Sentences with phrase «other than you proof»

As I recall I said (citing the source) 8 cm for forty years (which I don't recall characterizing as «dramatic» or much of anything at all other than proof of Rocks» error).

Not exact matches

Patrick Mylund Nielsen, the lead blockchain engineer at JPMorgan, believes Zcash's zero knowledge proof — based technology holds more promise for privacy than any other single approach he's seen.

Nothing draws clients to you faster than the power of social proof — the phenomenon by which others look for external clues to your credibility.

The proof is in the differentiated performance data: Total returns to investors by S&P 500 companies led by their founders were three times higher than at other S&P 500 companies from 1990 to 2014 (Figure 1).

IoT Chain has often been called the «IOTA of China», but unlike IOTA, IoT Chain is supported by a single - chip microcomputer that allows for easier proof - of - hardware security than other options.

The real bone of contention for educated folk is the «miraculous» events, for which there obviously can be no proof other than being tehre to see them.

There is absolutely no proof or evidence that anybody is anything other than worm food once they die.

Now, if you have the guts read Jonah with an open mind for true picture of why there is no proof given other than the sign of Jonah.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

As for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing proof.

You have no proof of any of the remaining statement, other than your sad imagination.

@ Crom, Again you do nt have proof of any thing other than your ignorance.

Of course there isn't a shred of proof that the bible is any more true than any other mythology.

Yet you have no proof of God's existence other than the trite «look at the sun, look at the pretty flowers, look at the ocean, of course you can see God.»

Agnostics know that there is no proof one way or the other, and that specific non-belief is no more scientifically provable than belief.

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

YOu have no proof that any miracle happend other than coincidence.

Nor will you ever get any «proof» Niknak... other than maybe a lighting bolt and a voice from the heavens which are incredibly rare The belief in any god is based upon faith and faith can not be proven.

You have no more proof of your god than any other follower of any other god.

As if it was proof of anything other than an individuals belief.

It would seem that he is saying definitively that his belief is correct without any proof other than his conjecture.

In other words, I make the choice to do something that might alter my physical being if something goes wrong... can I make the birth control argument, since birth control is not 100 % full proof, that this gear is cheaper than the medical cost of my injuries if I fall?

In following their lead, debates with other Christians often takes the form of analyzing the Bible carefully more than slinging proof - texts.

When you look at The Bible and it's origin, the proof is quite dramatic that this is the real deal, moreso than any other book in history!

Except the vikings, cause we actually have proof other than a book.

You have any proof that your Non-Belief holds any more truth than the Scientology or other Faiths?

The claim of my nonpacifist colleagues that the system they are using is more socially responsible, more understandable to ordinary people, more culturally accessible to people of other value communities, more able to manage with discrimination the factual data of political decisions, than is my testimony to Jesus» words and work, still has the burden of proof.

You're on the wrong thread again tommie and by the way you add more proof to the Truth of so called atheists being liars than any other self deluded atheist on these blogs.

What doc - uments and historical facts, not fables, can you point to for your proof other than a few hundred year old writings by heretics?

If you have to have proof other than what is here in front of us then your in for a letdown.

biochemical evidence such as Cytochrome - cyto - C is just one of the thousands of sequences and is not proof of common ancestry, as there are more variations than similarities in the genetic code, on the other hand a study of the amino acid make - up reveals that man is closer to lamprey than are fish.

You have no proof of this claim other than perceived personal experiences involving the supernatural and warm, fuzzy feelings.

Other than a book that was written down centuries after the events it speaks about occurred, what proof can you present?

You're using a book that is not factual, has no proof other than itself, and was written by men 100's of years after the fact.

While it is true that very suggestive metaphysical arguments can be drawn from the reality of form, the intelligibility of the universe, consciousness, the laws of physics, or (most importantly) ontological contingency, the mere biological complexity of this or that organism can never amount to an irrefutable proof of anything other than the incalculable complexity of that organism's phylogenic antecedents.

But other than that, the vast majority of humanity believes in a higher power, so it seems to me the burden of proof would be on the side that is the VAST minority... but once again, the side that is asking the other to change their mind have to prove their point within reason.

It is this misunderstand and lack of knowledge that leads people to contemplate and assert the existence of god with no real proof or evidence other than a sacred collection of texts written over the last few thousand years.

He's living proof that churches are no different than other businesses, with greedy CEO's and elitist behavior.

Remember we have no proof of life other than earth.

Perhaps, though, the biblical character of Jesus, rather than being entirely mythical, was based on one of many Jewish messiah claimants who had followers who euhemerized his life to a greater extent than those of other such claimants, so that in time the stories were so embellished that he became a god in them, but the Tesimonium Flavianum is hardly proof of his existence.

The burden of proof lies on the one who wants to take the two masculine terms generically, and so far, you have offered no proof other than your desire to not understand them as referring to two men.

What could have inspired these men to willingly die as martyrs preaching peace and forgiveness from God through Jesus Christ and preaching the invitation from Jesus Christ to call God «Our Father in Heaven» by means of the Holy Spirit among us other than the historical reality of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead — proof that Jesus is both God and Man?

For Luke, more than the other three Evangelists, the resurrection of Jesus had virtually become the resuscitation of the physical body, an historical event of which ample proof had been provided for the apostles by Jesus himself.

Freethinker, you are just upset that you have zero proof of anything you say other than a book that spends the first half scaring the s ** t out of everyone, and then the second half changing its message.

You say that without any proof other than the faith you have in the truth of the UNSEEN air.

And through all the verbiage, there still is no proof that god or heaven exist other than in the minds of those who do not seek the truth.

I think the burden of proof rests on those followers of the crucified Lamb to show that citizens of heaven can truly pledge allegiance to anyone other than Christ — and that's something Christians need to think about deeply.

God can not and shows no proof of existence other than works created by man.

Indeed, the philosophers have no other proof than the observation of the occurrence of the burning, when there is contact with fire, but observation proves only a simultaneity, not a causation, and, in reality, there is no other cause but God.»

Would you trust a police offer or a judge who based there decisions on anything other than concrete proof.