.
---------- Let's think about this, go back to my post and you will see that I said there are other dating systems other than the 6000 year dating system of Bishop Usser:...... «Without a doubt Bishop Usser's dating system is very wrong.
As traditional theology was a relatively well defined system, the same in certain basic respects — despite all sorts of philosophical and ecclesiastical differences — in Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Maimonides, Leibniz, Calvin, Immanuel Kant, and some schools of Hindu thought, so the new theology which many be contrasted with the old is found more or less fully and consistently represented in thinkers as far apart as William James,... Henri Bergson, F. R. Tennant,... A. N. Whitehead,... Nicholas Berdyaev,... and in numerous others of every brand of Protestantism, besides a few... Roman Catholics.
Finally, although the spiritual awareness other thought increased, particularly in her latter years, the centrality of spiritual - value issues in all human growth was not emphasized explicitly in her therapeutic system.
In an essay on «The Theology of Religion» (I.T.C. Journal, I / 1, 1974), I have argued that a theologian can have his life and thought enriched by this experience precisely because he views the faith of other persons from within his own system of belief and thought.
The primary answer is that modernist thinking assumes the validity of Darwinian evolution, which explains the origin of humans and other living systems by an entirely mechanistic process that excludes in principle any role for a Creator.
On the other hand, evidentialists are right to assert that between Christian and anti «Christian systems of thought there is always a point of contact.
Looking back on that experience I honestly don't think it was a spiritual event any more than many other events are (though I believe all events have a spiritual counterpart just as there are different physical levels of the universe way can overlay on any given system)
If you are convinced that your particular religion or belief system is superior to others and people need to be converted to your particular way of thinking, then you are not part of a religion, but are part of a cult.
The claim of Christian belief is not first and foremost that it offers the only accurate system of thought, as against all other competitors; it is that, by standing in the place of Christ, it is possible to live in such intimacy with God that no fear or failure can ever break God's commitment to us, and to live in such a degree of mutual gift and understanding that no human conflict or division need bring us to uncontrollable violence and mutual damage.
Parents with economic means do everything they can to make sure their children succeed, and rightfully so, but they often do so while giving little or no thought to the consequences of their actions for other children in the system.
I think, for instance, of Chuck Colson, who did more than any other man in the last probably 100 years in American life in calling the Church to remember prisoners and to think about implications of the justice system.
But, quite apart from the fact that many anthropologists — for instance, Jevons and Frazer — expressly oppose «religion» and «magic» to each other, it is certain that the whole system of thought which leads to magic, fetishism, and the lower superstitions may just as well be called primitive science as called primitive religion.
Douglas Farrow's theses both reflect and presuppose a comprehensive system of thought: a philosophy in which all values are rank - ordered and fit seamlessly together, producing a worldview in which each aspect reinforces all others and that is finally at least largely impervious to empirical challenge.
The conjunction of a false proposition with other propositions into a «system,» «thought «form,» or «language» does not remedy the falsehood of that proposition.
Every single one of them thinks they've found a profound lifestyle, system, or behavior that can change others lives for the better, and all of them are guilty of hubris, as they actually have no secret information at all.
The deeper point of the critics of process thought is that subsuming other creatures into the ethical system worked out in modernity to guide relations among people does not change us at the needed level.
Either one accepts the basic Western ethical system of respecting other human beings as subjects and extends that respect to other creatures that are also recognized as subjects, or one asks much more fundamental questions about the assumptions of Western thought, rejects ethical thinking of this sort altogether, and develops a new sensibility more like the one Shepard finds among primal peoples.
Other times, they may be aware their behavior is wrong (although they are less likely to see it as abusive) and simply think they have to act that way to remain part of the dysfunctional system they are in.
For Piaget, as for his predecessors, the living organism was the prototype of a holistic structure and the connecting link between, on the one hand, physical - chemical systems and, on the other hand, the thinking subject (S 40).
... if Man organizes himself gradually on a global scale in a sort of closed circuit, within which each thinking element is intellectually and affectively connected with every other, he will attain to a maximum of individual mastery by participating in a certain ultimate clarity of vision and extreme warmth of sympathy proper to the system as a whole.
The difference, from the Whiteheadian point of view, is that whereas these deep ecologists think we must choose between an ethical - valuational approach to other creatures and an appreciation of our unity with the whole system of nature, Whitehead shows us the truth of both.
It is a system where the elite rule, the ideology you are looking for is Theocracy which is one of the few politicesed religious ruling systems that realy reaaly goes big on the whole «supressing» other ideas / thoughts part, it comes from always beling you are right.
CC: I think in a full - bodied system one would want both a relation of overlap or extending over and probably also a relation of resonance or recapitulation between durations which did not extend over each other.
It also appears that humanity is not able to control our thought processes to any great degree, and erratic thinking can have a great many different causes and effects... and the various biochemical actions / reactions of our central nervous systems are not exactly «set in stone», so when you have a situation like this one, it is only good sense to call for rationality in what we do and in what others do.
So in her conclusion she highlights some of the accomplishments of Byzantine civilization: an imperial government built on a trained civilian administration and tax system; a legal structure based on Roman law; a curriculum of secular education that preserved classical learning; theological thought, artistic expression, and spiritual traditions that are still alive in the Orthodox churches; and coronation and court rituals that were adopted by other rulers.
I thought the characters were flat and unattractive, the story ho - hum, and the premise churlish and clumsy (i.e. the whole point is to tear down the belief system of others rather than put something positive forward as an alternative).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z