I've read
other traditional authors when I made the jump to full time is having that year worth of bills paid.
Not exact matches
The
traditional Christian belief was that the Bible was literally the word of God, dictated to the evangelists and
other authors by the Holy Spirit.
Without taking a strong stand on the controversial question of whether inter-species relationships ought to be governed by justice — in
other words, the question of whether we owe anything to animals as such — the
author establishes all sorts of interesting parallels between evolutionary biology and
traditional theology in this area, as well as challenges from one to the
other.
The evangelists are genuinely
authors,
authors using
traditional material but nonetheless
authors: they write for a definite purpose, they give their work a distinct and individual structure, they have thematic concerns which they pursue, the characters in the story they each tell function as protagonists in a plot, and so on... If the evangelists are
authors, then they must be studied as
authors, and they must be studied as
other authors are studied.
I recently read the book «Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, «A's, Praise, and
Other Bribes» by Alfie Kohn, a noted
author and outspoken critic of
traditional education, including grades, test scores, and homework.
Some
other papers, published in
traditional subscription - based journals, are made freely available on an
author's website or through an institutional or government archive, often after a 6 - or 12 - month «embargo» imposed by the publisher to protect subscription revenue.
These «
other» lncRNAs are essentially set aside; in most of their analyses, the
authors compare / contrast the three lncRNA categories described above with
traditional mRNAs.
At Manhattan Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in New York City, Loren Fishman, MD,
author of Healing Yoga, regularly uses yoga alongside
traditional treatments to treat scoliosis, rotator cuff syndrome, and
other neuromuscular problems.
«This is just more of the move away from
traditional broadcasters into new areas such as cable and
other platforms including satellite and mobile phone,» says the
author of «New New Media,» adding «it won't be too far off that we will see a series that never aired on either network or cable, that began and ended just on the web on this list.»
(p. 222) It does not seem unfair to expect the
authors to provide evidence,
other than the fact of differentiation, to support these assertions, or to say what is being done in
traditional public schools that better prepares students for life in a democratic society.
The study's
authors speculate on four potential explanations for the large negative effects that their program evaluation found: misalignment of private school curriculum to the Louisiana State Standards; differences between serving scholarship students with achievement gaps and
traditional private school students; success of
other education developments, especially in New Orleans; and the overall quality of private schools willing to participate in the program.
Based on these two principles and
other lessons from the
authors» analyses, this section outlines recommendations for state leaders and policymakers and for
traditional and alternative teacher preparation programs.
The
authors recommend that the state allow schools to use «well - designed» portfolios, comprised of work from each of five different subject areas to include research essays, art work and
other sophisticated projects that can't be captured on a test in place of
traditional exit exams.
Furthermore, the
authors note, as the charter movement gained momentum and
other states passed similar laws, a more market - driven vision of charter schools emerged that emphasized competition as an incentive for
traditional public schools to improve, rather than the idea of charter - tested innovations that could boost public school practices broadly.
Using one case study from sports (the Vancouver Giants hockey team) and one from education (Hackney Schools Borough in London, England), the
authors illustrate how the six components of uplifting leadership combine the hard and soft skills that are often set against each
other in
traditional leadership practice: counterintuitive thinking combined with disciplined application; dreaming with determination; collaboration with competition; metrics with meaning; pushing and pulling people into change; and long - term sustainability with short - term success.
«This finding about the importance of tutoring is in line with
other recent evidence pointing to dramatic gains from intensive tutoring on its own, suggesting a good place to start for effective and practical reform at
traditional public schools,» wrote the
authors, Julia Chabrier of J - Pal North America, Sarah Cohodes of Teachers College Columbia University, and Philip Oreopoulos of the economics department at the University of Toronto.
The
author proposes a better model for achieving excellence, which is to focus on excellence for all students in not only the
traditional three R's (reading, writing, and arithmetic) but also the
other three R's (reasoning, resilience, and responsibility).
Amazon's suite of services for independent
authors makes it possible for me and many
other authors to bypass
traditional publishing companies.
The indie writers who are now wanting to go with a
traditional publisher because — duh — they will get this huge advance and will be sent on tours to sign their books and will soon be playing poker with
other best selling
authors ala Castle.
Horizons will make it possible for thousands of
authors, whose manuscripts Harlequin or
other traditional publisher can not publish, to see their books in print.
Yes, and the
other thing to keep in mind is that, in
traditional publishing deals,
authors receive the «thinnest fraction» of their book's total sales revenues.
I looked at
traditional publishers who might be a good fit for my book and read every blog post I could find about
other author's experiences.
Internet media coverage, as well as inclusion in blogs and
other sites, is an ideal complement to
traditional media because when a book or
author is featured online, that coverage virtually never goes away!
She encourages her
authors to have one foot in
traditional print publishing and the
other in the digital - first arena, and is a huge advocate of utilizing secondary rights — she has sold film / TV, audio and foreign rights for her clients.
As we wrote at the time, this example makes the point that
authors already have a lot of the tools for marketing their work, and in some cases — as with Hocking, Locke and
other self - publishers such as J.A. Konrath — this can make them so self - sufficient that they no longer need the support of a
traditional publishing deal.
And what about hybrid
authors that go the
other way, start self - publishing and then go
traditional?
Some
authors are even selling the rights to some of their books to
traditional publishers while keeping control of
others, or selling print rights and keeping those to e-books.
In
other posts, I have suggested for some time that agents and
traditional publishers are watching self - published
authors for titles that may make sense for them to pick up.
I am one of those — a hybrid
author who has used
traditional publishers and self publishing — and the reasons
others cite line up with my own,
I launched a
traditional publishing company with my first book back in 2003 (when «self - publishing» was a bad word), and then went on to publish
other authors using a royalty model (
authors do not pay for * anything *).
After getting turned off by the world of
traditional publishing, she took back control and decided to publish subsequent books under her own company imprint, which was already producing books for
other nonfiction
authors.)
As an indie
author, you can also make edits to your book cover, your price, and
other important details based on reader feedback before you move to a final version, and this is not something
traditional deals typically allow.
I have
other friends who take the hybrid route, publishing with both
traditional publishers and as indie
authors.
* Survey participants were required to have met the following criterion: They had
authored one or more published books including fiction, non-fiction, poetry, short stories, educational books and scholarly works, in formats which included
traditional print publishing, ePublishing, self - publishing, multi-platform works or
other equivalent book - length publications (including
other digital platforms and related performance works).
Half of the
authors were published through a
traditional publisher, and the
other half started their own publishing company.
I have
other author friends, multi-published, who have been dropped and can't get another contract from a
traditional house.
After writing a post on the 3rd pointing out ways that my publisher, Penguin - Random House, and
other traditional publishers could improve, I was surprised to see something new in my email inbox: an
author newsletter.
While we also cover social media, virtual book tours, public speaking, and
other tactics, I want participating
authors to benefit from the fact that legitimate,
traditional media outlets still carry a great deal of weight with book buyers.
Plenty of
authors publish themselves and are then picked up by a literary agent or
traditional publisher, and
others have left their
traditional publisher to publish their own work.
This description of
traditional publishing (or what some now call legacy publishing) is still a viable path for
authors today, but now there are three
other distinct paths an
author can pursue to get published: DIY, General Contractor, and Publishing Package.
Authors and many
others throw around terms like «POD publisher,» «
traditional publisher,» and «self - published» with lack of understanding of what terms really mean.»
And then the
other thing is the understanding that nowadays, in the
traditional sense of things, an
author needed to make it — especially in fiction — in the first 90 days with that book, or it was going to be remaindered on the shelves.
The founders were largely
authors who wrote
traditional Western fiction, but the organization swiftly expanded to include historians and
other nonfiction
authors, young adult and romance writers, and writers interested in regional history.
I do believe self - publishing can also make a lot of sense, especially if the
author is willing to engage in the marketing process and
other services a
traditional publisher offers.
I love
traditional publishing but the more I watched
other authors take that leap, I knew my time was coming to jump too.
In
traditional publishing, often your editor will ask
other authors at the publishing house to read and endorse your book.
Others say
traditional publishing is a scam, they use their
authors, and only the top sellers get anything out of the relationship.
6) Besides speed - to - market, what
other advantages will Cursor offer established
authors that make it either a better option than, or viable alternative to,
traditional publishing?
Just as Marc has an aversion to self - published novels, there are many
others who feel similarly and the only way to reach them was to join the ranks of
traditional published
authors.
(Actually, the
authors who will really make money in this new world are those who can write fast or who have backlists they own and sell to both
traditional publishers and have
other projects up at the same time to take advantage of this promotion.)