Not exact matches
This right includes, without limitation, the right to: (a) reproduce, index and store Digital Books on one or more computer facilities, and reformat, convert and encode Digital Books; (b) display, market, transmit, distribute, sell and otherwise digitally make available all or any portion of Printed Books & Digital Books through A&A Properties, for customers and prospective customers to download, access, copy and paste, print, annotate and / or view online and offline, including on portable devices; (c) permit customers to «store» Digital Books that they have purchased from us on servers («Virtual Storage») and to access and re-download such Digital Books from Virtual Storage from time to time both during and after the term of this Agreement; (d) display and distribute (i) your
trademarks and logos in the form you provide them to us or within Printed Books & Digital Books (with such modifications as are necessary to optimize their viewing), and (ii) portions of Printed Books & Digital Books, in each
case solely for the purposes of marketing, soliciting and selling Printed Books & Digital Books and related A&A Printing offerings; (e) use, reproduce, adapt, modify, and distribute, as we determine appropriate, in our sole discretion, any metadata that you provide in connection with Digital Books; and (f) transmit, reproduce and otherwise use (or cause the reformatting, transmission, reproduction, and / or
other use of) Digital Books as mere technological incidents to and for the limited purpose of technically enabling the foregoing (e.g., caching to enable display).
In
other words, he loves cracking the toughest
cases with his
trademark compassion and care.
Pikachu might give you his thoughts on the
case, interact with
other nearby Pokemon, try and hilariously fail to use actual Pokemon moves, or deliver his
trademark «detective tips.»
Other recent historical articles include George Washington and the First Copyright Fair Use
Case, Skippy v. Skippy: The Great Peanut Butter
Trademark Wars, and Defamation from Beyond the Grave.
He has litigated, arbitrated and mediated
cases involving banking (workouts, foreclosures, «lender liability,» and
other aspects of loan enforcement and collection), real estate (developer disputes, landlord / tenant litigation, broker commission disputes, boundary disputes and adverse possession), partnerships and family - owned businesses (issues involving company control, buyouts and valuation), real estate finance (default resolution, servicing and lien priority, trust disputes and guardianships), intellectual property (prosecution and defense of
cases involving trade secrets,
trademarks, copyrights and patents) and
other matters involving various contract and business tort claims.
If you have questions about the Tam
case, or about
trademark registration and other brand management matters, please contact Catherine Farrelly at (212) 826 5579 or
[email protected], Dorna Mohaghegh at (212) 705 4869 or
[email protected], or any other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit Trademark & Brand Manageme
trademark registration and
other brand management matters, please contact Catherine Farrelly at (212) 826 5579 or
[email protected], Dorna Mohaghegh at (212) 705 4869 or
[email protected], or any
other member of the Frankfurt Kurnit
Trademark & Brand Manageme
Trademark & Brand Management Group.
Our lawyers have significant experience in assisting our clients protect and develop the full value of their intellectual property by prosecuting and defending copyright and
trademark infringement
cases, unfair competition actions, Internet and technology disputes, franchise disputes, false advertising claims, litigation concerning trade secrets and restrictive covenants, and
other claims relating to intellectual property.
We have litigated a wide variety of jury
cases, bench trials, Federal Circuit appeals and U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office interferences and
other proceedings across a wide range of technical areas, including:
Barack Ferrazzano's Intellectual Property Group Chair Wendi Sloane and
other industry leaders will cite and examine
cases, provide valuable insights on
trademark law updates and will offer tools and best practices to help you manage and protect your IP assets.
In
case the
trademark isn't approved because it is already in use by some
other company, I could just change it to Hoogas Woogas or something like that.
The
case is prompting
trademark experts to remind companies to shore up the protection of their marks in light of this
case and
others that are making headlines these days.
Over the years, this has included
cases involving patents,
trademarks, copyrights and
other intellectual property, oil and gas, environmental, antitrust, insurance coverage issues, and
other contract and general business issues.
Patrick is an experienced litigator and trial lawyer who has regularly taken
cases through to trial and arbitral hearings, with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation (including international arbitration and
other cross-border disputes), as well as
trademark and patent disputes, trade secret theft, and regulatory investigations in a broad range of industries.
Over the past several years, Brooks Kushman attorneys have argued more
trademark cases before the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Sixth Circuit than any
other law firm.
Cases can be search by party, by patent or
trademark, or by
other parameters.
This Foley Hoag blog has a fun mix of new and relevant copyright and
trademark rulings, explorations of atypical historic
cases, and links to the law firm's
other relevant intellectual property publications and webinar recordings.
On the
other hand and on the same day, the GC issued its Judgment of 10 October 2012 in
case Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the trademark review proced
case Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the trademark review proced
Case T - 569 / 10 Bimbo v OHMI — Panrico (BIMBO DOUGHNUTS), where the challenger of OHIM's decision contended, among
other grounds for appeal, that OHIM had not expressly addressed some of the arguments presented during the
trademark review procedure.
Bob is a trial attorney with extensive experience in
cases involving trade secrets, covenants not to compete,
trademark infringement, software licenses, copyright infringement and patent infringement, as well as
other commercial litigation matters.
This progression is consistent with the migration of
other Supreme Court rules from one intellectual property field into another; for example, the application of the patent doctrine of willful blindness in copyright
cases, [28] and the extension of eBay's [29] rule regarding irreparable harm in patent permanent injunction applications to preliminary injunctions in both
trademark and copyright
cases.
He has prosecuted and defended
cases involving claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty,
trademark infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition, securities and common law fraud, and
other business related torts.
Brian's practice focuses on patent,
trademark, and copyright litigation as well as
other complex commercial
cases involving intellectual property matters.
We also have litigated
trademark and trade dress
cases on behalf of high - end watch manufacturers, a venture - backed technology company, a manufacturer of motorcycle stools, and
others.
Mr Kirby has litigated high - profile
trademark cases concerning the design of the famous HENRY vacuum cleaner, where he protected the shape of the cleaner stripped of all
other indicia, as well as magazine and book
cases, Europe - wide product launches for branded technology and pharmaceutical products and globally famous copyright
cases for the world's largest publisher.
Many commercial
cases arise from NOS Code 190 (
Other Contract), while
others may be coded in PACER as copyright,
trademark, patent, securities or antitrust disputes that contain contract or business tort claims.
In addition, Travis represents plaintiffs and defendants in complex business matters with a particular emphasis on technology, marketing and media disputes, copyrights and
trademarks, along with fiduciary litigation, partnership and shareholder disputes and
other «business divorce»
cases.
She focuses primarily on disputes in the areas of employment law, including wrongful termination, discrimination, sexual harassment and wage and hour
cases; business transactions, including buy / sell agreements,
trademark and
other intellectual property disputes; partnership disputes and fiduciary law, including probate disputes and will contests.
Bergman has extensive trial experience in state and federal courts, litigating unfair competition, false advertising,
trademark, trade dress and copyright infringement
cases along with class actions and
other complex business disputes.
Some of our notable entertainment and media attorneys are: John Quinn, General Counsel of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who has also represented entertainment and media clients in a number of high profile
cases; Kathleen Sullivan, the former Dean of Stanford Law School, First Amendment scholar, and nationally renowned appellate advocate, who heads the firm's appellate practice group; Bob Raskopf, an expert in the sports, entertainment and media bars in New York, who is perhaps best known for his work on behalf of professional sports leagues and teams, newspapers and publishers; Claude Stern, who has represented a broad array of leading software developers, videogame manufacturers, online publishers and
other media clients in all forms of intellectual property litigation, including copyright, patent, trade secret,
trademark, and licensing disputes; Bruce Van Dalsem, who has tried and resolved disputes for studios, producers and performing artists in the film, television, music and finance businesses, securing a top five verdict in California based on the misappropriation of a film library; Gary Gans, an expert litigator in motion picture financing, production and distribution disputes, as well as copyright and idea theft
cases, who has been named in 2012 by The Hollywood Reporter as one of America's «Top Entertainment Attorneys;» Jeff McFarland, who has litigated entertainment related
cases for more than 20 years, including
cases involving motion picture and television series profits, video game licenses, idea theft and the «seven year rule;» and Michael Williams, who represents a satellite exhibitor and
other media clients in
trademark, copyright, patent, antitrust and
other commercial litigation.
A business lawyer has to provide counsel on the various aspects of business operations of a company, create and review legal documents, negotiate with
other companies on behalf of the client regarding any agreement or contract, handle disputes arising due to any legal complications and
other cases like bankruptcy, licensing,
trademark, copyright issues and so on.
You may not, without Company's express written permission, (a) link to any part of the Site through the use of frames, inline links or any
other similar technology whereby the content will be displayed without leaving the linking web site, (b) use any
trademark, logo or content as part of a link, and / or (c) create any link implying, intentionally or unintentionally, that an endorsement, sponsorship or affiliation with Company exists when that is not the
case.