Unfortunately, by then, most budget decisions had already been made and the chances that the Committee's recommendations (
other than Liberal election promises) would have any impact on the Budget were virtually non-existent.
Not exact matches
Organizers estimated that more
than 10,000 people packed Boston's Copley Square to hear Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, a vocal critic of Trump and a leader of the Democratic Party's
liberal wing, and
other speakers.
Others in the business think the secret to greater acceptance lies in building a distribution network and courting
liberal - minded builders rather
than targeting home buyers.
«I don't think you can go any more
liberal —
other than giving the inmates the keys.»
Second, Arthur Meighen's Tories «won» the 1925 general election in the sense that they took more seats
than any
other party, 116 compared to 99 for King's
Liberals.
Not because the BC
Liberals won — political opponents have to accept that some times the
other team had a superior campaign
than your own, more ideas, a more effective leader or just did a better job.
The parliamentary secretary to the minister of justice says the
Liberal government has no plans currently to legalize or decriminalize «any
other drug»
than cannabis.
Fitting NAFTA into that aspirational, elevated, internationalist, decidedly un-Trumpian frame conforms better with the self - image of
Liberals, and many
other Canadians,
than the more familiar positioning of free trade as a priority of corporate lobbyists.
Tuition has doubled since the B.C.
Liberals came into power, more
than any
other province.
When Alberta's Legislative Assembly reconvenes in the next few months, for the first time since 1982 the title of Official Opposition will given to a caucus of MLA's representing a party
other than the New Democrats or the
Liberals.
The carbon tax has remained at $ 30 / t since 2012 and the previous
Liberal government showed no inclination to increase it further
other than to match the federal carbon price floor in 2021.
Do you or Obama, or any
other liberal, know more or better
than God?
Theological liberalism has split one church after another — to the point that the theologically
liberal in different churches often have more in common with each
other than with the more orthodox in their own churches.
and he probably identifys with a
liberal christian tradition more
than any
other.
It matters not whether we be conservative or
liberal, traditionalist or modernist; in whatever category we may be placed, or place ourselves, the fact remains that insofar as we are Christian ministers, ordained by Christ in his Church to be his ministering agents, our preaching can be nothing
other than the proclamation of God's Word for the wholeness of men.
Oh, and Rush is a loud mouth who only sometimes gets it right, and that's more of an admission
than you'd ever get from a
liberal about their Bill Maher, Chris Matthews, or
other liberal blowhard.
Nobody
other than Jesus hated religion more
than Paul, once a conservative fundamentalist who became the most
liberal author in known history.
But
liberals wanted to emphasize meeting the recognized needs of
other people rather
than converting them to Christianity.
Even if all parties were to agree that American republicanism is not classically
liberal, or that classical liberalism really is ontologically indifferent, or that the laws of nature and of nature's God are the foundation of constitutional order and that these are the same thing as natural law — even if, in
other words, all parties were to agree to some version of a pristine American founding harmonious in principle with the truth of God and the human being — returning to the first principles of the eighteenth century isn't much more realistic
than a return to the first principles of the thirteenth.
I guess I feel the same way about a
liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil
than any
other nation on the planet.
There are many Christian
liberal Democrats; the difference is that we do not boast to be «holier
than thou» Christians in order to influence
others to vote Democrat.
If, on the
other hand, being Christian continues to mean little more
than being predictable middle - class
liberals with a tinge of something called spirituality, then the few exceptional things that congregations occasionally manage to perform ethically will lack any foundation in repentance and faith.
The Murjites — literally those who postpone; here, those who postpone judgment until it is pronounced by God on the Day of Judgment — were more tolerant
than the
others in their political views and more
liberal - minded on theological questions.
Others among the Sufis held fast to shari`a, but understood it in ways which were much wider and more
liberal than the interpretation of the orthodox, looking upon the law as either a system of self - discipline or as a set of symbols representing hidden religious meanings.
The fourth is seldom noticed, and yet in some ways is closer to the essence of
liberal studies
than the
other three, and on that account is particularly worthy of emphasis.
But evangelicals are included in the «
others»; no less
than liberals they seek to understand Scripture according to the particular historical contexts in which biblical texts were written ¯ with the one difference being that they consider themselves bound to receive what they conclude the text to say as authoritative rather
than open to improvement.
The primary factors which bear on the question seem to me to be five: (1) the churchgoing habit in these churches is earlier and more persistently associated with religion; (2) the emotional accompaniments of worship are more vivid and dramatic; (3) greater demands — or at least, greater consciously recognized demands — are made on church members; (4) more concrete instruction is given in Christian doctrine; and (5) in spite of some false notes,
other notes are struck which in certain great essentials lie closer to the heart of the Christian gospel
than the usual
liberal emphasis.
Whether the laity in prevailingly
liberal churches can be shown to have more sensitive consciences
than others and a greater sense of compulsion in serving their fellow men, I do not know.
In the first lecture I explained why, for
liberal and progressive Protestants the question of whether we should turn to someone
other than Jesus is a serious, even critical, one.
It may not be out of order here to make some comparisons as to the effectiveness in this field of three dominant types of American church life the Roman Catholic, the fundamentalist Protestant, and the
liberal — mainly with a view to seeing what can be learned from types
other than our own.
Perhaps it may be right to say, that in general the politically conscious educated middle class of India were guided more by the
Liberal and Marxian ideologies
than the Gandhian or
other versions of reformed Hindu thought.
The baby killing, sodomizing, thieving
liberals on here obviously do not understand anything
other than killing, sodomy and stealing.
In response to our reader's objection, Mr. Solomon writes: «While I would not wish to oversimplify the case, and though I recognize that there are many
liberal Catholic thinkers who are tolerant on this subject, the Catholic Church as an institution remains singularly and aggressively antagonistic on the subject of euthanasia, and does more
than any
other organization in the world to stand in the way of death with dignity.»
Neuhaus charges that all the
liberal participants in the symposium believe they «care more about
other people»
than conservatives do and that they displayed «moral smugness.»
It is at least conceivable that
liberal societies such as West Germany, Great Britain, France, and the United States pay a more just respect to the rights of persons on the one hand and, on the
other hand, to the building up of intermediate social bodies through reflection and choice
than do some existing Catholic countries.
If such talk of truth makes my neighbor, the rabbi, uncomfortable — and I can understand how it might — I can only point out that Jesus is my sole reason for defending the rabbi against the onslaughts of either fascist politicians or
liberal theologians who will not embrace him until he becomes «rational» or «enlightened» in
other words, something less
than Jewish.
I applaud people who have chosen that path and stick to it, and I must say I find it intensely tedious to listen to those cynical «vegan - bashers» who think they are amusing as they snark away at vegans without having any idea why they are even doing so,
other than being threatened by something they don't understand, or by some vague aversion they have to any spiritual - sounding practice or «
liberal - hippie - sounding» philosophy.
I'm not too familiar with specific MPs in
other countries, but if you look at US, the only Muslim congressperson (Ellison) is far less religious and far more socially
liberal than an average observant Muslim voter would be.
Other research in political psychology suggests that the no campaign has had a much easier job — those inclined to political conservatism are more likely to have a «negativity bias» in their response to environmental stimuli — conservatives have more of a physiological reaction to potential threats in the environment and subsequently devote more psychological resources towards dealing with them: conservatives, quite literately, see more things that could go wrong
than liberals.
It carries such a strong invocation of the «
liberal metropolitan elite» character - type that the phrase was deliberately employed during the last election by none
other than David Cameron with his jibe about «the same old condescending, bossy, interfering, we - know - best attitude of the Hampstead socialist down the ages».
Rather
than insisting that the current form of Western - type
liberal democracy is the ultimate form of governance for all societies, we need to envisage
other governance models that go one step beyond freedom and incorporate and uphold human dignity needs.
Other UKIP policies are also suggestive of an ultra-conservative agenda rather
than a
liberal one, including the promotion of grammar schools and tougher sentences for prisoners.
With his reputation and media connections, particularly to the Murdochs, he is better placed
than any
other Tory one can think of to see this sort of
liberal initiative through.
Because of the issues raised by David Davis in the by - election, many parties
other than the Conservatives, such as Labour,
Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) and British National Party (BNP) chose not to stand.
My colleague Nate Silver has pointed out that Christie's ideological scores, based on public statements and his donors, make him more
liberal than all the
other serious Republican candidates except George Pataki.
Note also that the correlations between
Liberal Democrat and UKIP change are just as strong as for the
other two parties, but the Lib Dems are reaching the point where it is hard for them to fall much further
than they did in 2012.
Meanwhile commitment to parties
other than Conservative, Labour and
Liberal Democrat has risen from one per cent to six per cent.
The piece still fails to make it clear that
Liberal Conspiracy is anything
other than a Labour supporting mouthpiece.
Republican NYC Councilman Joe Borelli pens an OpEd dismissing the idea of a Cuomo presidential run in 2020, writing of his lack of popularity among
liberals: «It's hard to buy a coffee in Manhattan without bumping into a Bernie bro, but
other than Chris, you won't meet a «Cuomo bro.»»
At times the Twitter conversation is more
liberal than survey responses, while at
other times it is more conservative.