Sentences with phrase «other than the traditional publishing»

The good news for authors is that today there are many ways to publish a book other than the traditional publishing method, including self - publishing.

Not exact matches

One particular study published just a few years ago decided to delve into how well - adjusted children who came into families via methods other than traditional conception are.

Men whose image of themselves falls short of the traditional masculine gender norms, and who feel that others think this about them too, may be more prone to violence than men who feel comfortable in their own skin, suggests research published online in the journal Injury Prevention.

I must say, I have learned more about traditional publishing reading your blog posts than from any other source.

6) Besides speed - to - market, what other advantages will Cursor offer established authors that make it either a better option than, or viable alternative to, traditional publishing?

Not only that, but the self - publishing world arguably demands more of writers than any traditional publisher, requiring them to become their own editors, marketers and agents, among other things.

But to writers who think that their only job is to write a salable book, I'm sure it seems like a lot of unnecessary work (the fact that they're living in a fantasy world if they think they won't have to do stuff other than write in traditional publishing now too is entirely beside the point).

When it comes to publishing paths, the division between traditional publishing and self - publishing has made these agendas more pushy than some other writing - relating debates.

The rest of this article is really three discussions: Why self - publish rather than use a traditional publisher, why entrepreneurs and others who seek to stand out for career or creatuve purposes should self - publish, and finally, HOW does one go about self - publishing.

But other books may only be read thanks to the different kind of support, of enabling, that comes with the traditional publishing infrastructure; if someone other than the author is able to produce them, which might mean needing the existence of a publisher able to back the book's production

Why do some authors — whether traditional or indie published — do better than others?

As a writer, Terry has published more than 60 books with traditional publishers such as Zondervan, St. Martins Press, Tyndale and others.

To some extent, self - published literary novels do get marginalized, if for no other reason than that (not all of course, but) many lit fic authors come from traditional publishing and / or academic backgrounds.

Some manuscripts do need more grunt work than others, but I've found that it varies just as much outside of traditional publishing as it does inside.

Otherwise, rather than hearing about self - published authors who «make it» by landing a traditional deal, we'll be hearing about other writers who decide to take a similar route to Eisler's and go it alone.

If the pathways to publishing outlined by Friedman, other than traditional routes, are to attain full acceptance both inside and outside the industry!

Largely value - priced and non-competitive with traditional trade houses, these Barnes & Noble published books likely have greater profit margins than the books they buy from other publishing houses.

Not only is it possible for our entrepreneurial authors to get books to market far, far faster than traditional publishing does it (although many, alas, are cutting corners in editing, design, and other critical areas), but the going wisdom in terms of online discoverability is that one must have many works available, basically flooding the market with content.

Amazon, and later B&N and others, opened their doors to small presses and even authors themselves, giving us a way to get our work into the hands of readers without having to try to beat down the doors of traditional publishing (where it is now as hard, if not more so, to get an agent than it is a publishing contract).

(I've also got stuff coming out from traditional publishers — people choose to publish independently for reasons other than quality, and most of the self - published authors I have any kind of regular contact with also publish with traditional publishers, depending on the project).

Self - publishing is a great option, but rather than seeing the decision of how to publish as either - or, most authors would be better served by realizing that there are a spectrum of options ranging from traditional publishing on one end to do - it - yourself (DIY) publishing on the other.

I am considering it for works other than my teen novels that have already been published in the traditional manner.

I think the traditional publishing world has some old saw they rely on («red and yellow», etc.), but other than that, I'm not sure what cover qualities are objectively great.

In the eyes of Publisher's Weekly and many others who either sit on the throne of traditional publishing, or grovel at its feet, we are still nothing more than the illiterate redheaded stepchild.

Other authors are, however, dispatching more direct challenges to the traditional publishing industry model by signing deals directly with e-book retailers, rather than through their publishers.

ACC has published a 2010 «Value - Based Fee Primer,» available for reading at http://www.acc.com/valuechallenge/index.cfm, that has some interesting fee rate statistics and alternative arrangements for retaining outside counsel other than traditional «by the hour» retentions.

Rather than the traditional approach requiring the author to grant all rights in the work to the journal, this language has the author granting only what the journal needs to publish, and keeping all other rights for the creator of the work.

10 years ago we may have classified all that publishing as blogging as that's all there was other than publishing through traditional publications.

In a study published in the journal Sex Roles, male and female college undergraduates were given a survey that inquired about their general support for social inequality («It's OK if some groups have more of a chance in life than others») as well as their support for traditional gender power dynamics in the bedroom («The man should be the one who dictates what happens during sex»)[1].