It looks to me like J.C. Hutchins mentions many avenues
other than writing books.
I know my fans like it when I get paid, because it means I don't have to do anything else
other than write the books they like.
Not exact matches
I do not include my online income from my business
other than my severance negotiation
book because
writing takes a lot of work.
It is highly acclaimed and
written by none
other than Seth Godin who has authored 18
books which have been best sellers across the planet.
«Rather
than paying rent (in
other words, putting your money towards your landlord's mortgage), you are investing money in an asset that builds equity,» Scorgie
writes in her
book.
Now men who know more
than God [sarcasm] decide they don't like that saying, and it doesn't fit in their thinking, so off they go and
write books and develope a following of
other people who don't like the truth of what Jesus said.
All those religion
books that were
written thousand years ago by people who had no idea about
other cultures or how could they make sense one thousand years later are no better
than cartoons.
our sharpest minds would be schooled HARD by a supreme creator... not the
other way around... an average joe off the street could
write a better, more moral
book than the Bible and utterly destroy the god of any of the holy
books in a general knowledge debate with ease.
In
other words, what about the Christians who seek to serve and follow Jesus in ways
other than those that Rainer
writes about in his
book?
It's much easier to talk about sex
than money,» said Meyers, who
wrote about greed and the
other seven deadly sins in his
book, «The Virtue in the Vice.»
And how is that claim more valid
than the plethora of
other christian faiths (each with their own
books, claiming to have been
written by the disciples / apostles themselves)?
As he
wrote earlier in this chapter, any use of the test as «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the
other dimensions of narrative explored later in the
book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction
than a deepened symbolic understanding.
I dare say, that if someone
other than the Pope had
written such a
book, it would not have gotten the same amount of publicity and more people would have remained in the dark about this.
Harpur's position to me is no more unique or penetrating
than anyone elses
other than he got to
write a
book with all his views in one place.
but its 100 % false with zero evidence
other than a man -
written book
Other than a
book that was
written down centuries after the events it speaks about occurred, what proof can you present?
You're using a
book that is not factual, has no proof
other than itself, and was
written by men 100's of years after the fact.
Since the bible is a collection of individual
books and letters, etc.,
written over the span of many years, by many different authors, some of which who
wrote anonymously (including the authors of all four gospels), then we might say that it has no purpose
other than what people use it for.
Joseph Smith, who had little formal education,
writes a 532 page fiction
book with multiple story lines, more
than three major ethnic groups that intermingle with one another, creates over 200 new names, many of which have Hebraic origin (Mosiah for instance),
writes in chiasmas poetry, accurately predicts latter day pollution, international intrigue, the dispersing of the Gospel message and a host of
other fictional and hysterical points was WRONG?
I remembered Brennan Manning — the man who has translated the love of God in a way that I could receive it more
than probably any
other writer — was addicted to alcohol and I re-read up one of his last
books before he died: «All is Grace: A Ragamuffin Memoir» where he vulnerably
writes about what this battle has cost him, even as he experienced the unending and unconditional love of God in the midst of it, how he experienced regret and pain and loss alongside of the love and tenderness of God in this dependency.
Rather
than being excited about some new insight from Scripture or idea about theology which I get to pass on to
others, my
writing has become more about pageviews, backlinks, ad revenue, email subscriber stats,
book sales, and comment counts.
It is now a commonplace that he probably
wrote more on the ontological argument
than any
other philosopher — a
book, a substantial part of two
others, and about twenty articles, replies, reviews, and forewords.
Others may feel like the schoolgirl who was assigned to
write a review of a
book on penguins, and did it in one sentence: «This
book tells me more about penguins
than I really wanted to know.»
It might be more entertaining
than many of the
other books on
writing I have read, but it still provided very little to help me in my own
writing.
You mentioned you're going to
write a
book on the subject, and I'd encourage you to get your hands on a copy of mine if not for anything
other than «another perspective» when it comes to your research and prep.
Its almost as if over the years that the various
books were
written, they were copying off of
other religions rather
than describing the same God.
Some change in my thinking on this as on
other matters during the six years separating the two
books can not be denied and perhaps is not to be apologized for; but critics have been mistaken if they have supposed that the authenticity and the unique quality of Jesus» humanity have ever become less precious to me
than when I
wrote the first
book.
But I do think that it is strange to seek after the Spirit of God in the works of authors
other than the one
book we know the Spirit
wrote... why do that?
Since humans
wrote the bible, it is of no more import in defining marriage
than many
other books.
As a recent study conducted by Pew Research Center makes clear — and this is supported by
other studies including a significant study released last fall, «A Survey of American Political Culture,» by Dr. James Davidson Hunter, who
wrote the
book Culture Wars — White Evangelical Protestants are not, as the Washington Post famously called them in 1993, «less affluent, less educated, and more easily led
than the average American.»
He
wrote, «From the most essential and most fundamental about oneself to every single thing or affair in the world, even the meaning of one word or half a word, everything should be investigated to the utmost, and none of it is unworthy of attention... There is no
other way to investigate principle to the utmost
than to pay attention to everything in our daily reading of
books and handling of affairs....
There just isn't any proof that the bible is anything
other than a prejuicial
book about men from a certain time who desired power and
wrote about a god that wanted them to have power, slaves, multiple wifes and children.
Gordon Rupp's
book is a classic,
written thirty years ago, but still with much more to tell us of Luther
than most
other books on his theology.
And it is not that John was unaware of the idea of repentance, for aside from Luke, he uses the term repentance more
than any
other New Testament writer in the
other books of the Bible he has
written.
The
book of Malachi is a more eloquent and revealing link
than Zechariah or any
other writing between the earlier Old Testament world of prophetism and the emerging form of Judaism.
These «doctors of obstetrics»
wrote books and gave advice on something they knew nothing about
other than ideas they'd heard over the ages.
«
written in a down - to - earth, straight - talking, no nonsense, humorous way, the
book goes through everything the
other «pregnancy»
books go through, but with Dad in mind, rather
than mum»
I do think I felt this way because of the lack of influence I had from
other people who have been influenced for a long time by what authors have
written in baby
books, rather
than what they actually feel.
Robert Buckland MP, with whom I share an office, if for no reason
other than I have lots of amusing stories (invariably involving his lateness for everything), and I'm sure he'd be very grateful... I'd probably enjoy
writing a
book on political campaigning, though the art of canvassing is unlikely to trouble the best sellers» charts.
«From my vantage point in Atlanta, I wouldn't say that Andrew Cuomo stood out more
than other people,» said Andra Gillespie, an associate professor of political science at Emory University who has
written a
book about another possible Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey.
He
wrote more
than 100
books on physics, mathematics and astronomy, among
other fields, and is believed to be the first to explain how our brains create the illusion of the moon appearing larger near the horizon.
I suspect the baked oatmeal recipe in my last
book made it into more kitchens
than any
other recipe I've ever
written.
I burned so much fat without even noticing it that I had to start wearing 1 size smaller pants and EAT A LOT MORE FOOD (those ketogenic problems, I know)... I was able to INCREASE MY COGNITIVE SHARPNESS AND FOCUS so I could concentrate on more things
other than food... Get more energy to be more productive and creative...
Write 4
books in 2 months... Overcome the excruciating feeling of hunger and sugar cravings... And helped me to build the business and body of my dreams.
Recognized as a Certified Obesity Specialist, Natalie has
written for more
than 50 publications and, in 2012, published her first
book, «Eat Your Vegetables» and
Other Mistakes Parents Make: Redefining How to Raise Healthy Eaters.
The Fat - Loss Troubleshoot
book that was
written by Leigh Peele has got a lot of attention lately for no
other reason
than its honesty.
Other than that I am a sedentary,
book writing, journal reading, sloth.
I could
write a
book on the subject really, but with different body parts comes certain clothes / silhouettes that are more favorable on you
than others.
In his seminal
book On Liberty, the philosopher John Stuart Mill
wrote: «Persons of genius are... more individual
than any
other people - less capable, consequently, of fitting themselves, without hurtful compression, into any of the small number of moulds which society provides in order to save its members the trouble of forming their own character.»
The Flash solo movie is being based on the 2011 Flashpoint comic
book series,
written by none
other than DC Comics chief creative officer and DC Films co-head Geoff Johns.
There's really not much to the plot
other than for the protagonists to be chased around by the monster horde, while Stine seeks to
write an all - new novel in the manner he
wrote his old one (in manuscript form on a Smith - Corona typewriter that may have magic powers) with all of the characters he ever created on the hope that he can capture lightning in a bottle (or, in this case, a
book) again.